Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are a rare group of malignancies arising from the thymus. Surgery remains the foundation of treatment for patients with early‐stage disease. Limited treatment options are available for the treatment of unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent TETs and are associated with modest clinical efficacy. The emergence of immunotherapies in the treatment of solid tumors has generated significant interest in understanding their role in TET treatment. However, the high rates of comorbid paraneoplastic autoimmune disorders, particularly in thymoma, have tempered expectations regarding the role of immune‐based therapies. Clinical studies of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in thymoma and thymic carcinoma have revealed higher frequencies of immune‐related adverse events (IRAEs) and limited efficacy. Despite these setbacks, the growing understanding of the thymic tumor microenvironment and systemic immune system has advanced the understanding of these diseases and provided opportunities for novel immunotherapy modalities. Ongoing studies are evaluating numerous immune‐based treatments in TETs with the goal of improving clinical efficacy and mitigating IRAE risk. This review will provide insight into the current understanding of the thymic immune microenvironment, outcomes of previous ICB studies, and review treatments currently being explored for the management of TET.

Malignant tumors exhibit rapid growth and high metabolic rates, similar to embryonic stem cells, and depend on aerobic glycolysis, known as the “Warburg effect”. This understanding has enabled the use of radiolabeled glucose analogs in tumor staging and therapeutic response assessment via PET scans. Traditional treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy target rapidly dividing cells, causing significant toxicity. Despite immunotherapy’s impact on solid tumor treatment, gaps remain, leading to research on cancer cell evasion of immune response and immune tolerance induction via interactions with the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME, consisting of immune cells, fibroblasts, vessels, and the extracellular matrix, regulates tumor progression and therapy responses. TME-targeted therapies aim to transform this environment from supporting tumor growth to impeding it and fostering an effective immune response. This review examines the metabolic disparities between immune cells and cancer cells, their impact on immune function and therapeutic targeting, the TME components, and the complex interplay between cancer cells and nontumoral cells. The success of TME-targeted therapies highlights their potential to achieve better cancer control or even a cure.

Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) often fails to elicit durable antitumor immunity. Recent studies suggest that ICB does not restore potency to terminally dysfunctional T cells, but instead drives proliferation and differentiation of self-renewing progenitor T cells into fresh, effector-like T cells. Antitumor immunity catalyzed by ICB is characterized by mobilization of antitumor T cells in systemic circulation and tumor. To address whether abundance of self-renewing T cells in blood is associated with immunotherapy response, we used flow cytometry of peripheral blood from a cohort of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICB. At baseline, expression of T-cell factor 1 (TCF1), a marker of self-renewing T cells, was detected at higher frequency in effector-memory (CCR7–) CD8+ T cells from patients who experienced durable clinical benefit compared to those with primary resistance to ICB. On-treatment blood samples from patients benefiting from ICB also exhibited a greater frequency of TCF1+CCR7–CD8+ T cells and higher proportions of TCF1 expression in treatment-expanded PD-1+CCR7–CD8+ T cells. The observed correlation of TCF1 frequency in CCR7–CD8+ T cells and response to ICB suggests that broader examination of self-renewing T-cell abundance in blood will determine its potential as a noninvasive, predictive biomarker of response and resistance to immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint blockade is limited by resistance to treatment, with many patients not achieving durable antitumor responses. Self-renewing (T cell factor 1+ [TCF1+]) CD8+ T cells have recently been implicated in efficacy of anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (anti–PD-1). Mice challenged with syngeneic tumors were treated with anti–PD-1 and/or a reversible inhibitor of PI3K δ, designed to promote T cell self-renewal. Growth of tumors in untreated mice was characterized by waning proportions of TCF1+ T cells, suggesting self-renewing T cells become limiting for successful immunotherapy. Higher proportions of TCF1+ T cells in tumor and blood correlated with better control of tumor growth. Combining anti–PD-1 and inhibitor of PI3K δ conferred superior protection compared with either monotherapy and was associated with higher frequency of TCF1+ T cells in tumor and blood compared with anti–PD-1 alone. These findings reveal predictive importance of self-renewing T cells in anti-tumor immunity and suggest that resistance-directed strategies to enhance T cell self-renewal could potentiate the efficacy of PD-1 blockade.

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), which include thymomas and thymic carcinomas, are a rare, heterogeneous group of malignancies that originate from the thymus gland. As an important organ of immune cell development, thymic tumors, particularly thymomas, are often associated with paraneoplastic autoimmune disorders. The advances in targeted therapies for both solid and hematologic malignancies have resulted in improved patient outcomes, including better and more durable efficacy and improved toxicity. Targeted therapies have also been investigated in the treatment of TETs, though the results have largely been modest. These have included somatostatin-receptor-targeting therapies, KIT- and EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors, epigenetic modulators, anti-angiogenesis agents, and agents targeting the cell proliferation and survival pathways and cell cycle regulators. Numerous investigated treatments have failed or underperformed due to a lack of a strong biomarker of efficacy. Ongoing trials are attempting to expand on previous experiences, including the exploration of effective drugs in early-stage disease. Novel combination therapy strategies are also undergoing evaluation, with the goal of augmenting efficacy and understanding the toxicity while expanding the biomarkers of efficacy and safety. With advances in technology to improve target identification and drug delivery, old targets may become new opportunities, and the subsequently developed drugs may find their place in the treatment of thymic tumors.