Adrian Steiner

Prof. Dr. Adrian Steiner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 June 2015 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMaher Alsaaod
Maher Alsaaod
ASAllan L. Schaefer
Allan L. Schaefer
Wolfgang BuescherWolfgang Buescher
Wolfgang Buescher
ASAdrian Steiner
Adrian Steiner
The use of infrared thermography for the identification of lameness in cattle has increased in recent years largely because of its non-invasive properties, ease of automation and continued cost reductions. Thermography can be used to identify and determine thermal abnormalities in animals by characterizing an increase or decrease in the surface temperature of their skin. The variation in superficial thermal patterns resulting from changes in blood flow in particular can be used to detect inflammation or injury associated with conditions such as foot lesions. Thermography has been used not only as a diagnostic tool, but also to evaluate routine farm management. Since 2000, 14 peer reviewed papers which discuss the assessment of thermography to identify and manage lameness in cattle have been published. There was a large difference in thermography performance in these reported studies. However, thermography was demonstrated to have utility for the detection of contralateral temperature difference and maximum foot temperature on areas of interest. Also apparent in these publications was that a controlled environment is an important issue that should be considered before image scanning.

22 February 2015 in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMarlis Aebi
Marlis Aebi
BBBart Hp van Den Borne
Bart Hp van Den Borne
ARAndreas Raemy
Andreas Raemy
ASAdrian Steiner
Adrian Steiner
PPPaola Pilo
Paola Pilo
MBMichèle Bodmer
Michèle Bodmer
Mycoplasma bovis causes mastitis in dairy cows and is associated with pneumonia and polyarthritis in cattle. The present investigation included a retrospective case–control study to identify potential herd-level risk factors for M. bovis associated disease, and a prospective cohort study to evaluate the course of clinical disease in M. bovis infected dairy cattle herds in Switzerland. Eighteen herds with confirmed M. bovis cases were visited twice within an average interval of 75 d. One control herd with no history of clinical mycoplasmosis, matched for herd size, was randomly selected within a 10 km range for each case herd. Animal health data, production data, information on milking and feeding-management, housing and presence of potential stress- factors were collected. Composite quarter milk samples were aseptically collected from all lactating cows and 5% of all animals within each herd were sampled by nasal swabs. Organ samples of culled diseased cows were collected when logistically possible. All samples were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In case herds, incidence risk of pneumonia, arthritis and clinical mastitis prior to the first visit and incidence rates of clinical mastitis and clinical pneumonia between the two visits was estimated. Logistic regression was used to identify potential herd-level risk factors for M. bovis infection. In case herds, incidence risk of M. bovis mastitis prior to the first visit ranged from 2 to 15%, whereas 2 to 35% of the cows suffered from clinical pneumonia within the 12 months prior to the first herd visit. The incidence rates of mycoplasmal mastitis and clinical pneumonia between the two herd visits were low in case herds (0–0.1 per animal year at risk and 0.1-0.6 per animal year at risk, respectively). In the retrospective-case-control study high mean milk production, appropriate stimulation until milk-let-down, fore-stripping, animal movements (cattle shows and trade), presence of stress-factors, and use of a specific brand of milking equipment, were identified as potential herd-level risk factors. The prospective cohort study revealed a decreased incidence of clinical disease within three months and prolonged colonization of the nasal cavity by M. bovis in young stock.

1 May 2021 in The Veterinary Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PZPatrik Zanolari
Patrik Zanolari
SDSalome Dürr
Salome Dürr
Jörg JoresJörg Jores
Jörg Jores
ASAdrian Steiner
Adrian Steiner
PKPeter Kuhnert
Peter Kuhnert
Footrot is a contagious foot disease mainly affecting sheep. It is caused by the Gram-negative anaerobic bacterium Dichelobacter nodosus. Warm, wet environmental conditions favour development of footrot, and under perfect conditions, it takes just 2-3 weeks from infection to manifestation of clinical signs. Affected sheep show lameness of various degrees and often graze while resting on their carpi. Local clinical signs vary in severity and extent from interdigital inflammation (benign footrot) to underrunning of the complete horn shoe in advanced stages of virulent footrot. Laboratory diagnosis ideally involves collection of four-foot interdigital swab samples followed by competitive real time PCR, allowing for detection of the presence of D. nodosus and differentiation between benign and virulent strains. Laboratory-based diagnostics at the flock level based on risk-based sampling and pooling of interdigital swab samples are recommended. The list of treatment options of individual sheep includes careful removal of the loose undermined horn, local or systemic administration of antimicrobials, systemic administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) and disinfectant footbathing. Strategies for control at the flock level are manifold and depend on the environmental conditions and the procedures traditionally implemented by the respective country. Generally, measures consist of treatment/culling of infected sheep, vaccination and prevention of reinfection of disease-free flocks. Gaining deeper insight into the beneficial effects of NSAIDs, screening for eco-friendly footbath solutions, developing better vaccines, including the development of a robust, reproducible infection model and elucidation of protective immune responses, as well as the elaboration of effective awareness training programs for sheep farmers, are relevant research gaps.

