Nicholas Kitchin

Dr. Nicholas Kitchin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 October 2021 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAnn R. Falsey
Ann R. Falsey
RFRobert W. Frenck
Robert W. Frenck
EWEdward E. Walsh
Edward E. Walsh
NKNicholas Kitchin
Nicholas Kitchin
JAJudith Absalon
Judith Absalon
WGWilliam C. Gruber
William C. Gruber
We conducted a global, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1–2–3 pivotal trial in which two 30-μg doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) were administered 21 days apart (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728). These doses of vaccine had mainly low-grade side effects and provided 95% efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) from 7 days to approximately 2 months after dose 2.1 Efficacy waned to 84% between 4 and approximately 6 months after dose 2.2 Since vaccine authorization, viral variants have replaced the original strain, with the highly transmissible B.1.617.2 (delta) variant currently dominant.3 Although the effectiveness of the vaccine against severe disease, hospitalization, and death remains high, waning immunity and viral diversification create a possible need for a third vaccine dose.

1 July 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MMMark J. Mulligan
Mark J. Mulligan
KLKirsten E. Lyke
Kirsten E. Lyke
NKNicholas Kitchin
Nicholas Kitchin
JAJudith Absalon
Judith Absalon
AGAlejandra Gurtman
Alejandra Gurtman
OTOzlem Tuereci
Ozlem Tuereci
In March 2020, the WHO declared a pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). 1 With >8.8 million cases and >450,000 deaths reported globally, a vaccine is urgently needed. We report the available safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity data from an ongoing placebo-controlled, observer-blinded dose escalation study among healthy adults, 18-55 years of age, randomized to receive 2 doses, separated by 21 days, of 10 μg, 30 μg, or 100 μg of BNT162b1, a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified, mRNA vaccine that encodes trimerized SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein RBD. Local reactions and systemic events were dose-dependent, generally mild to moderate, and transient. RBD-binding IgG concentrations and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titers in sera increased with dose level and after a second dose. Geometric mean neutralizing titers reached 1.8-to 2.8-fold that of a panel of COVID-19 convalescent human sera. These results support further evaluation of this mRNA vaccine candidate.

1 April 2016 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEric Sheldon
Eric Sheldon
NKNicholas Kitchin
Nicholas Kitchin
YPYahong Peng
Yahong Peng
JEJoseph Eiden
Joseph Eiden
WGWilliam Gruber
William Gruber
LPLouise Pedneault
Louise Pedneault

24 December 2021 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Stephen ThomasStephen Thomas
Stephen Thomas
JPJohn L. Perez
John L. Perez
SLStephen P. Lockhart
Stephen P. Lockhart
SHSubramanian Hariharan
Subramanian Hariharan
NKNicholas Kitchin
Nicholas Kitchin
WGWilliam Carl Gruber
William Carl Gruber
Individuals with an underlying malignancy have high risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes. In clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious against infection, hospitalization, and death, but most trials excluded participants with cancer. We report results from participants with a history of past or active neoplasm (malignant or benign/unknown) and up to 6 months’ follow-up post-dose 2 from the placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial of the 2-dose BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Between July 2020–January 2021, 46,429 participants aged ≥ 12 years were randomized at 152 sites in 6 countries. Healthy participants with pre-existing stable neoplasm could participate; those receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Data are reported for participants, aged ≥ 16 years for safety and ≥ 12 years for efficacy, who had any history of neoplasm at baseline (data cut-off: March 13, 2021). Adverse-event (AE) data are controlled for follow-up time before unblinding and reported as incidence rates (IRs) per 100 person-years follow-up. At baseline, 3813 participants had a history of neoplasm; most common malignancies were breast (n = 460), prostate (n = 362), and melanoma (n = 223). Four BNT162b2 and 71 placebo recipients developed COVID-19 from 7 days post-dose 2; vaccine efficacy was 94.4% (95% CI: 85.2, 98.5) after up to 6 months’ follow-up post-dose 2. This compares favorably with vaccine efficacy of 91.1% in the overall trial population after the same follow-up. AEs were reported at IRs of 95.4 (BNT162b2) and 48.3 (placebo) per 100 person-years. Most common AEs were reactogenicity events (injection-site pain, fatigue, pyrexia). Three BNT162b2 and 1 placebo recipients withdrew because of vaccine-related AEs. No vaccine-related deaths were reported. In participants with past or active neoplasms, BNT162b2 vaccine has a similar efficacy and safety profile as in the overall trial population. These results can inform BNT162b2 use during the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials in participants with cancer. Clinical trial number: NCT04368728.

24 January 2024 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJuleen Gayed
Juleen Gayed
ODOyeniyi Diya
Oyeniyi Diya
FLFrancine S. Lowry
Francine S. Lowry
XXXia Xu
Xia Xu
VBVishva Bangad
Vishva Bangad
NKNicholas Kitchin
Nicholas Kitchin
Vaccination remains an important mitigation tool against COVID-19. We report 1-month safety and preliminary immunogenicity data from a substudy of an ongoing, open-label, phase 2/3 study of monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 (single 30-μg dose). Healthy participants ≥12 years old (N = 412 (12–17 years, N = 30; 18–55 years, N = 174; >55 years, N = 208)) who previously received ≥3 doses of a US-authorized mRNA vaccine, the most recent being an Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent vaccine ≥150 days before study vaccination, were vaccinated. Serum 50% neutralizing titers against Omicron XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 were measured 7 days and 1 month after vaccination in a subset of ≥18-year-olds (N = 40) who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline. Seven-day immunogenicity was also evaluated in a matched group who received bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 in a previous study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05472038). There were no new safety signals; local reactions and systemic events were mostly mild to moderate in severity, adverse events were infrequent, and none led to study withdrawal. The XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 induced numerically higher titers against Omicron XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 than BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 at 7 days and robust neutralizing responses to all three sublineages at 1 month. These data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 30 μg. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05997290

1 May 2011 in Expert Review of Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKNicholas Kitchin
Nicholas Kitchin
Diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines have formed the cornerstone of childhood immunization programs for decades. Historically, these have comprised diphtheria and tetanus toxoids combined with inactivated whole-cell pertussis. More recently, advances have been made with the development of purified acellular pertussis vaccines, with improved reactogenicity profiles, and formulation with additional vaccines such as Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B virus and inactivated poliovirus. Development is currently focused on maximizing the number of vaccines that can be combined in a single formulation and strategies to provide protection against pertussis before the commencement of routine infant immunization.