Urban populations, especially vulnerable communities, are facing increasing flood risks due to the rising frequency of floods caused by climate change and rapid growth. Effective mitigation requires moving beyond physical and environmental approaches to embrace social dimensions. This study examined the prevailing social drivers of floods in flood-prone communities in Metro Manila, Philippines using social data acquired through a door-to-door household survey. Responses were assessed using exploratory and combined qualitative and quantitative analyses. The findings of this study show that the decision to remain in flood-prone areas is influenced by attachment to homes and acclimatization to the environment, convenience of accessible amenities to fulfill basic needs, livelihood dependence, economic considerations, house ownership, and perceived safety from floods. When choosing a place to live, the complex tradeoffs of residents are reflected, wherein daily economic concerns outweigh the possible flood damage. By understanding the social drivers of residency, policymakers and community leaders can develop targeted interventions and formulate strategies to address the root causes of the problem, leading to effective interventions and enhancing the resilience of urban communities.

This study applied the interaction of social vulnerability and hazard to assess flood risk in three urbanized areas within the Pasig‐Marikina‐Laguna‐Lake catchment: Manila, Marikina, and Parañaque in Metro Manila, Philippines. This study examined risk patterns across different flood return periods (5, 50, and 100 years) in these urban river environments and provided both city‐wide and localized risk assessments. The social vulnerability to flood index (SVFI) was calculated using socioeconomic indicators, while the hazard index was derived from flood depth categories. Results show that city‐level risk indices are low to moderate, with Marikina consistently having the highest risk, followed by Manila and Parañaque. However, localized assessments reveal high‐risk areas within cities, with Manila being the most vulnerable to frequent floods (5‐year return period) and Marikina to less frequent but extreme events (50‐ and 100‐year return periods). Parañaque maintains the lowest risk profile across all scenarios. This study highlights the importance of considering both citywide trends and localized high‐risk areas in flood risk management. It provides valuable insights for disaster management planners and policymakers, enabling the development of targeted strategies for sustainable urban river management and flood risk reduction in rapidly urbanizing river systems. The methodology presented applies to other urban areas that face similar flood risks.