The clinical relevance of perichondrium was recognized more than a century ago. In children and adolescents, perichondrium is essential for the formation and growth of the cartilaginous part of craniofacial features and must be considered during reconstructive surgery in the head and neck area. Also in adults, perichondrium must be preserved during surgical intervention for adequate postoperative healing and cartilage maintenance. Furthermore, the regenerative function of perichondrium in the ribs enables the harvesting of the rib cartilage tissue for reconstruction of craniofacial features. With the advancement of tissue engineering, renewed attention has been focused on the perichondrium, because without this crucial tissue, the function of cartilage engineered for craniofacial reconstruction is incomplete and may not be suitable for long-term reconstructive goals. Furthermore, interest in the perichondrium was revived owing to its possible role as a microenvironment containing stem and progenitor cells. Here we will revisit seminal studies on the perichondrium and review the current literature to provide a holistic perspective on the importance of this tissue in the context of regenerative medicine. We will also highlight the functional significance of perichondrium for cartilage tissue engineering. Impact statement: All adult cartilage tissues, with the exception of articular and fibrocartilage, are lined by a stratified tissue called the perichondrium. The perichondrium contributes to growth, structural stability, and regeneration and maintenance of the organ, but the cellular mechanisms underlying these processes are not well understood. This review provides a comprehensive summary of past and recent studies on perichondrium from the vantage point of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Of particular relevance is the evidence that perichondrium might contain chondrogenic progenitor cells. Cartilage tissue engineering holds great promise for novel treatments of craniofacial defects, and a better understanding of the function and structure of the perichondrium could contribute to improved therapies for head and neck reconstructive surgery and beyond.

Decellularized extracellular matrices (DECM) are among the most common types of materials used in tissue engineering due to their cell instructive properties, biodegradability, and accessibility. Particularly in cartilage, a natural collagen type II matrix can be a promising means to provide the necessary cues and support for chondrogenic stem and progenitor cells (CSPCs). However, efficient remodeling of the transplanted DECM is largely dependent on the host immune response, with macrophages playing the central role in orchestrating both inflammatory and regenerative processes. Here we assessed the reaction of human primary macrophages to the cartilage DECM. Our findings show that the xenogeneic collagen matrix can elicit a mixed response in human macrophages, whereby the inflammatory response (M1) and the activation of remodeling (M2) type of macrophages are both present. Additionally, we demonstrate the inhibitory effect of macrophage response on the migratory capacity of human CSPCs. We further show that the inflammatory reaction of macrophages to the cartilage DECM, as well as the resulting inhibitory effects on CSPC migration, can be attenuated by interleukin‐4 (IL‐4). Finally, we demonstrate that IL‐4 can effectively bind the matrix, thereby modulating macrophage response by reducing the inflammatory reaction and inducing the M2 phenotype.

The demand for cartilage reconstruction in the head and neck region arises frequently due to trauma, malignancies, and hereditary diseases. Traditional tissue engineering produces cartilage from a small biopsy by combining biomaterials and expanded cells. However, this top-down approach is associated with several limitations, including the non-uniform distribution of cells, lack of physiological cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, and compromised mechanical properties and tissue architecture. The capacity of cells to aggregate into microtissues enables an alternative bottom-up approach to producing cartilage with or without further scaffolding support. Here we explored the optimal conditions for obtaining small spheroids from head and neck cartilage tissues. We used chondrocytes (CCs) and chondroprogenitors (CPCs) isolated from auricular and nasoseptal cartilage to prepare spheroids using ultra-low attachment (ULA) plates or micromass cultures. Different cell densities were tested to estimate the minimal cell number required for optimal spheroid formation. Furthermore, we evaluated the influence of key chondrogenic cytokines, such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, on spheroid morphology and the production of cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) components. Spheroids expressing cartilage markers were formed with 2.5 × 10⁴ cells in a commercially available chondrogenic differentiation medium on ULA plates but not in conventional micromass cultures. Differences were seen in auricular and nasal spheroids with respect to growth patterns and response to cytokine composition. Auricular spheroids were larger and showed size increase in culture, whereas nasal aggregates tended to shrink. Cytokines differentially influenced spheroid growth, and ECM structure and composition. Under all tested conditions, both spheroid types generated one or more cartilage ECM components, including elastin, which was also found in nasal spheroids despite their hyaline origin. Our results suggest that spheroid cultures can offer a viable approach to generating mature cartilage tissue without a biomaterial scaffold. Furthermore, nasal CCs and CPCs can be used to generate elastic cartilage. The findings of the study provide technical insights toward the goal of obtaining cartilage microtissues that can be potentially used for reconstructive procedures of HNC cartilage defects.

