Pascal Duijf

Prof. Pascal Duijf

Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 1999 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJacopo Celli
Jacopo Celli
Pascal DuijfPascal Duijf
Pascal Duijf
BHBen C.J Hamel
Ben C.J Hamel
MBMichael Bamshad
Michael Bamshad
BKBridget Kramer
Bridget Kramer
Hans Van BokhovenHans Van Bokhoven
Hans Van Bokhoven

1 February 2001 in Human Molecular Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJohn A. McGrath
John A. McGrath
Pascal DuijfPascal Duijf
Pascal Duijf
VDVolker Doetsch
Volker Doetsch
Alan IrvineAlan Irvine
Alan Irvine
RWRob de Waal
Rob de Waal
Hans Van BokhovenHans Van Bokhoven
Hans Van Bokhoven
Hay–Wells syndrome, also known as ankyloblepharon–ectodermal dysplasia-clefting (AEC) syndrome (OMIM 106260), is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by congenital ectodermal dysplasia, including alopecia, scalp infections, dystrophic nails, hypodontia, ankyloblepharon and cleft lip and/or cleft palate. This constellation of clinical signs is unique, but some overlap can be recognized with other ectodermal dysplasia syndromes, for example ectrodactyly–ectodermal dysplasia–cleft lip/palate (EEC; OMIM 604292), limb–mammary syndrome (LMS; OMIM 603543), acro-dermato-ungual-lacrimal-tooth syndrome (ADULT; OMIM 103285) and recessive cleft lip/palate–ectodermal dysplasia (CLPED1; OMIM 225060). We have recently demonstrated that heterozygous mutations in the p63 gene are the major cause of EEC syndrome. Linkage studies suggest that the related LMS and ADULT syndromes are also caused by mutations in the p63 gene. Thus, it appears that p63 gene mutations have highly pleiotropic effects. We have analysed p63 in AEC syndrome patients and identified missense mutations in eight families. All mutations give rise to amino acid substitutions in the sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain, and are predicted to affect protein–protein interactions. In contrast, the vast majority of the mutations found in EEC syndrome are amino acid substitutions in the DNA-binding domain. Thus, a clear genotype–phenotype correlation can be recognized for EEC and AEC syndromes.

1 September 2001 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hans Van BokhovenHans Van Bokhoven
Hans Van Bokhoven
BHBen C.J. Hamel
Ben C.J. Hamel
MBMike Bamshad
Mike Bamshad
ESEugenio Sangiorgi
Eugenio Sangiorgi
FIORELLA GURRIERIFIORELLA GURRIERI
FIORELLA GURRIERI
HBHan G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner

9 March 2018 in Journal of Cellular Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NHNayer Hosseinahli
Nayer Hosseinahli
MAMahyar Aghapour
Mahyar Aghapour
Pascal DuijfPascal Duijf
Pascal Duijf
Behzad BaradaranBehzad Baradaran
Behzad Baradaran

13 February 2021 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBehzad Mansoori
Behzad Mansoori
AMAli Mohammadi
Ali Mohammadi
HDHenrik Ditzel
Henrik Ditzel
Pascal DuijfPascal Duijf
Pascal Duijf
VSVahid Khaze Shahgoli
Vahid Khaze Shahgoli
Behzad BaradaranBehzad Baradaran
Behzad Baradaran
The high mobility group protein 2 (HMGA2) regulates gene expression by binding to AT-rich regions of DNA. Akin to other DNA architectural proteins, HMGA2 is highly expressed in embryonic stem cells during embryogenesis, while its expression is more limited at later stages of development and in adulthood. Importantly, HMGA2 is re-expressed in nearly all human malignancies, where it promotes tumorigenesis by multiple mechanisms. HMGA2 increases cancer cell proliferation by promoting cell cycle entry and inhibition of apoptosis. In addition, HMGA2 influences different DNA repair mechanisms and promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by activating signaling via the MAPK/ERK, TGFβ/Smad, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, NFkB, and STAT3 pathways. Moreover, HMGA2 supports a cancer stem cell phenotype and renders cancer cells resistant to chemotherapeutic agents. In this review, we discuss these oncogenic roles of HMGA2 in different types of cancers and propose that HMGA2 may be used for cancer diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic purposes.

1 December 2002 in Molecular and Cellular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PGPamela Ghioni
Pamela Ghioni
FBFabrizio Bolognese
Fabrizio Bolognese
Pascal DuijfPascal Duijf
Pascal Duijf
Hans Van BokhovenHans Van Bokhoven
Hans Van Bokhoven
RMRoberto Mantovani
Roberto Mantovani
LGLuisa Guerrini
Luisa Guerrini
P63 is a transcription factor structurally related to the p53 tumor suppressor. The C-terminal region differs from p539s in that it contains a sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain and is subject to multiple alternative splicings. The N-terminal region is present in the transactivation (TA) and ΔN configurations, with the latter lacking the transcriptional activation domain 1. Single amino acid substitutions and frameshift mutations of p63 cause the human ankyloblepharon ectodermal dysplasia clefting (AEC) or ectrodactyly ectodermal dysplasia and facial clefting (EEC) syndromes. We have systematically compared the activities of the wild-type p63 isoforms and of the natural mutants in activation and repression assays on three promoters modulated by p53. We found that p63 proteins with an altered SAM domain or no SAM domain—the β isoforms, the EEC frameshift mutant, and the missense AEC mutations—all showed a distinctly higher level of activation of the MDM2 promoter and decreased repression on the HSP70 promoter. Fusion of SAM to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain repressed a heterologous promoter. A second activation domain, TA2, corresponding to exons 11 to 12, was uncovered by comparing the activation of ΔN isoforms on natural promoters and in GAL4 fusion systems. In colony formation assays, the AEC mutants, but not the EEC frameshift, were consistently less efficient in suppressing growth, in both the TA version and the ΔN version, with respect to their p63α counterparts. These data highlight the modularity of p63, identifying the SAM domain as a dominant transcriptional repression module and indicating that the AEC and EEC frameshift mutants are characterized by a subversion of the p63 transcriptional potential.