Background: During orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), applied orthodontic forces cause an extensive remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the periodontal ligament (PDL). This is mainly orchestrated by different types of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs), which are both secreted by periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts. Multiple in vitro and in vivo studies already investigated the influence of applied orthodontic forces on the expression of MMPs and TIMPs. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the expression levels of MMPs and TIMPs during OTM and the influence of specific orthodontic force-related parameters. Methods: Electronic article search was performed on PubMed and Web of Science until 31 January 2021. Screenings of titles, abstracts and full texts were performed according to PRISMA, whereas eligibility criteria were defined for in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively, according to the PICO schema. Risk of bias assessment for in vitro studies was verified by specific methodological and reporting criteria. For in vivo studies, risk of bias assessment was adapted from the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical cross-sectional study. Results: Electronic article search identified 3266 records, from which 28 in vitro and 12 in vivo studies were included. The studies showed that orthodontic forces mainly caused increased MMPs and TIMPs expression levels, whereas the exact effect may depend on various intervention and sample parameters and subject characteristics. Conclusion: This systematic review revealed that orthodontic forces induce a significant effect on MMPs and TIMPs in the PDL. This connection may contribute to the controlled depletion and formation of the PDLs’ ECM at the compression and tension site, respectively, and finally to the highly regulated OTM.

The periodontal ligament (PDL) responds to applied orthodontic forces by extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, in which human periodontal ligament-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hPDL-MSCs) are largely involved by producing matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their local inhibitors (TIMPs). Apart from orthodontic forces, the synthesis of MMPs and TIMPs is influenced by the aseptic inflammation occurring during orthodontic treatment. Interleukin (IL)-1β is one of the most abundant inflammatory mediators in this process and crucially affects the expression of MMPs and TIMPs in the presence of cyclic low-magnitude orthodontic tensile forces. In this study we aimed to investigate, for the first time, how IL-1β induced expression of MMPs, TIMPs and how IL-1β in hPDL-MSCs was changed after applying in vitro low-magnitude orthodontic tensile strains in a static application mode. Hence, primary hPDL-MSCs were stimulated with IL-1β in combination with static tensile strains (STS) with 6% elongation. After 6- and 24 h, MMP-1, MMP-2, TIMP-1 and IL-1β expression levels were measured. STS alone had no influence on the basal expression of investigated target genes, whereas IL-1β caused increased expression of these genes. In combination, they increased the gene and protein expression of MMP-1 and the gene expression of MMP-2 after 24 h. After 6 h, STS reduced IL-1β-induced MMP-1 synthesis and MMP-2 gene expression. IL-1β-induced TIMP-1 gene expression was decreased by STS after 6- and 24-h. At both time points, the IL-1β-induced gene expression of IL-1β was increased. Additionally, this study showed that fetal bovine serum (FBS) caused an overall suppression of IL-1β-induced expression of MMP-1, MMP-2 and TIMP-1. Further, it caused lower or opposite effects of STS on IL-1β-induced expression. These observations suggest that low-magnitude orthodontic tensile strains may favor a more inflammatory and destructive response of hPDL-MSCs when using a static application form and that this response is highly influenced by the presence of FBS in vitro.

Invisalign aligners have been widely used to correct malocclusions, but their effect on oral cells is poorly known. Previous research evaluated the impact of aligners’ eluates on various cells, but the cell behavior in direct contact with aligners is not yet studied. In the present study, we seeded oral epithelial cells (cell line Ca9-22) directly on Invisalign SmartTrack material. This material is composed of polyurethane and co-polyester and exhibit better mechanical characteristics compared to the predecessor. Cell morphology and behavior were investigated by scanning electron microscopy and an optical cell moves analyzer. The effect of aligners on cell proliferation/viability was assessed by cell-counting kit (CCK)-8 and 3,4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and live/dead staining. The expression of inflammatory markers and proteins involved in epithelial barrier function was measured by qPCR. Cells formed cluster-like structures on aligners. The proliferation/viability of cells growing on aligners was significantly lower (p < 0.05) compared to those growing on tissue culture plastic (TCP). Live/dead staining revealed a rare occurrence of dead cells on aligners. The gene expression level of all inflammatory markers in cells grown on aligners’ surfaces was significantly increased (p < 0.05) compared to cells grown on TCP after two days. Gene expression levels of the proteins involved in barrier function significantly increased (p < 0.05) on aligners’ surfaces after two and seven days of culture. Aligners’ material exhibits no cytotoxic effect on oral epithelial cells, but alters their behavior and the expression of proteins involved in the inflammatory response, and barrier function. The clinical relevance of these effects has still to be established.

