Charles Mace

Prof. Charles Mace


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 July 2012 in Nano Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OAOzge Akbulut
Ozge Akbulut
CMCharles Mace
Charles Mace
Ramses MartinezRamses Martinez
Ramses Martinez
AKAshok A. Kumar
Ashok A. Kumar
ZNZhihong Nie
Zhihong Nie
GWGeorge M. Whitesides
George M. Whitesides

13 May 2010 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KMKatherine Mirica
Katherine Mirica
SPScott T. Phillips
Scott T. Phillips
CMCharles Mace
Charles Mace
GWGeorge M. Whitesides
George M. Whitesides

17 May 2012 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCharles Mace
Charles Mace
OAOzge Akbulut
Ozge Akbulut
AKAshok A. Kumar
Ashok A. Kumar
NSNathan D. Shapiro
Nathan D. Shapiro
RDRatmir Derda
Ratmir Derda
GWGeorge M. Whitesides
George M. Whitesides

30 August 2016 in Lab on a Chip
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSamuel B. Berry
Samuel B. Berry
SFSyrena C. Fernandes
Syrena C. Fernandes
ARAnjali Rajaratnam
Anjali Rajaratnam
NDNicholas S. DeChiara
Nicholas S. DeChiara
CMCharles Mace
Charles Mace
We developed a paper-based microfluidic device that enables the transport of cells and measurement of the hematocrit of whole blood.

29 December 2022 in Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KBKeith R. Baillargeon
Keith R. Baillargeon
CMCharles Mace
Charles Mace
In the wake of the COVID‐19 global pandemic, self‐administered microsampling tools have reemerged as an effective means to maintain routine healthcare assessments without inundating hospitals or clinics. Finger‐stick collection of blood is easily performed at home, in the workplace, or at the point‐of‐care, obviating the need for a trained phlebotomist. While the initial collection of blood is facile, the diagnostic or clinical utility of the sample is dependent on how the sample is processed and stored prior to transport to an analytical laboratory. The past decade has seen incredible innovation for the development of new materials and technologies to collect low‐volume samples of blood with excellent precision that operate independently of the hematocrit effect. The final application of that blood (i.e., the test to be performed) ultimately dictates the collection and storage approach as certain materials or chemical reagents can render a sample diagnostically useless. Consequently, there is not a single microsampling tool that is capable of addressing every clinical need at this time. In this review, we highlight technologies designed for patient‐centric microsampling blood at the point‐of‐care and discuss their utility for quantitative sampling as a function of collection material and technique. In addition to surveying methods for collecting and storing whole blood, we emphasize the need for direct separation of the cellular and liquid components of blood to produce cell‐free plasma to expand clinical utility. Integrating advanced functionality while maintaining simple user operation presents a viable means of revolutionizing self‐administered microsampling, establishing new avenues for innovation in materials science, and expanding access to healthcare.

26 April 2017
Verified
Closed access
SFSyrena C. Fernandes
Syrena C. Fernandes
JWJenna A. Walz
Jenna A. Walz
DWDaniel J. Wilson
Daniel J. Wilson
JBJessica C. Brooks
Jessica C. Brooks
CMCharles Mace
Charles Mace