Background: To evaluate the effects of 10% GlicoPro tear substitute therapy in patients with severe dry eye disease (DED). Methods: In this prospective longitudinal study, 30 individuals receiving 10% GlicoPro four times daily for DED were evaluated. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, average non-invasive break-up time (A-NIBUT), non-anesthetic and anesthetic corneal esthesiometry (CE), ocular pain, and the presence of conjunctivochalasis (CCH) were used as clinical endpoints. Treatment compliance using dosing diaries and AEs was assessed. Results: A significant improvement was observed in the clinical endpoints: the ΔOSDI questionnaire was −39.27 ± 13.22 [−65 to −15] points, ΔA-NIBUT was 3.10 ± 1.31 [1 to 5] s, Δnon-anesthetic CE was 14 ± 6.35 [5 to 25] mm, and Δanesthetic CE was 13 ± 5.35 [5 to 20] mm (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Ocular pain was reduced in 92.5% of the patients at the end of the follow-up. However, there was no change in the presence of CCH. In addition, all the patients were fully compliant with the dosing and no AEs related to the use of the 10% GlicoPro tear substitute were reported. Conclusions: The 10% GlicoPro tear substitute has the potential to achieve beneficial effects in ocular surface treatments.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the effects of 0.3% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) tear substitute treatment in dry eye disease (DED), as well as treatment compliance and adverse events (AEs). Methods: In this prospective, longitudinal study, a total of 30 eyes receiving 0.3% CMC tear substitute four times daily for DED were evaluated. Clinical endpoints included an ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, average non-invasive tear film break-up time (A-NIBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), and a Schirmer test with anesthesia (ST). Treatment compliance and AEs were also assessed. All evaluations were performed at 2, 4, and 12 weeks of follow-up. Results: At the end of the follow-up, significant improvement was observed in all clinical endpoints with the following mean values: ΔOSDI questionnaire of −22.53 ± 14.68 points, ΔA-NIBUT of 4.81 ± 2.88 s, ΔLLT of 5.63 ± 6.53 nm, and ΔST of 2.8 ± 2.1 mm (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Although repeated measures analysis showed that all clinical endpoints presented statistically significant differences (p < 0.001 for all comparisons LLT_Baseline–LLT_2-weeks (p = 0.460) and LLT_4-weeks–LLT_12-weeks (p = 0.071) were the only pairs of measures that reported non-statistically significant differences). In addition, treatment compliance was 94.3 ± 5.2% and transient AEs related to the use of 0.3% CMC tear substitute were reported. Conclusions: 0.3% CMC tear substitute treatment seems to achieve beneficial effects on the OSDI questionnaire, A-NIBUT, LLT, and ST. However, further studies at this concentration are needed to confirm these results.