Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of the tongue is the most common type of oral cavity cancer, and tumor depth of invasion (DOI) is an important prognostic factor. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of intraoral ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing DOI in patients with OSCC. Histopathological measurement of DOI was used as a reference standard. We conducted a prospective study including patients planned for surgical treatment of OSCC in the tongue. The DOI was measured in an outpatient setting by intraoral ultrasound and MRI, and was compared to the histopathological DOI measurements. Bland–Altman analysis compared the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for ultrasound and MRI, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for significance. The correlation was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. We included 30 patients: 26 with T1 or T2 tumors, and 4 with T3 tumors. The mean difference from histopathology DOI was significantly lower for ultrasound compared to MRI (0.95 mm [95% LOA −4.15 mm to 6.06 mm] vs. 1.90 mm [95% LOA −9.02 mm and 12.81 mm], p = 0.023). Ultrasound also led to significantly more correct T-stage classifications in 86.7% (26) of patients compared to 56.7% (17) for MRI, p = 0.015. The Pearson correlation between MRI and histopathology was 0.57 (p < 0.001) and the correlation between ultrasound and histopathology was 0.86 (p < 0.001). This prospective study found that intraoral ultrasound is more accurate than MRI in assessing DOI and for the T-staging of oral tongue cancers. Clinical practice and guidelines should implement intraoral ultrasound accordingly.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the tongue is the most prevalent form of oral cavity cancer, with surgical intervention as the preferred method of treatment. Achieving negative or free resection margins of at least 5 mm is associated with improved local control and prolonged survival. Nonetheless, margins that are close (1–5 mm) or positive (less than 1 mm) are often observed in practice, especially for the deep margins. Ultrasound is a promising tool for assessing the depth of invasion, providing non-invasive, real-time imaging for accurate evaluation. We conducted a clinical trial using a novel portable 3D ultrasound imaging technique to assess ex vivo surgical margin assessment in the operating room. During the operation, resected surgical specimens underwent 3D ultrasound scanning. Four head and neck surgeons measured the surgical margins (deep, medial, and lateral) and tumor area on the 3D ultrasound volume. These results were then compared with the histopathology findings evaluated by two head and neck pathologists. Six patients diagnosed with tongue SCC (three T1 stage and three T2 stage) were enrolled for a consecutive cohort. The margin status was correctly categorized as free by 3D ultrasound in five cases, and one case with a “free” margin status was incorrectly categorized by 3D ultrasound as a “close” margin. The Pearson correlation between ultrasound and histopathology was 0.7 (p < 0.001), 0.6 (p < 0.001), and 0.3 (p < 0.05) for deep, medial, and lateral margin measurements, respectively. Bland–Altman analysis compared the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for deep margin measurement by 3D ultrasound and histopathology, with a mean difference of 0.7 mm (SD 1.15 mm). This clinical trial found that 3D ultrasound is accurate in deep margin measurements. The implementation of intraoperative 3D ultrasound imaging of surgical specimens may improve the number of free margins after tongue cancer treatment.

Surgery is the primary treatment for tongue cancer. The goal is a complete resection of the tumor with an adequate margin of healthy tissue around the tumor.Inadequate margins lead to a high risk of local cancer recurrence and the need for adjuvant therapies. Ex vivo imaging of the resected surgical specimen has been suggested for margin assessment and improved surgical results. Therefore, we have developed a novel three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging technique to improve the assessment of resection margins during surgery. In this research protocol, we describe a study comparing the accuracy of 3D ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical examination of the surgical specimen to assess the resection margins during cancer surgery. Tumor segmentation and margin measurement will be performed using 3D ultrasound and MRI of the ex vivo specimen. We will determine the accuracy of each method by comparing the margin measurements and the proportion of correctly classified margins (positive, close, and free) obtained by each technique with respect to the gold standard histopathology.

This study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, diagnostic, clinical trial describes the integration of transoral and transcervical ultrasonography (US) in the initial clinical work-up of patients referred to tertiary head and neck cancer centers with suspected oropharyngeal cancer. The study evaluates the blinded detection rate of oropharyngeal tumors and their US-estimated size and T-stage before histopathology and cross-sectional imaging are available. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans will be prospectively rated while blinded to T-site histopathology and US. The primary outcome measures of diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy, will be reported for both US and MRI. A sub-analysis of prospectively rated 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) scans in patients with clinically suspected unknown primary tumors will also be compared to US and MRI. Secondary outcome measures, including a comparison of tumor size estimation between US, MRI, and CT, will also be reported. This prospective multicenter study will provide clinically impactful information regarding the use of transoral and transcervical US for the diagnostic work-up of oropharyngeal cancer.

Objective: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is essential for evaluating thyroid nodules but often yields inadequate samples, leading to repeated procedures, increased discomfort, and higher costs. Previous non-randomized studies found promising results of spinal needles to improve diagnostic adequacy. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to validate these findings. Methods: Between July 1^st, 2021, and April 13^th, 2023, patients with suspicious thyroid nodules were randomized to receive FNAB with either a 25G spinal needle or conventional needle. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate diagnostic cytology. Secondary outcomes included procedure-related pain, sensitivity and specificity of FNAB, and adverse events. Results: A total of 359 patients (75.6% female), with a mean age of 59.7 years (range 23−94) were randomized. The rate of adequate diagnostic FNAB was 86.2% (156/181) for the spinal group compared to 84.8% (151/178) for the control group (OR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.95–1.08). The mean pain scale score was 4.0 (SD = 1.8) in the spinal group and 3.9 (SD = 2.0) in the control group (p = 0.40). No complications were observed in either group. We found a significantly better cytological adequacy rate of FNABs performed by physicians with more than four years of experience in the procedure (OR=1.07; 95% CI, 1.01–1.14). Conclusions: No significant improvement was found using spinal needles with a stylet compared to conventional needles. Given the significantly higher cost of spinal needles and comparable diagnostic outcomes, their routine use for thyroid FNAB is not recommended.