To explore the anti-tumor effects of Radix Astragali on hypopharyngeal carcinoma and its mechanism. We have bioinformatically analyzed the potential targets of Radix Astragali and predicted the molecular mechanism of Radix Astragali treating of hypopharyngeal carcinoma. The binding process of the hub targets that could prolong the survival time of hypopharyngeal cancer patients with Radix Astragali was simulated by molecular docking. The results showed that 17 out of 36 hub targets could effectively improve the 5-year survival rate of hypopharyngeal cancer patients. Radix Astragali acts on hypopharyngeal carcinoma by regulating a signaling network formed by hub targets connecting multiple signaling pathways and is expected to become a drug for treating and prolonging hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients’ survival time.

To explore the hub comorbidity genes and potential pathogenic mechanisms of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with esophageal carcinoma, and evaluate their diagnostic value for hypopharyngeal carcinoma with co-morbid esophageal carcinoma. We performed gene sequencing on tumor tissues from 6 patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (hereafter referred to as “group A”) and 6 patients with pure hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (hereafter referred to as “group B”). We analyzed the mechanism of hub genes in the development and progression of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through bioinformatics, and constructed an ROC curve and Nomogram prediction model to analyze the value of hub genes in clinical diagnosis and treatment. 44,876 genes were sequenced in 6 patients with group A and 6 patients with group B. Among them, 76 genes showed significant statistical differences between the group A and the group B.47 genes were expressed lower in the group A than in the group B, and 29 genes were expressed higher. The top five hub genes were GABRG2, CACNA1A, CNTNAP2, NOS1, and SCN4B. GABRG2, CNTNAP2, and SCN4B in the hub genes have high diagnostic value in determining whether hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients have combined esophageal carcinoma (AUC: 0.944, 0.944, 0.972). These genes could possibly be used as potential molecular markers for assessing the risk of co-morbidity of hypopharyngeal carcinoma combined with esophageal carcinoma.

Objectives: To explore the relationship between CADM1 expression and sensitivity to TPF-induced chemotherapy in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) patients, then investigate its potential mechanisms. Methods: Differential CADM1 expression was examined in chemotherapy-sensitive and chemotherapy-insensitive LSCC patient samples after TPF-induced chemotherapy using microarray analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and bioinformatics approaches were used to investigate the diagnostic value of CADM1. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were used to knock down CADM1 expression in an LSCC cell line. Differential CADM1 expression was compared by qRT-PCR assays in 35 LSCC patients treated with chemotherapy, including 20 chemotherapy-sensitive and 15 chemotherapy-insensitive patients. Results: Public database and primary patient data both suggest that CADM1 mRNA is expressed at lower levels in chemotherapy-insensitive LSCC samples, suggesting its potential usefulness as a biomarker. Knockdown of CADM1 with siRNAs led to decreased sensitivity of LSCC cells to TPF chemotherapy. Conclusions: Upregulation of CADM1 expression can alter the sensitivity of LSCC tumors to TPF induction chemotherapy. CADM1 is a possible molecular marker and therapeutic target for induction chemotherapy in LSCC patients.

Biological targeted therapies show promise for personalized treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the intrinsic heterogeneity of