1 April 2016 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KNK. Nechanitzky
K. Nechanitzky
ASA. Starke
A. Starke
BVB. Vidondo
B. Vidondo
HMH. Müller
H. Müller
MRM. Reckardt
M. Reckardt
ASAdrian Steiner
Adrian Steiner
Detecting lame cows is important in improving animal welfare. Automated tools are potentially useful to enable identification and monitoring of lame cows. The goals of this study were to evaluate the suitability of various physiological and behavioral parameters to automatically detect lameness in dairy cows housed in a cubicle barn. Lame cows suffering from a claw horn lesion (sole ulcer or white line disease) of one claw of the same hind limb (n=32; group L) and 10 nonlame healthy cows (group C) were included in this study. Lying and standing behavior at night by tridimensional accelerometers, weight distribution between hind limbs by the 4-scale weighing platform, feeding behavior at night by the nose band sensor, and heart activity by the Polar device (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) were assessed. Either the entire data set or parts of the data collected over a 48-h period were used for statistical analysis, depending upon the parameter in question. The standing time at night over 12 h and the limb weight ratio (LWR) were significantly higher in group C as compared with group L, whereas the lying time at night over 12 h, the mean limb difference (△weight), and the standard deviation (SD) of the weight applied on the limb taking less weight were significantly lower in group C as compared with group L. No significant difference was noted between the groups for the parameters of heart activity and feeding behavior at night. The locomotion score of cows in group L was positively correlated with the lying time and △weight, whereas it was negatively correlated with LWR and SD. The highest sensitivity (0.97) for lameness detection was found for the parameter SD [specificity of 0.80 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84]. The highest specificity (0.90) for lameness detection was present for Δweight (sensitivity=0.78; AUC=0.88) and LWR (sensitivity=0.81; AUC=0.87). The model considering the data of SD together with lying time at night was the best predictor of cows being lame, accounting for 40% of the variation in the likelihood of a cow being lame (sensitivity=0.94; specificity=0.80; AUC=0.86). In conclusion, the data derived from the 4-scale-weighing platform, either alone or combined with the lying time at night over 12 h, represent the most valuable parameters for automated identification of lame cows suffering from a claw horn lesion of one individual hind limb.

1 November 2015 in Small Ruminant Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ILIwan Locher
Iwan Locher
DGDeborah Greber
Deborah Greber
KHKerstin Holdener
Kerstin Holdener
RLRita Lüchinger
Rita Lüchinger
CHChristina Haerdi-Landerer
Christina Haerdi-Landerer
ASAdrian Steiner
Adrian Steiner
Footrot is a widespread problem in Swiss sheep farming. The objectives of this study were to determine whether flocks which were clinically free from footrot carry virulent strains of Dichelobacter nodosus, and to describe the infection dynamics for flocks and individual sheep. To this purpose, a new PCR-diagnostic tool was used, which is able to distinguish benign from virulent D. nodosus. Nine farms were examined three times at intervals of 6 months. Cotton swabs were used to collect samples from the interdigital skin to analyze for the presence of virulent and benign strains of D. nodosus. Additionally, epidemiological data of the farms were collected with the aid of a standardized questionnaire. On four farms, benign strains were diagnosed at each visit; in one farm, benign strains were detected once only. Two flocks revealed sheep infected with virulent D. nodosus throughout the study but without clinical evidence of footrot. In two flocks, the virulent strains of D. nodosus were introduced into the flock during the study period. In one farm, clinical symptoms of virulent footrot were evident only two weeks after the positive finding by PCR. Only individual sheep with previously negative status, but none with previously benign status became infected with virulent strains during the study. The newly developed competitive RT PCR proved to be more sensitive than clinical diagnosis for detecting footrot infection in herds, as it unequivocally classified the four flocks as infected with virulent D. nodosus, even though they did not show clinical signs at the times of sampling. This early detection may be crucial to the success of any control program. Both new infections with virulent strains could be explained by contact with sheep from herds with virulent D. nodosus as evaluated from the questionnaires. These results show that the within-herd eradication of footrot becomes possible using the competitive PCR assay to specifically diagnose virulent D. nodosus