Eman Leung

Dr. Eman Leung


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2009 in Child Abuse & Neglect
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWChristine Wekerle
Christine Wekerle
ELEman Leung
Eman Leung
AWAnne-Marie Wall
Anne-Marie Wall
HMHarriet MacMillan
Harriet MacMillan
MBMichael Boyle
Michael Boyle
RWRandall Waechter
Randall Waechter

1 October 2003 in Biological Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSusan Goldberg
Susan Goldberg
RLRobert Levitan
Robert Levitan
ELEman Leung
Eman Leung
MMMario Masellis
Mario Masellis
VBVincenzo S. Basile
Vincenzo S. Basile
LALeslie Atkinson
Leslie Atkinson

1 January 2005 in Developmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALeslie Atkinson
Leslie Atkinson
SGSusan Goldberg
Susan Goldberg
VRVaishali Raval
Vaishali Raval
DPDavid Pederson
David Pederson
DBDiane Benoit
Diane Benoit
ELEman Leung
Eman Leung
Attachment theorists assume that maternal mental representations influence responsivity, which influences infant attachment security. However, primary studies do not support this mediation model. The authors tested mediation using 2 mother-infant samples and found no evidence of mediation. Therefore, the authors explored sensitivity as a moderator, studying the (a) interaction of mental representation and sensitivity as it predicts infant attachment security and (b) level of sensitivity in mothers whose infants' attachment security is either concordant or discordant with their own. The interactional analyses were not significant. But the match-mismatch data showed that when mother-infant attachment strategies were discordant, maternal sensitivity was more consistent with infant than maternal attachment strategy. These findings are congruent with an interpretation of sensitivity as a moderator that can block transmission of attachment strategy.

1 April 2007 in Child Abuse & Neglect
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWChristine Wekerle
Christine Wekerle
AWAnne-Marie Wall
Anne-Marie Wall
ELEman Leung
Eman Leung
NTNico Trocmé
Nico Trocmé

1 August 2011 in Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMasako Tanaka
Masako Tanaka
CWChristine Wekerle
Christine Wekerle
ELEman Leung
Eman Leung
RWRandall Waechter
Randall Waechter
AGAndrea Gonzalez
Andrea Gonzalez
HMHarriet L. MacMillan
Harriet L. MacMillan
Despite advances in child maltreatment research, accurate measurement of exposure remains a key issue. In this study, we evaluated a short form (CEVQ-SF) of the Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire (CEVQ) in a sample of adolescents involved with child protection services in an urban city in Ontario, Canada. Focusing on the two most readily defined maltreatment types, physical and sexual abuse, we evaluated the short form’s comparability with the full version of the CEVQ. Both versions had good internal consistency and moderate-to-good 2-week test-retest reliability. The criterion validity of the two CEVQ versions in comparison with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire was satisfactory. Construct validity for both versions was demonstrated: physically and sexually abused youth had higher odds of reporting clinical traumatic symptoms compared with either type alone. The CEVQ-SF is as reliable and valid as its full version. Implications for its use in large population-based surveys are discussed.

8 February 2013 in BMC Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAnna Taddio
Anna Taddio
VSVibhuti Shah
Vibhuti Shah
ELEman Leung
Eman Leung
JWJane Wang
Jane Wang
CPChaitya Parikh
Chaitya Parikh
LFLinda Franck
Linda Franck
Although numerous evidence-based and feasible interventions are available to treat pain from childhood vaccine injections, evidence indicates that children are not benefitting from this knowledge. Unrelieved vaccination pain puts children at risk for significant long-term harms including the development of needle fears and subsequent health care avoidance behaviours. Parents report that while they want to mitigate vaccination pain in their children, they lack knowledge about how to do so. An evidence-based clinical practice guideline for managing vaccination pain was recently developed in order to address this knowledge-to-care gap. Educational tools (pamphlet and video) for parents were included to facilitate knowledge transfer at the point of care. The objectives of this study were to evaluate usability and effectiveness in terms of knowledge acquisition from the pamphlet and video in parents of newly born infants. Mixed methods design. Following heuristic usability evaluation of the pamphlet and video, parents of newborn infants reviewed revised versions of both tools and participated in individual and group interviews and individual knowledge testing. The knowledge test comprised of 10 true/false questions about the effectiveness of various pain management interventions, and was administered at three time points: at baseline, after review of the pamphlet, and after review of the video. Three overarching themes were identified from the interviews regarding usability of these educational tools: receptivity to learning, accessibility to information, and validity of information. Parents’ performance on the knowledge test improved (p≤0.001) from the baseline phase to after review of the pamphlet, and again from the pamphlet review phase to after review of the video. Using a robust testing process, we demonstrated usability and conceptual knowledge acquisition from a parent-directed educational pamphlet and video about management of vaccination pain. Future studies are planned to determine the impact of these educational tools when introduced in clinical settings on parent behaviors during infant vaccinations.