➤ Sagittal alignment of the spine has gained attention in the field of spinal deformity surgery for decades. However, emerging data support the importance of restoring segmental lumbar lordosis and lumbar spinal shape according to the pelvic morphology when surgically addressing degenerative lumbar pathologies such as degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis. ➤ The distribution of caudal lordosis (L4-S1) and cranial lordosis (L1-L4) as a percentage of global lordosis varies by pelvic incidence (PI), with cephalad lordosis increasing its contribution to total lordosis as PI increases. ➤ Spinal fusion may lead to iatrogenic deformity if performed without attention to lordosis magnitude and location in the lumbar spine. ➤ A solid foundation of knowledge with regard to optimal spinal sagittal alignment is beneficial when performing lumbar spinal surgery, and thoughtful planning and execution of lumbar fusions with a focus on alignment may improve patient outcomes.

Background: In today’s digital age, patients increasingly rely on online search engines for medical information. The integration of large language models such as GPT-4 into search engines such as Bing raises concerns over the potential transmission of misinformation when patients search for information online regarding spine surgery. Methods: SearchResponse.io, a database that archives People Also Ask (PAA) data from Google, was utilized to determine the most popular patient questions regarding 4 specific spine surgery topics: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, lumbar fusion, laminectomy, and spinal deformity. Bing’s responses to these questions, along with the cited sources, were recorded for analysis. Two fellowship-trained spine surgeons assessed the accuracy of the answers on a 6-point scale and the completeness of the answers on a 3-point scale. Inaccurate answers were re-queried 2 weeks later. Cited sources were categorized and evaluated against Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Interrater reliability was measured with use of the kappa statistic. A linear regression analysis was utilized to explore the relationship between answer accuracy and the type of source, number of sources, and mean JAMA benchmark score. Results: Bing’s responses to 71 PAA questions were analyzed. The average completeness score was 2.03 (standard deviation [SD], 0.36), and the average accuracy score was 4.49 (SD, 1.10). Among the question topics, spinal deformity had the lowest mean completeness score. Re-querying the questions that initially had answers with low accuracy scores resulted in responses with improved accuracy. Among the cited sources, commercial sources were the most prevalent. The JAMA benchmark score across all sources averaged 2.63. Government sources had the highest mean benchmark score (3.30), whereas social media had the lowest (1.75). Conclusions: Bing’s answers were generally accurate and adequately complete, with incorrect responses rectified upon re-querying. The plurality of information was sourced from commercial websites. The type of source, number of sources, and mean JAMA benchmark score were not significantly correlated with answer accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing evaluation and improvement of large language models to ensure reliable and informative results for patients seeking information regarding spine surgery online amid the integration of these models in the search experience.

Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy is a progressive neurological disorder that is commonly encountered in clinical practice and its incidence is expected to increase alongside the aging population. Given the importance of early and accurate diagnosis in this patient population, this narrative review aims to provide a repository of up-to-date information regarding pertinent patient history, physical exam findings, and potential alternate diagnoses. Methods: The PubMed database was queried for publications from 1 January 2019 to 19 March 2024. The search terms utilized are as follows: cervical myelopathy”, “cervical spondylotic myelopathy”, “degenerative cervical myelopathy”, “epidemiology”, “prevalence”, “incidence”, “etiology”, “diagnosis”, “differential”, “symptoms”, “clinical presentation”, and “atypical symptoms”. The resultant articles were reviewed for relevance and redundancy and are presented within the following categories: Natural History, Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management. Results: Myelopathy patients often present with subtle and non-specific symptoms such as sleep disturbances, increased falls, and difficulty driving, which can lead to underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis. Failing to diagnose degenerative cervical myelopathy in a timely manner can result in progressive and irreparable neurological damage. Although many nonoperative treatment modalities are available, surgical decompression is ultimately recommended in most cases to limit further deterioration in neurological function and optimize long-term patient outcomes. Conclusions: A thorough clinical history and physical examination remain the most important diagnostic tools to avoid misdiagnosis and implement early treatment in this patient population.