Nadia  Senechal

Prof. Dr. Nadia Senechal

University of Bordeaux, UMR CNRS EPOC 5805, OASU, Pessac, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2015 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBruno Castelle
Bruno Castelle
VMVincent Marieu
Vincent Marieu
SBStéphane Bujan
Stéphane Bujan
Kristen SplinterKristen Splinter
Kristen Splinter
ARArhur Robinet
Arhur Robinet
SFSophie Ferreira
Sophie Ferreira

30 July 2011 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nadia  SenechalNadia Senechal
Nadia Senechal
GCGiovanni Coco
Giovanni Coco
KBKarin R. Bryan
Karin R. Bryan
RHRob A. Holman
Rob A. Holman

1 November 2007 in Marine Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBruno Castelle
Bruno Castelle
PBPhilippe Bonneton
Philippe Bonneton
HDHélène Dupuis
Hélène Dupuis
Nadia  SenechalNadia Senechal
Nadia Senechal

7 February 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJennifer Montaño
Jennifer Montaño
GCGiovanni Coco
Giovanni Coco
JAJose A. A. Antolínez
Jose A. A. Antolínez
TBTomas Beuzen
Tomas Beuzen
KBKarin R. Bryan
Karin R. Bryan
KVKilian Vos
Kilian Vos
Beaches around the world continuously adjust to daily and seasonal changes in wave and tide conditions, which are themselves changing over longer time-scales. Different approaches to predict multi-year shoreline evolution have been implemented; however, robust and reliable predictions of shoreline evolution are still problematic even in short-term scenarios (shorter than decadal). Here we show results of a modelling competition, where 19 numerical models (a mix of established shoreline models and machine learning techniques) were tested using data collected for Tairua beach, New Zealand with 18 years of daily averaged alongshore shoreline position and beach rotation (orientation) data obtained from a camera system. In general, traditional shoreline models and machine learning techniques were able to reproduce shoreline changes during the calibration period (1999–2014) for normal conditions but some of the model struggled to predict extreme and fast oscillations. During the forecast period (unseen data, 2014–2017), both approaches showed a decrease in models’ capability to predict the shoreline position. This was more evident for some of the machine learning algorithms. A model ensemble performed better than individual models and enables assessment of uncertainties in model architecture. Research-coordinated approaches (e.g., modelling competitions) can fuel advances in predictive capabilities and provide a forum for the discussion about the advantages/disadvantages of available models.

1 January 2010 in Marine Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJamie MacMahan
Jamie MacMahan
JBJeff Brown
Jeff Brown
JBJenna Brown
Jenna Brown
ETEd Thornton
Ed Thornton
Ad ReniersAd Reniers
Ad Reniers
Nadia  SenechalNadia Senechal
Nadia Senechal

1 January 2014 in Marine Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBruno Castelle
Bruno Castelle
VMVincent Marieu
Vincent Marieu
SBStéphane Bujan
Stéphane Bujan
SFSophie Ferreira
Sophie Ferreira
JPJean-Paul Parisot
Jean-Paul Parisot
TCThomas Chouzenoux
Thomas Chouzenoux