Children represent only a small proportion of those infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) compared to adults. Nevertheless, a substantial number of children have chronic HCV infection and are at risk of complications including cirrhosis, portal hypertension, hepatic decompensation with hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatocellular carcinoma in adulthood. The overall prevalence of the HCV in children was estimated to be 0.87% worldwide. The HCV spreads through the blood. Children born to women with chronic hepatitis C should be evaluated and tested for HCV due to the known risk of infection. The course of treatment for hepatitis C depends on the type of HCV. Currently, there are two pan-genotype HCV treatments (Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir) for children. We aim to review the updated clinical guidelines on the management of HCV infection in children, including screening, diagnosis, and long-term monitoring, as well as currently published clinical trials and ongoing research on direct acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment in children.

The development of a hepatitis E vaccine is imperative given its prevalence and the heightened risk it poses to specific populations. Hepatitis E virus infection, though often self-limiting, poses a significant threat to pregnant individuals and immunocompromised populations. This review delves into the historical trajectory of hepatitis E vaccine development and explores its potential impact on at-risk populations. Historically, efforts to formulate an effective vaccine against hepatitis E have been underway to mitigate the severity of the disease, particularly in regions where the infection is commonplace. As a self-limiting disease, the necessity of a vaccine becomes more pronounced when considering vulnerable demographics. Pregnant individuals face heightened complications, with potential adverse outcomes for both mother and child. Similarly, immunocompromised individuals experience prolonged and severe manifestations of the infection, necessitating targeted preventive measures. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the milestones in hepatitis E vaccine development. By examining the historical progression, we aim to underscore the critical need for a vaccine to safeguard not only the general population but also those at elevated risk. The elucidation of the vaccine’s journey will contribute valuable insights into its potential benefits, aiding in the formulation of informed public health strategies to combat hepatitis E effectively.

Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of peripheral vasopressor administration in an attempt to minimize the placement and improve early removal of unnecessary central lines to reduce central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who received vasopressors via peripheral infusion over 3 months, starting at the time of guideline implementation. Results: We identified 129 vasopressor orders among 79 patients that were administered peripherally. Among these orders, 3 events were documented as possible extravasation events. Forty-five patients (57%) did not require central line placement due to increasing vasopressor requirements. Standard utilization ratio data suggest minimal central line impact of the protocol implementation. December 2020 to February 2021 was associated with a large second peak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in our region. Utilization of central lines was less than predicted in December 2020 to February 2021 in 2 of our 3 intensive care units (ICUs); however, the differences were statistically significant on only 3 occasions. In the third ICU, utilization was greater than predicted, but this unit housed a majority of the most critically ill patients with COVID-19. Conclusion: This study suggests that short-term use of select vasopressors at conservative doses is safe for peripheral administration and points toward efficacy at preventing central line placement. Further analysis is required to confirm efficacy.

Prior to the Food and Drug Administration approval of ledipaspavir/sofosbuvir (Harvoni^®) in 2014, the treatment of hepatitis C was interferon plus or minus ribavirin. This treatment had low cure rates for hepatitis C virus and was teratogenic and therefore avoided in pregnant patients. Vertical transmission is the most common transmission of hepatitis C in pediatric patients, whereas medical equipment that was not properly cleaned and sterilized, blood products which were not checked (historically), sharing and reusing syringes and needles, and dialysis are the most common forms of hepatitis C transmission in adults. The treatment of pregnant women with direct-acting antivirals is important because the treatment of pediatric patients cannot begin until three years of age and does not always occur prior to the symptom development of hepatitis C. This review article will include glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mayvret^®), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (Epclusa^®), and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir plus voxilaprevir (Vosevi^®). We aim to review the teratogenic risk of direct-acting antivirals as well as currently published clinical trials and ongoing research on direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment in pregnancy in this publication.

Elizabethkingia anophelis is a Gram-negative bacillus that can exhibit highly resistant phenotypes against most antibiotics with evidence of efficacy and safety in the neonatal population. Given the limited antimicrobial options, clinicians may be forced into challenging treatment scenarios when faced with central nervous system infections in premature neonates caused by E. anophelis. We report a case of successful treatment of hospital-acquired meningitis and bacteremia caused by E. anophelis at 11 days of life in a male infant born at 29 weeks, 1 day gestation and birth weight of 1.41 kg. Therapy consisted of vancomycin, dose adjusted to maintain goal troughs of 15–20 mg/L, and rifampin 10 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours, with ciprofloxacin 15 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 5 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours added due to antimicrobial susceptibilities and unsatisfactory response, for a total of 21 days. Following initiation of this multidrug regimen, repeat cultures were negative, laboratory parameters improved [with exception of elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell count], the patient remained otherwise stable, and there were no adverse effects noted from therapy. Complications after treatment included the requirement of bilateral hearing aids and the development of hydrocephalus necessitating ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. To our knowledge, we report the first case of meningitis in a premature neonate initially identified as E. anophelis in the United States treated with this regimen which led to successful microbiologic eradication with no antimicrobial safety concerns.

Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), and varicella incidence rates have increased due to the delayed vaccination schedules of children secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic. Decreased herd immunity creates a risk for immunocompetent children and immunocompromised individuals in the community. Historically, live-attenuated vaccines (MMR and varicella) were recommended before solid organ transplants. The amount of time before transplant when this is appropriate is often debated, as is the utility of vaccine titers. MMR and varicella vaccines previously were not recommended in immunocompromised patients post-solid organ transplant due to the undue risk of transmission and posed infection risk. The new literature on live-attenuated vaccines in post-transplant pediatric patients provides more insight into the vaccines’ safety and efficacy. The present article aims to provide guidance on live-attenuated vaccines (MMR and varicella) in the pre-transplant and post-operative solid organ transplant phases of care in pediatric patients.