The public sector includes social security institutions and institutions that provide services to the population without social security. The private sector includes private insurance companies and service providers working in private offices, clinics, and hospitals. Longer lifespans and exposure to risks associated with unhealthy lifestyles have transformed the leading causes of disease and death. Chronic non-communicable diseases and injuries are increasingly prevalent in the health profile. Health system coverage improved over the last two decades, from less than 50 million people with health insurance in 2000 to over 100 million in 2016. Healthcare in Mexico is financed with public and private resources. Public resources finance partially the institutions that serve the population with contributory health insurance and fully those that serve the population without this labor benefit. Health spending represents 5.5% of gross domestic product. There are 34 756 healthcare units in Mexico. The ratio of doctors per thousand inhabitants is 2.5. Healthcare regulation activities include accreditation of health sciences schools and faculties, licensing and certification of physicians and nurses, and certification of healthcare units. The Comisión Federal de Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios is responsible for health regulation.

Essential indicators of health system performance for breast cancer are lacking in Mexico. We estimated survival and clinical stage distribution for women without social insurance who were treated under a health financing scheme that covered 60% of the Mexican population. We conducted a retrospective cohort study cross-linking reimbursement claims for 56,847 women treated for breast cancer between 2007 and 2016 to a mortality registry. We estimated overall- and clinical stage-specific survival and breast cancer survival according to patient age, state of residence, marginalization, type of treatment facility, and patient volume of the treatment facility. We also explored the distribution of clinical stage according to age, year of treatment initiation, and state where the woman was treated. We used log-rank tests and estimated 95% CIs to compare differences between patient groups. Median age was 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 45, 61) (Sixty five percent patients (36,731/56,847) had advanced disease at treatment initiation. Five-year overall survival was 72.2% (95% CI 71.7, 72.6). For early disease (excluding stage 0), 5-year overall survival was 89.0% (95% CI 88.4, 89.5), for locally advanced disease 69.9% (95% CI 69.0, 70.2) and for metastatic 36.9% (95% CI 35.4, 38.4). Clinical stage at treatment initiation and breast cancer survival remained unchanged in the period analyzed. Clinical stage and survival differed across age groups, state of residence, and type of facility where women received treatment. In the absence of population-based cancer registries, medical claims data may be efficiently leveraged to estimate essential cancer-related performance indicators. The authors received no financial support for this research.

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most frequent cancer types in women worldwide. About 7% is diagnosed in young women (YBC) less than 40 years old. In Mexico, however, YBC reaches 15% suggesting a higher genetic susceptibility. There have been some reports of germline variants in YBC across the world. However, there is only one report from a Mexican population, which is not restricted by age and limited to a panel of 143 genes resulting in 15% of patients carrying putatively pathogenic variants. Nevertheless, expanding the analysis to whole exome involves using more complex tools to determine which genes and variants could be pathogenic. We used germline whole exome sequencing combined with the PeCanPie tool to analyze exome variants in 115 YBC patients. Our results showed that we were able to identify 49 high likely pathogenic variants involving 40 genes on 34% of patients. We noted many genes already reported in BC and YBC worldwide, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, and POLQ, but also others not commonly reported in YBC in Latin America, such as CLTCL1, DDX3X, ERCC6, FANCE, and NFKBIE. We show further supporting and controversial evidence for some of these genes. We conclude that exome sequencing combined with robust annotation tools and further analysis, can identify more genes and more patients affected by germline mutations in cancer.

The growing cancer burden particularly among less developed countries requires local data to plan and evaluate cancer control measures. This article describes the development of a population-based cancer registry network (PBCRN) in Mexico that took place between 2017 and 2020 and present related data. The PBCRN, led by the National Cancer Institute (Incan), included nine registries representing 11.3% of the Mexican population. Definitions, coding, and operative processes were based on international standards. All cities were visited to set up local structure; personnel were hired by Incan and trained in basic cancer registration in Merida. A specific software was developed. Regular virtual meetings took place for data verification and quality control. Data collection included institutions of the public and private health system. Personnel included 34 registrars, nine local leaders, and 12 staff members at the Incan. A total of 13 517 cases were recorded between 2017-2020, 64% percent of them were among females. Breast cancer was the more frequent malignancy (23.3%), followed by digestive organs with (18.4%) and female genital cancers (13.5%). Childhood (0-14 years) and adolescents cancer represented 4.4% of the total new cancer cases. The network was suspended in 2020. The present effort lacked sustainability and data were only partial. However, the experience provides valuable insights to be considered for the renewed cancer registration efforts that are currently ongoing in Mexico.

(1) Background: Somatic mutations may be connected to the exposome, potentially playing a role in breast cancer’s development and clinical outcomes. There needs to be information regarding Latin American women specifically, as they are underrepresented in clinical trials and have limited access to somatic analysis in their countries. This study aims to systematically investigate somatic mutations in breast cancer patients from Latin America to gain a better understanding of tumor biology in the region. (2) Methods: We realize a systematic review of studies on breast cancer in 21 Latin American countries using various databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, RedAlyc, Dianlet, and Biblioteca Virtual en Salud. Of 392 articles that fit the criteria, 10 studies have clinical data which can be used to create a database containing clinical and genetic information. We compared mutation frequencies across different breast cancer subtypes using statistical analyses and meta-analyses of proportions. Furthermore, we identified overexpressed biological processes and canonical pathways through functional enrichment analysis. (3) Results: 342 mutations were found in six Latin American countries, with the TP53 and PIK3CA genes being the most studied mutations. The most common PIK3CA mutation was H1047R. Functional analysis provided insights into tumor biology and potential therapies. (4) Conclusion: evaluating specific somatic mutations in the Latin American population is crucial for understanding tumor biology and determining appropriate treatment options. Combining targeted therapies may improve clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Moreover, implementing healthy lifestyle strategies in Latin America could enhance therapy effectiveness and clinical outcomes.