Globally, acute appendicitis has an estimated lifetime risk of 7–8%. However, there are numerous controversies surrounding the management of acute appendicitis, and the best treatment approach depends on patient characteristics. Non-operative management (NOM), which involves the utilization of antibiotics and aggressive intravenous hydration, and surgical appendectomy are valid treatment options for healthy adults. NOM is also ideal for poor surgical candidates. Another important consideration is the timing of surgery, i.e., the role of interval appendectomy (IA) and the possibility of delaying surgery for a few hours on index admission. IA refers to surgical removal of the appendix 8–12 weeks after the initial diagnosis of appendicitis. It is ideal in patients with a contained appendiceal perforation on initial presentation, wherein an initial nonoperative approach is preferred. Furthermore, IA can help distinguish malignant and non-malignant causes of acute appendicitis, while reducing the risk of recurrence. On the contrary, a decision to delay appendectomy for a few hours on index admission should be made based on the patients’ baseline health status and severity of appendicitis. Post-operatively, surgical drain placement may help reduce postoperative complications; however, it carries an increased risk of drain occlusion, fistula formation, and paralytic ileus. Furthermore, one of the most critical aspects of appendectomy is the closure of the appendiceal stump, which can be achieved with the help of endoclips, sutures, staples, and endoloops. In this review, we discuss different aspects of management of acute appendicitis, current controversies in management, and the potential role of endoscopic appendectomy as a future treatment option.

Background: Chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) significantly affects patients undergoing anthracycline (AC) therapy, with a prevalence ranging from 2% to 20%. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) are prognostic parameters for CTRCD detection. Our study aimed to investigate the role of emerging parameters such as left atrial strain (LAS). Methods: We searched multiple databases for studies comparing LAS changes post-AC versus pre-AC therapy in patients with cancer. Primary outcomes included left atrial reservoir strain (LASr), left atrial conduit strain (LAScd), and left atrial contractile strain (LASct). RevMan (v5.4) was used to pool the standardized mean difference (SMD) under a random effects model, with p < 0.05 as the threshold for statistical significance. Results: In an analysis of 297 patients across five studies, AC therapy significantly lowered LASr (SMD = −0.34, 95% CI:−0.55, −0.14, I² = 0%, p = 0.0009) and LAScd (SMD = −0.41, 95% CI: −0.59, −0.23, I² = 0%, p < 0.00001) levels. Conversely, LASct demonstrated no significant change (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI: −0.21, 0.23, I² = 9%, p = 0.95). AC therapy also significantly reduced LV GLS (SMD = −0.31, 95% CI: −0.51, −0.11, I² = 0%, p = 0.003). While not statistically significant, LVEF decreased (SMD = −0.20, 95% CI: −0.42, 0.03, I² = 0%, p = 0.09), and left atrial volume index trended higher (SMD = 0.07, 95% CI: −0.14, 0.27, I² = 0%, p = 0.52) after AC therapy. Conclusions: AC treatment led to reduced LAS and LV GLS values, indicating its potential as an early CTRCD indicator. Larger trials are required to fully explore their clinical significance.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are a significant vascular pathology in older adults, often asymptomatic but with high mortality upon rupture. Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging and surgical interventions, AAAs remain a public health concern. This research letter analyzed CDC WONDER data on AAA-related deaths (ICD-10 I71.3 and I71.4) among US adults aged 65+ from 1999 to 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and annual percent change (APC) were calculated by year, gender, age group, race/ethnicity, geography, and urbanization status. Between 1999 and 2020, there were 180,037 reported deaths in older adults due to AAA. The overall AAMR decreased from 32.6 to 13.2 per 100,000, with a significant decline from 2014 to 2020 (APC: −1.66; 95% CI: −2.48 to −0.48). Older men had a significantly higher AAMR than older women (31.2 vs. 12). Among racial and ethnic groups, Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had the highest AAMR at 21.7, followed by NH American Indian or Alaska Native (14.5), NH Black (12.6), NH Asian or Pacific Islander (10.1), and Hispanic populations (8.4). Additionally, non-metropolitan areas exhibited higher AAMRs compared to metropolitan areas (23.9 vs. 18.7). While mortality rates have declined, disparities remain, with higher rates among older men, NH Whites, and non-metropolitan residents, highlighting the need for targeted and equitable interventions. Export