Nasal septum defects can currently only be reconstructed using autologous cartilage grafts. In this study, we examine the reconstruction of septal cartilage defects in a rabbit model using porcine decellularized nasal septal cartilage (DNSC) functionalized with recombinant platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDFG-BB). The supportive function of the transplanted DNSC was estimated by the degree of septum deviation and shrinkage using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The biocompatibility of the transplanted scaffolds was evaluated by histology according to international standards. A study group with an autologous septal transplant was used as a reference. In situ regeneration of cartilage defects was assessed by histological evaluation 4 and 16 weeks following DNSC transplantation. A study group with non-functionalized DNSC was introduced for estimation of the effects of PDFG-BB functionalization. DNSC scaffolds provided sufficient structural support to the nasal septum, with no significant shrinkage or septal deviations as evaluated by the MRI. Biocompatibility analysis after 4 weeks revealed an increased inflammatory reaction of the surrounding tissue in response to DNSC as compared to the autologous transplants. The inflammatory reaction was, however, significantly attenuated after 16 weeks in the PDGF-BB group whereas only a slight improvement of the biocompatibility score was observed in the untreated group. In situ regeneration of septal cartilage, as evidenced by the degradation of the DNSC matrix and production of neocartilage, was observed in both experimental groups after 16 weeks but was more pronounced in the PDFG-BB group. Overall, DNSC provided structural support to the nasal septum and stimulated in situ regeneration of the cartilage tissue. Furthermore, PDFG-BB augmented the regenerative potential of DNSC and enhanced the healing process, as demonstrated by reduced inflammation after 16 weeks.

The gold standard of auricular reconstruction involves manual graft assembly from autologous costal cartilage. The intervention may require multiple surgical procedures and lead to donor‐site morbidity, while the outcome is highly dependent on individual surgical skills. A tissue engineering approach provides the means to produce cartilage grafts of a defined shape from autologous chondrocytes. The use of autologous cells minimizes the risk of host immune response; however, factors such as biomaterial compatibility and in vitro maturation of the tissue‐engineered (TE) cartilage may influence the engraftment and shape‐stability of TE implants. Here, this work tests the biocompatibility of bioprinted autologous cartilage constructs in a rabbit model. The TE cartilage is produced by embedding autologous auricular chondrocytes into hyaluronan transglutaminase (HATG) based bioink, previously shown to support chondrogenesis in human auricular chondrocytes in vitro and in immunocompromised xenotransplantation models in vivo. A drastic softening and loss of cartilage markers, such as sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and collagen type II are observed. Furthermore, fibrous encapsulation and partial degradation of the transplanted constructs are indicative of a strong host immune response to the autologous TE cartilage. The current study thus illustrates the crucial importance of immunocompetent autologous animal models for the evaluation of TE cartilage function and compatibility.

Tissue engineering (TE) techniques offer solutions for tissue regeneration but require large quantities of cells. For microtia patients, TE methods represent a unique opportunity for therapies with low donor-site morbidity and reliance on the surgeon’s individual expertise. Microtia-derived chondrocytes and perichondrocytes are considered a valuable cell source for autologous reconstruction of the pinna. The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of perichondrocytes from microtia patients for autologous reconstruction in comparison to healthy perichondrocytes and microtia chondrocytes. Perichondrocytes were isolated via two different methods: explant culture and enzymatic digestion. The isolated cells were analyzed in vitro for their chondrogenic cell properties. We examined migration activity, colony-forming ability, expression of mesenchymal stem cell markers, and gene expression profile. We found that microtic perichondrocytes exhibit similar chondrogenic properties compared to chondrocytes in vitro. We investigated the behavior in three-dimensional cell cultures (spheroids and scaffold-based 3D cell cultures) and assessed the expression of cartilage-specific proteins via immunohistochemistry, e.g., collagen II, which was detected in all samples. Our results show that perichondrocytes from microtia patients are comparable to healthy perichondrocytes and chondrocytes in terms of chondrogenic cell properties and could therefore be a promising cell source for auricular reconstruction.