The first generation of clinical trials of targeted agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has concluded. To date, only a few of these new agents can offer hope of a substantial impact on the natural history of the disease. Nevertheless, clinically meaningful advances have already been achieved. In chemotherapy-refractory advanced NSCLC patients, gefitinib and erlotinib, two epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, represent a further chance for tumor control and symptom palliation. In chemotherapy-naive, advanced, nonsquamous NSCLC patients, the combination of the anti–vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab with chemotherapy was demonstrated to produce better survival outcomes than with chemotherapy alone. The relative failure of first-generation targeted therapies in lung cancer may be a result of multilevel cross-stimulation among the targets of the new biological agents. Thus, blocking only one of these pathways allows others to act as salvage or escape mechanisms for cancer cells. Preclinical evidence of the synergistic antitumor activity achievable by combining targeted agents that block multiple signaling pathways has recently been emerging. Clinical trials of multitargeted therapy may represent the second generation of studies in this field, and some of these are already ongoing. In a recent phase I/II trial, the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab demonstrated very promising activity in the treatment of advanced NSCLC pretreated with chemotherapy. Whether the multitargeted approach is best performed using combinations of selective agents or agents that intrinsically target various targets is a matter of debate.

The discovery that a number of aberrant tumorigenic processes and signal transduction pathways are mediated by druggable protein kinases has led to a revolutionary change in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are the targets of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), some of them approved for treatment and others currently in clinical development. First-generation agents offer, in target populations, a substantial improvement of outcomes compared with standard chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Unfortunately, drug resistance develops after initial benefit through a variety of mechanisms. Novel generation EGFR and ALK inhibitors are currently in advanced clinical development and are producing encouraging results in patients with acquired resistance to previous generation agents. The search for new drugs or strategies to overcome the TKI resistance in patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements is to be considered a priority for the improvement of outcomes in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Lung cancer is the most common cancer in the world today, in terms of both incidence and mortality. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all lung cancers diagnosis, and the majority of people diagnosed with NSCLC have advanced disease.In this review the main advances achieved in the medical treatment of advanced NSCLC are discussed, regarding both targeted therapies and chemotherapy. Among targeted therapies, recent data on the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab and the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosyne kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib are described. Among chemotherapeutic agents, the role of pemetrexed is discussed.The reader will gain up-to-date information on the main advances, achieved in the last 3 years in the medical treatment of advanced NSCLC.Some recent advances have changed the face of the first-line chemotherapy of advanced NSCLC, giving physicians more options to tailor choice in this challenging setting.

Maintenance therapy is emerging as a treatment strategy in the management of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Initial trials addressing the question of duration of combination chemotherapy failed to show any overall survival benefit for the prolonged administration over a fixed number of cycles with an increased risk for cumulative toxicity. Nowadays several agents with different ways of administration and a different pattern of toxicity have been formally investigated in the maintenance setting. Maintenance strategies include continuing with an agent already present in the induction regimen or switching to a different one. Taking into consideration that no comparative trials of maintenance with different chemotherapy drugs or targeted agents have been conducted, the choice and the duration of maintenance agents is largely empirical. Furthermore, it is still unknown and it remains an open question if this approach needs to be proposed to every patient in the case of partial/complete response or stable disease after the induction therapy. Here, we critically review available data on maintenance treatment, discussing the possibility to tailor the right treatment to the right patient, in an attempt to optimize costs and benefits of an ever-growing panel of different treatment options.

Platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without the antiangiogenetic drug bevacizumab, is the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) gefitinib has been recently approved as treatment of patients with EGFR mutated tumors (including first-line). Three agents are approved for treating non-selected patients who progress after one prior regimen: docetaxel, pemetrexed, and the EGFR-TKI erlotinib. Gefitinib can be used as second-line treatment in patients with EGFR mutated tumors. Although these agents have yelded similar outcomes in terms of antitumor activity and efficacy in unselected NSCLC patients, they have different toxicity profiles, and recently some strong factors that can help in the choice among them have been detected. In particular, the hystotype, the EGFR gene mutational status, the response to previous first-line chemotherapy and the correlation of the safety profile of the agents with Performance Status and comorbidities of the patients, are the most important factors that drive the choice of the second-line treatment. Obviously, the drugs administered in the first-line treatment strongly influence the choice of the second-line treatment because some of the currently available drugs can be used in both settings. Thus, more than in the past, first and second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC are linked, and the choice of second-line treatment is part of a strategy decided when beginning the firstline treatment.

Despite the high response rate to chemotherapy, there have been few advances in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the last decades. The state-of-the-art second-line therapy and future research developments in relapsed SCLC are reviewed. There are no optimal drugs for second-line treatment of recurrent SCLC but only agents registered for this use. Topotecan remains the standard-of-care for the treatment of second-line platinum-sensitive SCLC patients worldwide, while amrubicin is another option, but registered only in Japan. To date, no targeted agents reporting interesting results in second-line SCLC treatment are available. The next-generation DNA sequencing should discover somatic gene alterations and their roles in SCLC to help in selecting patients who could benefit from a targeted agent. Two immunotherapeutics, ipilimumab and nivolumab, have shown promising preliminary results and are being investigated in ongoing trials. Second-line treatment is not an option for most SCLC patients. Given the evidence up to now, the potentials for immuno-oncology in SCLC are high. The hope is that these expectations are met, and that all drugs being developed will offer new and improved treatment options for SCLC patients.