Aldo R. Boccaccini

Dr. Aldo R. Boccaccini

Institute of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 July 2010 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLutz-Christian Gerhardt
Lutz-Christian Gerhardt
Aldo R. BoccacciniAldo R. Boccaccini
Aldo R. Boccaccini
Traditionally, bioactive glasses have been used to fill and restore bone defects. More recently, this category of biomaterials has become an emerging research field for bone tissue engineering applications. Here, we review and discuss current knowledge on porous bone tissue engineering scaffolds on the basis of melt-derived bioactive silicate glass compositions and relevant composite structures. Starting with an excerpt on the history of bioactive glasses, as well as on fundamental requirements for bone tissue engineering scaffolds, a detailed overview on recent developments of bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds will be given, including a summary of common fabrication methods and a discussion on the microstructural-mechanical properties of scaffolds in relation to human bone (structure-property and structure-function relationship). In addition, ion release effects of bioactive glasses concerning osteogenic and angiogenic responses are addressed. Finally, areas of future research are highlighted in this review.

26 May 2010 in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aldo R. BoccacciniAldo R. Boccaccini
Aldo R. Boccaccini
SKS. Keim
S. Keim
RMR. Ma
R. Ma
YLY. Li
Y. Li
IZI. Zhitomirsky
I. Zhitomirsky
Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) is attracting increasing attention as an effective technique for the processing of biomaterials, specifically bioactive coatings and biomedical nanostructures. The well-known advantages of EPD for the production of a wide range of microstructures and nanostructures as well as unique and complex material combinations are being exploited, starting from well-dispersed suspensions of biomaterials in particulate form (microsized and nanoscale particles, nanotubes, nanoplatelets). EPD of biological entities such as enzymes, bacteria and cells is also being investigated. The review presents a comprehensive summary and discussion of relevant recent work on EPD describing the specific application of the technique in the processing of several biomaterials, focusing on (i) conventional bioactive (inorganic) coatings, e.g. hydroxyapatite or bioactive glass coatings on orthopaedic implants, and (ii) biomedical nanostructures, including biopolymer–ceramic nanocomposites, carbon nanotube coatings, tissue engineering scaffolds, deposition of proteins and other biological entities for sensors and advanced functional coatings. It is the intention to inform the reader on how EPD has become an important tool in advanced biomaterials processing, as a convenient alternative to conventional methods, and to present the potential of the technique to manipulate and control the deposition of a range of nanomaterials of interest in the biomedical and biotechnology fields.

1 October 2017 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAiah El-Rashidy
Aiah El-Rashidy
JRJudith A. Roether
Judith A. Roether
LHLeila Harhaus
Leila Harhaus
UKUlrich Kneser
Ulrich Kneser
Aldo R. BoccacciniAldo R. Boccaccini
Aldo R. Boccaccini

1 April 2020 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Shahin HomaeigoharShahin Homaeigohar
Shahin Homaeigohar
Aldo R. BoccacciniAldo R. Boccaccini
Aldo R. Boccaccini
Globally, chronic wounds impose a notable burden to patients and healthcare systems. Such skin wounds are readily subjected to bacteria that provoke inflammation and hence challenge the healing process. Furthermore, bacteria induce infection impeding re-epithelialization and collagen synthesis. With an estimated global market of $20.4 billion by 2021, appropriate wound dressing materials e.g. those composed of biopolymers originating from nature, are capable of alleviating the infection incidence and of accelerating the healing process. Particularly, biopolymeric nanofibrous dressings are biocompatible and mostly biodegradable and biomimic the extracellular matrix structure. Such nanofibrous dressings provide a high surface area and the ability to deliver antibiotics and antibacterial agents locally into the wound milieu to control infection. In this regard, with the dangerous evolution of antibiotic resistant bacteria, antibiotic delivery systems are being gradually replaced with antibacterial biohybrid nanofibrous wound dressings. This emerging class of wound dressings comprises biopolymeric nanofibers containing antibacterial nanoparticles, nature-derived compounds and biofunctional agents. Here, the most recent (since 2015) developments of antibacterial biopolymeric nanofibrous wound dressings, particularly those made of biohybrids, are reviewed and their antibacterial efficiency is evaluated based on a comprehensive literature analysis. Lastly, the prospects and challenges are discussed to draw a roadmap for further progresses and to open up future research avenues in this area. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: With a global market of $20.4 billion by 2021, skin wound dressings are a crucial segment of the wound care industry. As an advanced class of bioactive wound dressing materials, natural polymeric nanofibers loaded with antibacterial agents, e.g. antimicrobial nanoparticles/ions, nature-derived compounds and biofunctional agents, have shown a remarkable potential for replacement of their classic counterparts. Also, given the expanding concern regarding antibiotic resistant bacteria, such biohybrid nanofibrous wound dressings can outperform classical drug delivery systems. Here, an updated overview of the most recent (since 2015) developments of antibacterial biopolymeric nanofibrous wound dressings is presented. In this review, while discussing about the antibacterial efficiency of such systems, the prospects and challenges are highlighted to draw a roadmap for further progresses in this area.

1 February 2015 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VMValentina Miguez-Pacheco
Valentina Miguez-Pacheco
LHLarry L. Hench
Larry L. Hench
Aldo R. BoccacciniAldo R. Boccaccini
Aldo R. Boccaccini

11 December 2013 in Journal of Materials Chemistry B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBapi Sarker
Bapi Sarker
Dimitrios PapageorgiouDimitrios Papageorgiou
Dimitrios Papageorgiou
RSRaquel Silva
Raquel Silva
TZTobias Zehnder
Tobias Zehnder
FGFarhana Gul-E-Noor
Farhana Gul-E-Noor
Aldo R. BoccacciniAldo R. Boccaccini
Aldo R. Boccaccini
Microencapsulation of cells by using biodegradable hydrogels offers numerous attractive features for a variety of biomedical applications including tissue engineering. This study highlights the fabrication of microcapsules from an alginate–gelatin crosslinked hydrogel (ADA–GEL) and presents the evaluation of the physico-chemical properties of the new microcapsules which are relevant for designing suitable microcapsules for tissue engineering. Alginate di-aldehyde (ADA) was synthesized by periodate oxidation of alginate which facilitates crosslinking with gelatin through Schiff's base formation between the free amino groups of gelatin and the available aldehyde groups of ADA. Formation of Schiff's base in ADA–GEL and aldehyde groups in ADA was confirmed by FTIR and NMR spectroscopy, respectively. Thermal degradation behavior of films and microcapsules fabricated from alginate, ADA and ADA–GEL was dependent on the hydrogel composition. The gelation time of ADA–GEL was found to decrease with increasing gelatin content. The swelling ratio of ADA–GEL microcapsules of all compositions was significantly decreased, whereas the degradability was found to increase with the increase of gelatin ratio. The surface morphology of the ADA–GEL microcapsules was totally different from that of alginate and ADA microcapsules, observed by SEM. Two different buffer solutions (with and without calcium salt) have an influence on the stability of microcapsules which had a significant effect on the gelatin release profile of ADA–GEL microcapsules in these two buffer solutions.