Background and objectives: induced sputum is used to assess different inflammatory phenotypes in asthma, but is not used routinely. We aimed to determine the proportion of inflammatory asthma phenotypes based on induced sputum, to find biomarkers that can discriminate between phenotypes, and to evaluate biomarkers in patients with and without biological therapy in different inflammatory asthma phenotypes. Materials and Methods: this cross-sectional study investigated clinical characteristics, asthma control tests, skin prick test, impulse oscillometry (IOS), spirometry, induced sputum, biomarkers (IgE, eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), serum periostin, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17A, IL-33) in 80 asthmatics. A total of 17/80 patients were treated with biologics (10 with omalizumab, 7 with benralizumab). Results: a total of 31% of patients had eosinophilic asthma (EA), 30% had mixed granulocytic asthma (MGA), 24% had paucigranulocytic asthma (PGA), and 15% had neutrophilic asthma (NA). The difference was found in blood eosinophils (p = 0.002), the highest observed in EA. The cut-off ≥ 240/μL eosinophils, with 64% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity, identified EA (AUC = 0.743, p = 0.001). A higher IL-8 level was associated with NA (p = 0.025). In 63 non-biologic asthma group, eosinophils were higher in EA than in NA, MGA, and PGA (p = 0.012, p = 0.028, and p = 0.049, respectively). A higher IL-17A was associated with EA without biologics (p = 0.004). A significantly higher IL-5 was found in EA treated with biologics, in comparison with EA without biologics (p = 0.043). The number of leucocytes and neutrophils was higher in MGA without biologics (p = 0.049, p = 0.019), while IL-5, IL-6, and IL-8 levels were higher in MGA treated with biologics (p = 0.012, p = 0.032, p = 0.038, respectively). Conclusions: EA and MGA were the most prevalent asthma phenotypes. Blood eosinophils can identify EA, both in patients with and without biologics. Apart from the clinical profile, a broad spectrum of biomarkers for assessing inflammatory phenotypes is necessary for an adequate therapy approach to patients with asthma.

Introduction: Tryptase is an important biomarker widely used in the laboratory confirmation of severe hypersensitivity reactions, especially anaphylaxis. It also plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, risk stratification, management and prognostic evaluation of many other mast cell-related conditions. Aim: This paper aims to highlight the role of serum tryptase, both in allergic disorders and other mast cell-related conditions. Two clinical cases regarding timely serum tryptase acquisition (in drug hypersensitivity reactions during the imaging procedure and perioperative anaphylaxis) are meant to emphasize the clinical potential of this protease. Method: We performed a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases. From a total of 640 subject related publications, dating from 1940 to 2024, 45 articles written in English were selected. Literature search results: Total serum tryptase is a simple, cost-effective analysis with a normal baseline tryptase (sBT) level below 8.4 µg/L. Elevated sBT can indicate hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT), mastocytosis and other non-allergic disorders. Patients with higher sBT levels, especially with insect venom allergy, have an increased risk of severe reactions and thereby require a prolonged treatment. All immediate systemic hypersensitivity reactions require a correlation between serum acute tryptase (sAT) and sBT. According to the guidelines, measuring sAT 30 min to 2 h after the symptom onset and sBT 24 h after the resolution, using the 20 + 2 rule and an sAT/sBT ratio of 1.685, improves the diagnostic accuracy in anaphylaxis. Conclusions: Tryptase levels should be acquired in all cases with clinical suspicion of MC degranulation. Given the increasing clinical relevance, elevated baseline serum tryptase levels require a multidisciplinary approach and further investigation.

Introduction: Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) consists of a wide spectrum of symptoms and immunological features that are believed to develop in predisposed individuals after exposure to an adjuvant, including a silicone breast implant (SBI). Different autoimmune diseases (AIDs) have been associated with ASIA, but ASIA development after SBI in women with Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) and familial autoimmunity has rarely been described.Case report: A 37-year-old woman presented in 2019 with arthralgia, sicca symptoms, fatigue, + antinuclear antibody (ANA), + anti SSA, and + anticardiolipin Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. She was diagnosed with HT and vitamin D deficiency in 2012. The familial autoimmunity was present: the patient’s mother had been diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus and secondary Sjogren’s syndrome and her grandmother with cutaneous lupus and pernicious anemia. In 2017, the patient had a cosmetic SBI procedure that was complicated by repeated right breast capsulitis. After 2 years of irregular visits due to COVID-19, she presented with + ANA, + anticentromere antibodies both in sera and seroma, sicca syndrome, arthralgias, twinkling in extremities, abnormal capillaroscopic findings, and reduced diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide. She was diagnosed with ASIA, and antimalarial and corticosteroid therapy were introduced.Conclusion: In patients with HT and familial autoimmunity, SBI should be carefully considered due to the possibility of ASIA development. Hashimoto thyroiditis, familial autoimmunity, and ASIA seem to be interconnected in the complex mosaic of autoimmunity in predisposed individuals.

