Gene therapy is becoming increasingly prevalent, with new gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs) being approved for use every year. Hospital pharmacists are expected to prepare and dispense these products, but there is substantial heterogeneity in the availability of up-to-date, practical guidance at a national level in Europe. Many institutions have no or very limited experience in handling GTMPs. As such, there is a need for updated, practical guidance to aid hospital pharmacy teams in developing institutional standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the safe handling of GTMPs across the entire workflow. Here, we present the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists’ updated guidance on the handling of GTMPs, developed by a team of recognised experts from around Europe. Each aspect of the GTMP handling process is addressed, including receipt and storage, dispensing and reconstitution, transportation, administration, waste disposal, decontamination of spills and accidental exposure. A series of figures are provided to aid the development of practical workflows. This guidance document is intended as a framework to help develop institutional SOPs and should always be used in conjunction with local regulations.
Gene therapy is becoming increasingly prevalent, with new gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs) being approved for use every year. Hospital pharmacists are expected to prepare and dispense these products, but there is substantial heterogeneity in the availability of up-to-date, practical guidance at a national level in Europe. Many institutions have no or very limited experience in handling GTMPs. As such, there is a need for updated, practical guidance to aid hospital pharmacy teams in developing institutional standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the safe handling of GTMPs across the entire workflow. Here, we present the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists’ updated guidance on the handling of GTMPs, developed by a team of recognised experts from around Europe. Each aspect of the GTMP handling process is addressed, including receipt and storage, dispensing and reconstitution, transportation, administration, waste disposal, decontamination of spills and accidental exposure. A series of charts are provided to aid the development of practical workflows. This guidance document is intended as a framework to help develop institutional SOPs and should always be used in conjunction with local regulations.
In 2010, the WHO recommended an increase in the daily doses of first-line anti-tuberculosis medicines in children. We aim to characterize the pharmacokinetics of the once-daily isoniazid (INH) dose at 10 mg/kg of body weight in infants 3 mg/L and 11.6–26.3 h*mg/L) were not reached in three and five cases, respectively. The age at assessment or acetylator status had no impact on Cmax values, but a larger INH AUC0–24h (p = 0.025) and trends towards a longer half-life (p = 0.055) and slower clearance (p = 0.070) were observed in homozygous slow acetylators. Treatment was well tolerated; mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase levels were observed in three cases. In our series of young infants receiving isoniazid, no major safety concerns were raised, and the target adult levels were reached in most patients.
Background: Isoniazid (INH) remains a first-line drug for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) in young children. In 2010, the WHO recommended an increase in the daily dose of INH up to 10 (7–15) mg/kg. Currently, there are no INH suspensions available in Europe. Methods: We aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a licensed INH suspension (10 mg/mL, Pharmascience Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada) in children receiving INH daily at 10 mg/kg in a single-center, open-label, non-randomized, phase IIa clinical trial (EudraCT Number: 2016-002000-31) in Barcelona (Spain). Samples were analyzed using a validated UPLC-UV assay. The N-acetyltransferase 2 gene was examined to determine the acetylation status. A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted. Results: Twenty-four patients (12 females) were included (primary chemoprophylaxis, n = 12; TB treatment, n = 9; and TB infection preventive treatment, n = 3). The acetylator statuses were homozygous fast (n = 3), heterozygous intermediate (n = 18), and homozygous slow (n = 2; unavailable in one patient). The INH median (IQR) Cmax and AUC0–24h values were 6.1 (4.5–8.2) mg/L and 23.0 (11.2–35.4) h∙mg/L; adult targets (>3 mg/L and 11.6–26.3 h∙mg/L) were not achieved in three and six cases, respectively. Gender, age at assessment (2 years), and INH monotherapy (vs. combined TB treatment) had no impact on pharmacokinetic parameters. Significant differences in Cmax (p = 0.030) and AUC0–24h (p = 0.011) values were observed based on acetylator status. Treatment was well tolerated, and no severe adverse events were observed; three patients developed asymptomatic mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. Conclusions: In infants and children receiving a daily INH suspension at 10 mg/kg, no safety concerns were raised, and the target adult levels were reached in the majority of patients.