The objective of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of four orthodontic bonding systems, Light Bond™, Enlight™, Concise™, and Transbond™, and to evaluate their shear bond strength (SBS). These orthodontic bonding materials were applied to metal brackets (Mini Diamond™). Glass specimens were used as controls in all experiments. Only Concise™ was a chemically cured system, the other systems were light cured. The specimens were added to L-929 fibroblast cultures immediately after fabrication or after pre-incubation for 7 days. The incubation time was 72 hours and the cells were counted by flow cytometry. One hundred and fifty-seven freshly extracted human third molars were used for testing the SBS in a universal testing machine. Statistical significance was determined using analysis of variance followed by post hoc comparisons for multiple-level alpha control. Pairwise comparisons showed a significant difference only between Light Bond™ and Concise™ (P = 0.0126). The highest SBS was obtained with Light Bond™ (23.23 ± 1.53 MPa) followed by Transbond™ (20.39 ± 1.18 MPa) and Enlight™, (20.32 ± 1.06 MPa). Concise™ (17.87 ± 1.04 MPa) showed the lowest SBS. The cytotoxicity of all light-cured systems for fresh specimens was comparable, whereas the chemically cured system, Concise™, was significantly more cytotoxic. After 7 days of pre-incubation, all systems were significantly less cyotoxic than fresh specimens (P < 0.001). Brackets alone were not cytotoxic. All bonding systems showed a clinically satisfactory bond strength higher than 10 MPa, with the chemically cured system showing the lowest SBS.

Nano- and microparticles are currently being discussed as potential risk factors for peri-implant disease. In the present study, we compared the responses of human gingival mesenchymal stromal cells (hG-MSCs) on titanium and zirconia nanoparticles (1000 µg/mL) but not the zirconia nanoparticles, which was accompanied by enhanced apoptosis. Both types of nanoparticles (>25 µg/mL) induced the significant expression of IL-8 in gingival MSCs, and a slightly higher effect was observed for titanium nanoparticles. Both nanoparticles substantially enhanced the P. gingivalis LPS-induced IL-8 production; a higher effect was observed for zirconia nanoparticles. The production of inflammatory mediators by hG-MSCs is affected by the nanoparticles. This effect depends on the nanoparticle material and the presence of inflammatory stimuli.

Background: Fragile gingival tissue is a risk factor for the development of gingival recessions. Despite the fact that gingival recessions are more commonly seen around anterior mandibular teeth, previous research has predominantly concentrated on the gingival dimensions in the anterior maxilla. The objective was to systematically compare buccal gingival thicknesses between the upper and lower jaws in individuals with healthy gingival conditions in the aesthetic zone. Methods: A comprehensive search of three databases was carried out until October 2023. Gingival thickness differences between the maxilla and mandible were evaluated by calculating the mean differences along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the measurement area, measurement method, and tooth category. Results: A total of seventeen studies were included in this systematic review. Eleven studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Quantitative analysis comparing gingival thickness around 2100 teeth in the anterior mandible to 2056 teeth in the anterior maxilla revealed a statistically significant thinner buccal gingiva in the mandible (mean difference: 0.16 mm; 95% CI [−0.24, −0.07]; p = 0.0003). Conclusions: The present systematic review revealed a more delicate buccal gingiva in the anterior mandible. However, further scientific validation is required due to the considerable heterogeneity in study design and the potential presence of confounding variables.