Introduction: Beta(β)-lactam antibiotics are one of the most prescribed medical drugs worldwide. The incidence of self-reported penicillin allergy ranges from 1 to 10 percent. Patients with registered allergy on β-lactam antibiotics are treated with drugs of second choice which are usually more toxic and more expensive. Aim: The aim of this study was to exam the prevalence of penicillin allergy and correlation of clinical, laboratory and socio-demographic characteristic of patients with and without hypersensitivity to penicillin which were available in medical records. Material and methods: This retrospective, descriptive study included consecutive patients, which were treated in Clinic of Allergology and Immunology, Clinical Center of Serbia (CCS), in the period between the years 2010-2015. Anamnestic data of patients with self-reported allergic reaction to penicilin and the rest of β-lactam antibiotics were used, as well as results of in vivo and in vitro tests. Results: 81 patients were evaluated in the study, of which 59 (72.8%) were females. The average age of patients was 41.7±16.47 years. Adverse effects to penicillin were reported by 70/81 (86.4%) tested patients. In accordance with other studies, the most common initial symptoms were rash (exanthema) and angioedema. None of the 70 patients with self-reported allergic reaction to penicillin had positive in vitro tests. Total number of patients with positive in vivo tests is 2/81 (2.5%) Conclusion: Despite a small percentage of positive penicillin hypersensitivity tests of patients with anamnestic data of self-reported allergic reaction, it is necessary to perform in vivo drug provocation test as a gold standard for confirmation of penicillin hypesensitivity in order to reduce the utilization of alternative antimicrobial drugs, the risk of microbial resistance and treatment costs.

Background: Drug desensitization allows for safe administration of a drug to a patient with a previous hypersensitivity reaction. Successful desensitization protocols have been described for different medications, including protocols for oncology patients. Few cases of desensitization to sorafenib and imatinib have been described in the literature so far. Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe the process of the sorafenib and imatinib drug hypersensitivity diagnosis and desensitization process in two patients. Methods: Two oncology patients who experienced non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to sorafenib and imatinib underwent desensitization to these drugs. We designed a protocol for the first patient and used a modified protocol from the literature for the second patient. Results: By using a slow desensitization technique and gradual tapering of corticosteroids and antihistamines, both patients reached the target dose of the incriminated drug. Conclusions: Desensitization to sorafenib and imatinib can be an effective therapeutic option in patients with hypersensitivity to those medications, without alternative treatment options.

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is generally considered a safe treatment modality, with systemic reactions (SRs) representing its most significant adverse events, despite their low incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of SRs associated with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) and to identify potential risk factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 47,982 SCIT injections administered to 317 patients over 468 SCIT courses between January 2019 and January 2024. The study population consisted of 26 patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis sensitized to pollen and/or house dust mites (HDMs), as well as individuals with venom allergies who experienced SRs to SCIT during the study period. Data collected included demographic characteristics, presence of asthma, allergen sensitivities, immunoglobulin E (IgE)-related immunologic biomarkers, and adverse reactions. SRs were classified according to the World Allergy Organization (WAO) SCIT SR Grading System. Results: A total of 26 SCIT-related SRs were documented in 26 patients (57.7% female; mean age 37.3 ± 10.04 years), corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.05% per injection, and 8.2% per patient. Asthma was present in 42.3% of patients. Prior adverse reactions to SCIT were noted in eight patients (30.8%). SRs occurred during the build-up phase in 61.5% of cases, compared with the maintenance phase. In 46.2% of patients, a single allergen was administered, while 53.8% received multiple allergens. Based on the WAO grading system, 30.8% of SRs were classified as grade 1, 42.3% as grade 2, 15.4% as grade 3, and 11.5% as grade 4. No fatalities were reported. The majority of SRs were early onset (88.5%), and epinephrine was administered in 76.9% of the cases. A higher serum specific IgE to total IgE (sIgE/tIgE) ratio was significantly associated with more severe SRs. Conversely, a history of prior allergic reactions to SCIT appeared to correlate with milder SRs. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that SRs to SCIT are rare, and severe reactions are infrequent. A higher serum sIgE/tIgE ratio can be risk factor for severe SRs. Nonetheless, a thorough risk–benefit assessment is essential prior to initiating SCIT, particularly in patients with identified risk factors.