Background: Recent guidelines suggest that antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the standard of care in the absence of long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) indications in patients post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The superiority of one method over the other remains controversial. Materials and methods: Several databases, including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE, were electronically searched. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality (ACM) rate. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/TIA, haemorrhagic stroke, bleeding events, systemic embolism, and valve thrombosis in post-TAVR patients receiving APT and oral anticoagulants (OACs). Forest plots were generated using Review Manager version 5.4, with a p value less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: Twelve studies were selected. No significant differences were observed in APT and OAC group for ACM [risk ratio (RR): 0.67; 95% CI:0.45–1.01; P=0.05], cardiovascular death [RR:0.91; 95% CI:0.73–1.14; P=0.42], MI [RR:1.69; 95% CI:0.43–6.72; P=0.46], Stroke/TIA [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.58–1.06; P=0.12], ischaemic stroke [RR:0.83; 95% CI:0.50–1.37; P=0.47], haemorrhagic stroke [RR:1.08; 95% CI: 0.23–5.15; P=0.92], major bleeding [RR:0.79; 95% CI:0.51–1.21; P=0.28], minor bleeding [RR:1.09; 95% CI: 0.80–1.47; P=0.58], life-threatening bleeding [RR:0.85; 95% CI:0.55–1.30; P=0.45], any bleeding [RR:0.98; 95% CI:0.83–1.15; P=0.78], and systemic embolism [RR:0.87; 95% CI:0.44–1.70; P=0.68]. The risk of valve thrombosis was higher in patients receiving APT than in those receiving OAC [RR:2.61; 95% CI:1.56–4.36; P =0.0002]. Conclusions: Although the risk of valve thrombosis increased in patients receiving APT, the risk of other endpoints was comparable between the two groups.

Background: Despite resuscitative efforts, cardiac arrest (CA) continues to result in high mortality and poor prognosis. However, a gap remains in understanding the comparative outcomes of efforts in emergency departments (ED) over recent years. This study evaluated patients with CA during ED visits, with a particular focus on outcomes of mortality and transition of care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database. The study population included patients aged 18 years or older who visited the ED between January 2016 and December 2020. Statistical analysis of patients and hospital characteristics included chi-squared tests for independence and multivariable logistic regression models to report the associations of factors with mortality in the ED and disposition from the ED. The primary outcome measured was mortality in the ED, and the secondary outcome included transition of care. Results: A total of 699,822,424 ED visits occurred between 2016 and 2020, with 1,414,060 (0.20%) CAs. The survival rate from CA ranged from 24.6% to 28.1%. In 2020, the rate of ED CA increased to 0.27%, with an inpatient mortality rate of 58.8%. There was no significant difference in mortality between sexes (p = 0.690). There was a trend for higher mortality in the ED among patients who were self-paid. Notably, the odds of transfer from the ED to other hospitals were significantly lower in minority groups. Conclusions: Our results showed significant disparities in ED mortality and patient disposition following cardiac arrest, highlighting the need for equitable healthcare resources and policies.

Pancreatic cancer is a rare but lethal cancer due to its biologically aggressive nature, advanced stage at the time of diagnosis, and poor response to oncologic therapies. The risk of pancreatic cancer is significantly higher to 5% in certain high-risk individuals with inherited genetic susceptibility. Screening for pancreatic cancer in these individuals from high-risk groups can help with the early detection of pancreatic cancer as well as the detection of precursor lesions leading to early surgical resection and improved overall outcomes. The advancements in radiological imaging as well as advanced endoscopic procedures has made a significant impact on the early diagnosis, surveillance, and staging of pancreatic cancer. There is also a significant advancement in the development of biomarkers for the early detection of pancreatic cancer, which has also led to the development of liquid biopsy, allowing for microRNA detection in serum and circulating tumor cells. Various societies and organizations have provided guidelines for pancreatic cancer screening and surveillance in high-risk individuals. In this review, we aim to discuss the hereditary risk factors for developing pancreatic cancer, summarize the screening recommendations by different societies, and discuss the development of novel biomarkers and areas for future research in pancreatic cancer screening for high-risk individuals.