When vehicles move on a bridge, the coupling effect between vehicles and bridges can affect driving safety and comfort, especially for curved bridges, therefore, choosing reasonable design parameters for curved bridges is crucial. In this article, a three-span curved continuous box-girder bridge was taken as the research object; the entire process of vehicle-bridge coupling vibration of highway curved girder bridges was conducted via numerical simulation and the vehicle-bridge coupling vibration analysis program Cmck 1.0 was developed. Then, the influence factors such as curvature radius, constraint mode, and vehicle characteristics on the vehicle-bridge coupling vibration of curved girder bridges were explored. The results showed that as the curvature radius increased, the dynamic response of the bridge offered a gradually decreasing trend and compared to the vertical dynamic response, the torsional response was more sensitive to the influence of the curvature radius. Different constraint methods significantly impacted the dynamic response of bridges, and the vertical and torsional dynamic responses of bridges under general constraint arrangement of straight bridges were increased compared to those under boundary conditions for curved beam bridges. As the axle load of the car decreases, the bridge mid-span vertical and torsional dynamic responses showed a decreasing trend. In contrast, the lateral dynamic response gradually increased.

Finite element analysis of a 122-meter concrete-filled steel tube arched chord truss bridge was performed using ANSYS to obtain the natural vibration characteristics of the bridge, both before and after reinforcement. In addition, the response spectrum and dynamic time history methods were used to analyze and compare its seismic performance. The results show that the transverse stiffness of the bridge’s main truss was relatively low. After the reinforcement, the vertical and the torsional frequencies of the bridge significantly increased by 24% and 32%, respectively. under the same condition, the axial force at the fixed end of the top chord of the strengthened bridge was reduced by roughly 29%, and the transverse and the vertical displacement at the middle of the top chord span were reduced by roughly 10% and 20%, respectively. Thus, the reinforcement measures significantly improved the vertical stiffness of the bridge. For this bridge, the dynamic time history analysis played a more controlling role in the seismic design. Among the three types of seismic waves, the El Centro wave yielded the largest transverse displacement result and hence, should preferably be used to assess the deflections.

A finite element analysis (FEA) model was developed for Euler and Timoshenko curved beam elements by incorporating trigonometric displacement distribution patterns. Local polar coordinate stiffness matrices were derived based on force-displacement relations and static equilibrium conditions. By employing the kinetic energy theorem and triangular displacement functions, an expression for the consistent mass matrix of a curved beam element was obtained. A coordinate transformation matrix for the curved beam element was established by relating the local polar coordinate system to the global polar coordinate system. Calculation programs were implemented in the Fortran language to evaluate the static–dynamic performance and natural frequency characteristics of curved beam bridges. The obtained results were then compared with those obtained using ANSYS solid models and “replace curve with straight” beam element models. The comparison demonstrated a strong agreement between the results of the Euler and Timoshenko curved beam element models and those of the ANSYS solid models. However, discrepancies were observed when comparing with the results of the “replace curve with straight” beam element model, particularly in terms of lateral static displacement. This discrepancy suggests that the characteristic matrix derived in this study accurately represents the stiffness and mass distribution of the curved beam, making it suitable for mechanical performance analysis of curved beam bridges. It should be noted that the “replace curve with straight” method overlooks the initial curvature and the bending–torsion coupling effects of a curved beam, resulting in calculation deviations. On the other hand, the use of curved beam elements in numerical analysis provides a simple and practical approach, which facilitates further research in areas such as vehicle–bridge coupling vibrations and seismic analysis of curved beam bridges.