Nathan Lepora

Dr. Nathan Lepora


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2018 in Soft Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BWBenjamin Ward-Cherrier
Benjamin Ward-Cherrier
NPNicholas Pestell
Nicholas Pestell
LCLuke Cramphorn
Luke Cramphorn
BWBenjamin Winstone
Benjamin Winstone
MGMaria Elena Giannaccini
Maria Elena Giannaccini
NLNathan Lepora
Nathan Lepora
Tactile sensing is an essential component in human–robot interaction and object manipulation. Soft sensors allow for safe interaction and improved gripping performance. Here we present the TacTip family of sensors: a range of soft optical tactile sensors with various morphologies fabricated through dual-material 3D printing. All of these sensors are inspired by the same biomimetic design principle: transducing deformation of the sensing surface via movement of pins analogous to the function of intermediate ridges within the human fingertip. The performance of the TacTip, TacTip-GR2, TacTip-M2, and TacCylinder sensors is here evaluated and shown to attain submillimeter accuracy on a rolling cylinder task, representing greater than 10-fold super-resolved acuity. A version of the TacTip sensor has also been open-sourced, enabling other laboratories to adopt it as a platform for tactile sensing and manipulation research. These sensors are suitable for real-world applications in tactile perception, exploration, and manipulation, and will enable further research and innovation in the field of soft tactile sensing.

3 September 2018 in IEEE Sensors Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WCWei Chen
Wei Chen
HKHeba Khamis
Heba Khamis
IBIngvars Birznieks
Ingvars Birznieks
NLNathan Lepora
Nathan Lepora
SRStephen Redmond
Stephen Redmond
Humans can handle and manipulate objects with ease; however, human dexterity has yet to be matched by artificial systems. Receptors in our fingers and hands provide essential tactile information to the motor control system during dexterous manipulation such that the grip force is scaled to the tangential forces according to the coefficient of friction. Likewise, tactile sensing will become essential for robotic and prosthetic gripping performance as applications move toward unstructured environments. However, most existing research ignores the need to sense the frictional properties of the sensor–object interface, which (along with contact forces and torques) is essential for finding the minimum grip force required to securely grasp an object. Here, we review this problem by surveying the field of tactile sensing from the perspective that sensors should: 1) detect gross slip (to adjust the grip force); 2) detect incipient slip (dependent on the frictional properties of the sensor–object interface and the geometries and mechanics of the sensor and the object) as an indication of grip security; or 3) measure friction on contact with an object and/or following a gross or incipient slip event while manipulating an object. Recommendations are made to help focus future sensor design efforts toward a generalizable and practical solution to sense, and hence control grip security. Specifically, we propose that the sensor mechanics should encourage incipient slip, by allowing parts of the sensor to slip while other parts remain stuck, and that instrumentation should measure displacement and deformation to complement conventional force, pressure, and vibration tactile sensing.

27 July 2021 in IEEE Sensors Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NLNathan Lepora
Nathan Lepora
Reproducing the capabilities of the human sense of touch in machines is an important step in enabling robot manipulation to have the ease of human dexterity. A combination of robotic technologies will be needed, including soft robotics, biomimetics and the high-resolution sensing offered by optical tactile sensors. This combination is considered here as a SoftBOT (Soft Biomimetic Optical Tactile) sensor. This article reviews the BRL TacTip as a prototypical example of such a sensor. Topics include the relation between artificial skin morphology and the transduction principles of human touch, the nature and benefits of tactile shear sensing, 3D printing for fabrication and integration into robot hands, the application of AI to tactile perception and control, and the recent step-change in capabilities due to deep learning. This review consolidates those advances from the past decade to indicate a path for robots to reach human-like dexterity.

7 April 2015 in PLOS Computational Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NLNathan Lepora
Nathan Lepora
Giovanni PezzuloGiovanni Pezzulo
Giovanni Pezzulo
Embodied Choice considers action performance as a proper part of the decision making process rather than merely as a means to report the decision. The central statement of embodied choice is the existence of bidirectional influences between action and decisions. This implies that for a decision expressed by an action, the action dynamics and its constraints (e.g. current trajectory and kinematics) influence the decision making process. Here we use a perceptual decision making task to compare three types of model: a serial decision-then-action model, a parallel decision-and-action model, and an embodied choice model where the action feeds back into the decision making. The embodied model incorporates two key mechanisms that together are lacking in the other models: action preparation and commitment. First, action preparation strategies alleviate delays in enacting a choice but also modify decision termination. Second, action dynamics change the prospects and create a commitment effect to the initially preferred choice. Our results show that these two mechanisms make embodied choice models better suited to combine decision and action appropriately to achieve suitably fast and accurate responses, as usually required in ecologically valid situations. Moreover, embodied choice models with these mechanisms give a better account of trajectory tracking experiments during decision making. In conclusion, the embodied choice framework offers a combined theory of decision and action that gives a clear case that embodied phenomena such as the dynamics of actions can have a causal influence on central cognition. The modern view of how we make perceptual decisions is of a process of accumulating sensory evidence until reaching a threshold level of certainty. However, this evidence accumulation model neglects the contribution of action and motor processes to the choice that is made. Recent novel studies that track the changing dynamics of actions during perceptual decisions are increasingly revealing the contribution of the actions we make to our perceptual choices. Thus, the action dynamics of our bodies causally influences our central cognition, which is a core assumption of embodied theories of mind. This paper presents an explanation of how actions, encompassing behavioral strategies such as preparation and commitment, can bias decision making processes in ways that optimize the ecological choices of animals behaving in natural environments. It thus combines two disconnected research streams, decision-making and action control in a manner consistent with theoretical and psychological arguments for embodied cognition.

9 January 2013 in Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NLNathan Lepora
Nathan Lepora
PVPaul F.M.J. Verschure
Paul F.M.J. Verschure
TPTony J. Prescott
Tony J. Prescott
Biomimetics is a research field that is achieving particular prominence through an explosion of new discoveries in biology and engineering. The field concerns novel technologies developed through the transfer of function from biological systems. To analyze the impact of this field within engineering and related sciences, we compiled an extensive database of publications for study with network-based information analysis techniques. Criteria included publications by year and journal or conference, and subject areas judged by popular and common terms in titles. Our results reveal that this research area has expanded rapidly from less than 100 papers per year in the 1990s to several thousand papers per year in the first decade of this century. Moreover, this research is having impact across a variety of research themes, spanning robotics, computer science and bioengineering. In consequence, biomimetics is becoming a leading paradigm for the development of new technologies that will potentially lead to significant scientific, societal and economic impact in the near future.

4 July 2018 in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JJJasper Wollaston James
Jasper Wollaston James
NPNicholas Pestell
Nicholas Pestell
NLNathan Lepora
Nathan Lepora
Slip detection helps to prevent robotic hands from dropping grasped objects and would thus enable complex object manipulation. Here we present a method of detecting slip with a biomimetic optical tactile sensor-the TacTip-that operates by measuring the positions of internal pins embedded in its compliant skin. We investigate whether local pin movement is a strong signal of slip. Accurate and robust discrimination between static and slipping objects is obtained with a support vector machine (accuracy 99.88%). We then demonstrate performance on a task in which a slipping object must be caught. For fast reaction times, a modified TacTip is made for high-speed data collection. Performance of the slip detection method is then validated under several test conditions, including varying the speed at which slip onset occurs and using novel shaped objects. The proposed methods should apply to tactile sensors that can detect the local velocities of surface movement. The sensor and slip detection methods are also well-suited for integration onto robotic hands for deploying slip control under manipulation.