Tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors are used to treat chronic pain, such as neuropathic pain. Why antidepressants are effective for treatment of neuropathic pain and the precise mechanisms underlying their effects, however, remain unclear. The inhibitory effects of these antidepressants for neuropathic pain manifest more quickly than their antidepressive effects, suggesting different modes of action. Recent studies of animal models of neuropathic pain revealed that noradrenaline is extremely important for the inhibition of neuropathic pain. First, increasing noradrenaline in the spinal cord by reuptake inhibition directly inhibits neuropathic pain through α₂-adrenergic receptors. Second, increasing noradrenaline acts on the locus coeruleus and improves the function of an impaired descending noradrenergic inhibitory system. Serotonin and dopamine may reinforce the noradrenergic effects to inhibit neuropathic pain. The mechanisms of neuropathic pain inhibition by antidepressants based mainly on experimental findings from animal models of neuropathic pain are discussed in this review.

Gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) and antidepressants (tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors) are often used to treat chronic pain. The descending noradrenergic inhibitory system from the locus coeruleus (LC) to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord plays an important role in the analgesic mechanisms of these drugs. Gabapentinoids activate the LC by inhibiting the release of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and inducing the release of glutamate, thereby increasing noradrenaline levels in the spinal cord. Antidepressants increase noradrenaline levels in the spinal cord by inhibiting reuptake, and accumulating noradrenaline inhibits chronic pain through α₂-adrenergic receptors in the spinal cord. Recent animal studies, however, revealed that the function of the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system is impaired in chronic pain states. Other recent studies found that histone deacetylase inhibitors and antidepressants restore the impaired noradrenergic descending inhibitory system acting on noradrenergic neurons in the LC.

BACKGROUND: The tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline, the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor duloxetine, and gabapentinoids are first-line drugs for treatment of neuropathic pain. The analgesic effect of these drugs relates to brainstem-spinal descending noradrenergic systems. However, amitriptyline utilizes a variety of mechanisms for analgesia in neuropathic pain, and it is unclear which mechanism is most important. In the present study, we investigated the role of descending noradrenergic systems in the analgesic effect of these drugs for treatment of neuropathic pain. We also examined whether amitriptyline modifies the descending noradrenergic systems. METHODS: Seven days after L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL), rats received N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine (DSP-4, 50 mg/kg) to degenerate noradrenergic fibers. The rats then received 5 daily intraperitoneal injections of amitriptyline (10 mg/kg), duloxetine (10 mg/kg), pregabalin (10 mg/kg), or gabapentin (50 mg/kg) from 21 days after SNL surgery. Paw withdrawal thresholds were determined to assess the effect of the drugs on hyperalgesia after SNL. To determine whether 5 daily injections of amitriptyline activated noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (LC) and spinal cord with or without DSP-4 treatment, we performed immunohistochemistry using antibodies for c-Fos and dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DβH). RESULTS: Five daily injections of amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, and gabapentin exerted antihyperalgesic effects in SNL rats (P < .001; estimated treatment effect of amitriptyline [99% confidence interval]: 59.9 [35.1–84.7] g). The antihyperalgesic effects of duloxetine, pregabalin, and gabapentin were reversed by pretreatment with DSP-4 (P < .001, respectively). However, antihyperalgesia was still observed after treatment of amitriptyline in SNL rats with DSP-4 pretreatment (P < .001, 59.7 [30.0–89.3] g), and this analgesic effect was not reversed by the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan (30 μg). Additionally, 5 daily injections of amitriptyline increased the ratio of c-Fos-immunoreactive (IR) cells in noradrenergic LC neurons in SNL rats with or without DSP-4 pretreatment (P < .001, respectively). Five daily injections of amitriptyline increased DβH-IR in the LC and the spinal dorsal horn of SNL rats (P < .001, respectively). With DSP-4 pretreatment, DβH-IR was dramatically decreased with or without 5 daily injections of amitriptyline (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Five daily injections of amitriptyline produced antihyperalgesic effects against neuropathic pain despite suppression of noradrenergic descending inhibitory systems. Amitriptyline activated LC neurons and increased noradrenergic fibers density in SNL rats. These results suggest that amitriptyline could still produce analgesia under pathological dysfunction of the descending noradrenergic system. Amitriptyline may enhance the analgesic effect of drugs for neuropathic pain that require normal descending noradrenergic inhibition to produce analgesia, such as serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and gabapentinoids.

This is a narrative conceptual paper, not a systematic review. Ultrasound-guided fascial hydrorelease (FHR) has been reported to provide sustained pain relief in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain; however, its underlying biological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. In this paper, we propose the “Fascial Memory Reset Hypothesis” as an integrative framework linking mechanobiology, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, peripheral nociception, microcirculatory dynamics, and ultrasound imaging findings. Mechanobiological research has demonstrated that increased tissue stiffness activates YAP/TAZ signaling, promoting fibroblast activation, ECM deposition, and mechano-epigenetic regulation. These mechanically driven processes can stabilize pathological tissue phenotypes without DNA sequence alterations. The “Fascial Memory Reset Hypothesis” proposes that targeted mechanical interventions such as FHR may partially reverse these mechanically maintained states by restoring tissue mobility and modifying stiffness-dependent mechanotransduction. We propose that “stacking fascia” (observed as layered hyperechoic bands on ultrasound) represents the macroscopic structural phenotype of mechano-epigenetic memory formed through sustained mechanical stress. Integrating molecular mechanotransduction pathways, mechano-epigenetic mechanisms, neural sensitization, and vascular factors, we propose that FHR may hypothetically partially normalize pathological fascial states by mechanically restoring tissue mobility and modifying stiffness-dependent signaling. Although direct molecular evidence of the effect of FHR in human fascia remains limited, this hypothesis provides a biologically plausible link between mechanical stress, ultrasound-visible structural alterations, and sustained clinical improvement.

Antidepressants, such as duloxetine, are widely used to treat chronic pain, including neuropathic pain; however, their efficacy is unsatisfactory. In our previous studies, we showed that in a spinal nerve ligation (SNL) rat model, the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system, which involves in the anti-hypersensitivity mechanism of an-tidepressants, decrease its activity over time following peripheral nerve injury. In this study, we hypothesized that the analgesic effects of duloxetine may diminish following the attenuation of the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system. The analgesic effects of duloxetine in SNL model rats at the early (SNL2W) and chronic (SNL6W) phases following spinal nerve ligation were compared. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to the SNL2W or SNL6W groups and used to evaluate the anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine using the von Frey filament test. The anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine at a dose of 10 mg/kg were lower in SNL6W rats than in SNL2W rats. Basal noradrenaline concentrations in rat spinal dorsal horns were higher in the SNL6W group than in the SNL2W group, and there was no difference in the increase in spinal noradrenaline concen-trations between the 2 groups following duloxetine administration. In addition, we found that duloxetine-induced acetylcholine (ACh) release and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) expression in the spinal dorsal horn decreased in SNL6W rats. At a dose of 30 mg/kg, duloxetine showed anti-allodynic effects even in SNL6W rats and induced ACh release in the spinal cord. Furthermore, these anti-allodynic effects were completely inhibited by intrathecal atropine (muscarinic antagonist) administration. Moreover, 5 daily intraperitoneal injections of the TrkB agonist, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (5 mg/kg), not only restored ChAT expression, but also decreased the anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine. These findings suggest that the attenuation of the anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine at the chronic phase of SNL may be due to impaired spinal acetylcholine-mediated analgesia. In addition, the activation of BDNF-TrkB signaling may be beneficial in reversing this impairment.