Lori A. Erickson

Dr. Lori A. Erickson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 April 2018 in World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael Bingler
Michael Bingler
LELori A. Erickson
Lori A. Erickson
KRKimberly J. Reid
Kimberly J. Reid
BLBrian Lee
Brian Lee
JOJames O’bRien
James O’bRien
GSGirish Shirali
Girish Shirali
Background: Interstage outcomes for infants with single ventricle remain suboptimal. We have previously described a tablet PC-based platform Cardiac High Acuity Monitoring Program (CHAMP) for remote monitoring which provides immediate access to data, videos, and instant alerts to our single ventricle care team. Methods: This study compares traditional three-ring binder monitoring (Binder) to CHAMP using a randomized crossover design to evaluate mortality, resource utilization, and caregiver experience. At discharge, all single ventricle infants were monitored using Binder and randomized to receive CHAMP at either one or two months postdischarge. One month after randomization, caregivers could choose either Binder or CHAMP for the remainder of the interstage period. Caregivers experience was recorded using surveys. Results: Enrollment included 31 single ventricle infants from May 2014 to June 2015. There was no interstage mortality over 4,911 total interstage days (median: 144/patient). Of 73 readmissions, 45 were unplanned. Of the initial 23 unplanned readmissions, 13 were found to have been based on data obtained exclusively through CHAMP (as instant alerts or based on data review) rather than caregiver concerns. Due to concerns regarding patient safety, additional enrollment was stopped. The CHAMP use was associated with significantly fewer unplanned intensive care unit days/100 interstage days, shorter delays in care, lower resource utilization at readmissions, and lower incidence of interstage growth failure and was preferred by a majority of caregivers. Conclusions: These findings suggest that CHAMP may offer benefits over Binder (improved interstage outcomes, delays in care, and caregiver experience). These findings should be tested across multiple centers in larger populations.

14 July 2020 in Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LELori A. Erickson
Lori A. Erickson
AEAmanda Emerson
Amanda Emerson
CRCynthia L. Russell
Cynthia L. Russell

17 August 2021 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADoaa M. Aly
Doaa M. Aly
LELori A. Erickson
Lori A. Erickson
HHHayley Hancock
Hayley Hancock
JAJonathan W. Apperson
Jonathan W. Apperson
MGMonica Gaddis
Monica Gaddis
SGSuma Goudar
Suma Goudar
Background: Our Cardiac High Acuity Monitoring Program (CHAMP) uses home video telemetry (HVT) as an adjunct to monitor infants with single ventricle during the interstage period. This study describes the development of an objective early warning score using HVT, for identification of infants with single ventricle at risk for clinical deterioration and unplanned hospital admissions (UHA). Methods and Results: Six candidate scoring parameters were selected to develop a pragmatic score for routine evaluation of HVT during the interstage period. We evaluated the individual and combined ability of these parameters to predict UHA. All infants with single ventricle monitored at home by CHAMP between March 2014 and March 2018 were included. Videos obtained within 48 hours before UHA were compared with videos obtained at baseline. We used binary logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the parameters' performance in discriminating the outcome of interest. Thirty‐nine subjects with 64 UHA were included. We compared 64 pre‐admission videos to 64 paired baseline videos. Scoring was feasible for a mean of 91.6% (83.6%–98%) of all observations. Three different HVT score models were proposed, and a final model composed of respiratory rate, respiratory effort, color, and behavior exhibited an excellent discriminatory capability with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 93% (89%–98%). HVT score of 5 was associated with specificity of 93.8% and sensitivity of 88.7% in predicting UHA. Conclusions: We developed a feasible and reproducible HVT score that can serve as a tool to predict UHA in infants with single ventricle. Future directions involve prospective, multicenter validation of this tool.

5 December 2023 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BCBianca P Cherestal
Bianca P Cherestal
LELori A. Erickson
Lori A. Erickson
JNJanelle Noel-MacDonnell
Janelle Noel-MacDonnell
GSGirish Shirali
Girish Shirali
HHHayley S. Graue Hancock
Hayley S. Graue Hancock
NJNatalie Jayaram
Natalie Jayaram
Background: Despite improvements in survival over time, the mortality rate for infants with single‐ventricle heart disease remains high. Infants of low socioeconomic status (SES) are particularly vulnerable. We sought to determine whether use of a novel remote monitoring program, the Cardiac High Acuity Monitoring Program, mitigates differences in outcomes by SES. Methods and Results: Within the Cardiac High Acuity Monitoring Program, we identified 610 infants across 11 centers from 2014 to 2021. All enrolled families had access to a mobile application allowing for near‐instantaneous transfer of patient information to the care team. Patients were divided into SES tertiles on the basis of 6 variables relating to SES. Hierarchical logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounding characteristics, was used to determine the association between SES and death or transplant listing during the interstage period. Of 610 infants, 39 (6.4%) died or were listed for transplant. In unadjusted analysis, the rate of reaching the primary outcome between SES tertiles was similar ( P =0.24). Even after multivariable adjustment, the odds of death or transplant listing were no different for those in the middle (odds ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 0.73–3.94) or highest (odds ratio, 0.997 [95% CI, 0.30, 3.36]) SES tertile compared with patients in the lowest (overall P value 0.4). Conclusions: In a large multicenter cohort of infants with single‐ventricle heart disease enrolled in a digital remote monitoring program during the interstage period, we found no difference in outcomes based on SES. Our study suggests that this novel technology could help mitigate differences in outcomes for this fragile population of patients.

11 October 2022 in Western Journal of Nursing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LELori A. Erickson
Lori A. Erickson
ARAmy Ricketts
Amy Ricketts
TSTara Swanson
Tara Swanson
JWJulie Weiner
Julie Weiner
UHUsman A. Hasnie
Usman A. Hasnie
CRCynthia L. Russell
Cynthia L. Russell
After neonatal cardiac surgery, families, and the health care team strive for exclusive oral feedings before hospital discharge. With the hypothesis that exclusive oral feedings would reduce the length of stay (LOS), a multidimensional path analysis was used to examine a cross-section of 280 neonates from 2009 to 2013. Buttigieg, Abela, and Pace’s theoretical framework of structural and process-related determinants of LOS was modeled with hypothesis-driven correlation and directionality. The recursive path model had a good global and local fit with outcome variances of 26% for exclusive oral feeding and LOS. In the full cohort and model groups (single and biventricular), when controlling for covariances: sepsis, birth distance, necrotizing enterocolitis, genetic differences, specialty consults, the age at which neonatal cardiac surgery occurred (β = .23, p ≤ .001) and the duration of postoperative intubation (β = .47, p ≤ .001) more significantly influenced the LOS than intermediate mediation of exclusive oral feedings at discharge.

8 July 2023 in Pediatric Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPParth S. Patel
Parth S. Patel
SSShil K. Shah
Shil K. Shah
KFKeith Feldman
Keith Feldman
HHHayley S. Hancock
Hayley S. Hancock
MMMatthew L. Moehlmann
Matthew L. Moehlmann
RRRyan A. Romans
Ryan A. Romans