Uneven settlement of transmission tower foundations can result in catastrophic events, such as tower collapse and line failures, disrupting power transmission operations. To address the challenging repairs caused by uneven foundation settlement of transmission towers, we propose an adjustable foundation bolt (AFB). This paper provides a detailed theoretical analysis of the AFB’s stability and load-bearing capacity, including critical buckling force formulas and maximum normal stress expressions. Finite element simulations confirm the precision of our theoretical formulations. Additionally, we introduce a method using baffles to enhance its load-bearing capacity, analyzing the impact of different numbers of baffles through numerical simulations. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of baffles in enhancing structural load-bearing capacity. The device brings convenience and efficiency to the maintenance of transmission towers.
The permeability characteristics of expansive soil have a significant impact on slope stability. This study investigates the permeability evolution of three expansive soils (B, GW, GB) with distinct swelling potentials (68%, 42%, and 28%) under repeated wet–dry cycles, combining laboratory falling-head tests and in situ four-ring infiltrometer measurements. The results demonstrate that the permeability coefficient increases consistently with cycle number. The high-expansivity soil (B) exhibited the most pronounced change, with permeability increasing from 10−6 cm/s to 10−3 cm/s after five cycles, whereas the low-expansivity soil (GB) remained stable. A significant specimen size effect was observed in initial permeability, which stabilized beyond a critical infiltration area of 1102.7 cm2. However, this size dependence diminished after three cycles due to extensive cracking and structural homogenization. Crack density analysis further confirmed microstructural stabilization at sample diameters between 32 and 38 cm, validating the adopted in situ seepage diameter of 37 cm. Linear regression revealed greater discrepancies between laboratory and in situ permeability values in high-swelling soils. Empirical formulas incorporating wet–dry cycles were developed to accurately predict in situ permeability, providing practical tools for engineering design and risk assessment.
This study primarily investigates the mechanical performance of prestressed anchor foundations. Based on the assumptions of continuity, homogeneity, and isotropy of the anchor foundation and anchoring materials, a simplified elastic analysis model was developed. Using the superposition principle, the working stresses under vertical loads and bending moments were calculated, allowing for the determination of the maximum working stresses within the anchors and the foundation. Additionally, the distribution of bond strength of the prestressed tendons was analyzed, and the concept of effective anchorage length was introduced. The reliability of the model was validated through prototype testing, with the measured free segment strain values showing a high degree of consistency with theoretical calculations, with errors within 6.5%. Empirical data on ultimate bearing capacity and bond characteristics were also obtained. By integrating numerical calculations with experimental results, the performance of the anchoring system under extreme and specialized loading conditions was analyzed. The experimental results indicated that the failure modes of all anchor foundations were characterized by bond failure at the interface between the anchor and the surrounding rock mass. Based on the experimental data, a reasonable anchorage length satisfying design strength requirements was proposed. The findings provide a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for the design and application of prestressed anchor foundations in structures such as wind turbine towers.
To address the high bending stresses and potential structural failure risks caused by differential settlement at expansion joints during bridge widening projects of straight bridges, this paper proposes an “Adaptive Rebound Displacement Compensation Device”. Existing research primarily focuses on analyzing settlement patterns and passive control standards, with limited attention to active dynamic regulation. Notably, the bending stress induced by new pier settlements can reach 3–5 times that of vehicle loads, posing serious safety concerns. Through theoretical derivation, this study clarifies the relationship between superstructure loss of strength and factors such as pier settlement, device stiffness, friction coefficient, and L-shaped baffle angle, and a comprehensive design framework is established accordingly. Combining numerical simulations, laboratory tests, and field measurements from engineering practices, multiple validation approaches are employed. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed device can limit deck subsidence to 10–20% of pier settlement height, and experimental outcomes align closely with theoretical predictions. This device has been successfully implemented in a bridge widening project on a highway section in Jiangxi Province. It should be noted that all data presented in the paper are derived from finite element method (FEM) numerical simulations, and there are currently no on-site measurements of the device’s performance. FEM analysis indicates that the device demonstrates certain feasibility for practical engineering applications. Compared to scenarios without the installation of this device, bridge deck displacements can be reduced by approximately 16.5%. By enabling adaptive rebound through self-adjustment mechanisms for settlement compensation, this device significantly alleviates bending stresses at expansion joints, breaking through traditional passive control limitations. This study provides an innovative approach for actively controlling settlement differences in the widening of straight bridges, offering significant implications both at the theoretical and practical levels.