Leonardo Galetto

Dr. Leonardo Galetto


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2006 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARamiro Aguilar
Ramiro Aguilar
LALorena Ashworth
Lorena Ashworth
LGLeonardo Galetto
Leonardo Galetto
MAMarcelo Adrián Aizen
Marcelo Adrián Aizen

16 August 2021 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LDLynn Dicks
Lynn Dicks
TBTom D. Breeze
Tom D. Breeze
HNHien T. Ngo
Hien T. Ngo
DSDeepa Senapathi
Deepa Senapathi
JAJiandong An
Jiandong An
SPSimon G Potts
Simon G Potts

13 May 2009 in Apidologie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BFBreno M. Freitas
Breno M. Freitas
VIVera Lúcia Imperatriz-Fonseca
Vera Lúcia Imperatriz-Fonseca
LMLuis A. Medina-Medina
Luis A. Medina-Medina
AKAstrid de Matos Peixoto Kleinert
Astrid de Matos Peixoto Kleinert
LGLeonardo Galetto
Leonardo Galetto
JQJ. Javier G. Quezada-Euán
J. Javier G. Quezada-Euán

28 October 2019 in Nature Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMatias Mastrangelo
Matias Mastrangelo
NPNatalia Pérez-Harguindeguy
Natalia Pérez-Harguindeguy
LELucas Enrico
Lucas Enrico
EBElena Bennett
Elena Bennett
SLSandra Lavorel
Sandra Lavorel
KZKim Zoeller
Kim Zoeller

25 November 2016 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LDLynn Dicks
Lynn Dicks
BVBlandina Viana
Blandina Viana
RBRiccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco
BBBerry Brosi
Berry Brosi
MAMaría del Coro Arizmendi
María del Coro Arizmendi
SPSimon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts
Earlier this year, the first global thematic assessment from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) evaluated the state of knowledge about pollinators and pollination (1, 2). It confirmed evidence of large-scale wild pollinator declines in northwest Europe and North America and identified data shortfalls and an urgent need for monitoring elsewhere in the world. With high-level political commitments to support pollinators in the United States (3), the United Kingdom (4), and France (5); encouragement from the Convention on Biological Diversity's (CBD's) scientific advice body (6); and the issue on the agenda for next month's Conference of the Parties to the CBD, we see a chance for global-scale policy change. We extend beyond the IPBES report, which we helped to write, and suggest 10 policies that governments should seriously consider to protect pollinators and secure pollination services. Our suggestions are not the only available responses but are those we consider most likely to succeed, because of synergy with international policy objectives and strategies or formulation of international policy creating opportunities for change. We make these suggestions as independent scientists and not on behalf of IPBES.

22 December 2005 in Annals of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VCVanina R. Chalcoff
Vanina R. Chalcoff
MAMarcelo A. Aizen
Marcelo A. Aizen
LGLeonardo Galetto
Leonardo Galetto
• Background and Aims Floral nectar concentration and chemical composition of 26 plant species native to the temperate forest of southern South America are reported and the relationships with the flower type are evaluated. • Methods Nectar concentration was measured with a hand refractometer and sugar composition was analysed by gas–liquid chromatography. Plant species were classified into flower type categories based not only on floral features but also on data from the literature and field observations on their pollinators. • Key Results Most data on nectar are new reports at the generic and/or specific level. Plant species in which more than one population was studied showed significant among-population variation in nectar sugar concentration and composition. Results showed a weak relationship between nectar traits and flower type. Many species had nectar containing 50 % or more sucrose (17 of 26 species), independent of the main pollinator. • Conclusions Considering that (a) nectar characteristics did not show a clear association with different flower types or with plant taxonomic membership, and (b) different populations of the same species showed large variability in sugar composition, the results suggest that other factors (e.g. historical and environmental) could be involved in determining the sugar composition of the highly endemic plant species from this region.