The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) became binding law in the European Union Member States in 2018, as a step toward harmonizing personal data protection legislation in the European Union. The Regulation governs almost all types of personal data processing, hence, also, those pertaining to biomedical research. The purpose of this article is to highlight the main practical issues related to data and biological sample sharing that biomedical researchers face regularly, and to specify how these are addressed in the context of GDPR, after consulting with ethics/legal experts. We identify areas in which clarifications of the GDPR are needed, particularly those related to consent requirements by study participants. Amendments should target the following: (1) restricting exceptions based on national laws and increasing harmonization, (2) confirming the concept of broad consent, and (3) defining a roadmap for secondary use of data. These changes will be achieved by acknowledged learned societies in the field taking the lead in preparing a document giving guidance for the optimal interpretation of the GDPR, which will be finalized following a period of commenting by a broad multistakeholder audience. In parallel, promoting engagement and education of the public in the relevant issues (such as different consent types or residual risk for re-identification), on both local/national and international levels, is considered critical for advancement. We hope that this article will open this broad discussion involving all major stakeholders, toward optimizing the GDPR and allowing a harmonized transnational research approach.

Tumor angiogenesis has been identified to play a critical role in tumor growth and tumor progression, and is regulated by a balance of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic cytokines. Among them VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and its signaling through its receptors are of crucial relevance. Inhibition of VEGF signaling by monoclonal antibodies or small molecules (kinase inhibitors) has already been successfully established for the treatment of different cancer entities and multiple new drugs are being tested in clinical trials. However not all patients are likely to respond to these therapies, but to date there are no reliable biomarkers available to predict therapy response. Many studies integrated biomarker programs in their study protocols, thus several potential biomarkers have been identified which are currently under clinical investigation in prospective randomized studies. This review intends to give an overview of the described potential biomarkers as well as different imaging techniques such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging that can indicate benefit, resistance and toxicity to anti-angiogenic therapies.

In recent years, considerable advances concerning therapeutic strategies in patients with metastatic cancer have been achieved. Particularly in renal cell cancer (RCC) and advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune-activating and antiangiogenic (AA) drugs (i.e., checkpoint antibodies and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptors (VEGFR) targeting compounds, respectively) have been successfully developed. As immune-effector cells have to enter the tumor, it is tempting to speculate that the combination of immunotherapy with AA treatment may induce synergistic effects. In this short review, we explore the theoretical background and the therapeutic potential of this novel treatment option for patients with advanced RCC or NSCLC. We discuss the growing body of evidence that pro-angiogenic factors negatively modulate the T-cell-mediated immune response and examine the preclinical evidence for testing combined immune-activating and AA therapy concepts in clinical practice. Particular attention will also be paid to potential novel treatment-related adverse events induced by combination treatment.

The European Association of Urology guidelines include the lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu) PSMA-617 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand as a therapy option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A major challenge in clinical practice is to pursue a personalized treatment approach based on robust predictive biomarkers. To assess the performance of ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA in real-world practice and to elaborate clinical biomarkers for evaluating treatment responses. We conducted a retrospective observational study including 233 patients with mCRPC treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA in eight high-volume European centers. Baseline characteristics and clinical parameters during and after ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA treatment were documented. Correlations to treatment response were analyzed using χ² and log-rank tests, with differences between groups with and without disease progression calculated using a Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were measured using Cox proportional hazards models. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease of ≥30% was observed in 41.7%, 63.5%, and 77.8% of patients after the first, second, and third treatment cycle, respectively. Restaging performed via PSMA positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed that 33.7% of patients had an imaging-based response, including two patients with a complete response, while 13.4% had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5 mo and the median time until the start of a consecutive antineoplastic therapy was 8.5 mo. Of importance, a PSA decrease ≥30% after the first two cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA (1 cycle: p = 0.0003; 2 cycles: p = 0.004), absolute PSA after the first three cycles (1 cycle: p = 0.011; 2 cycles: p = 0.0005; 3 cycles: p = 0.002), and a PSA doubling time >6 mo (p = 0.009) were significantly correlated to treatment response. Furthermore, gamma-glutamyl transferase ≤31 U/L at the start of ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA therapy was correlated with 1.5 times higher risk of progression for patients without but not with visceral metastases (p = 0.046). ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA is an effective treatment option in mCRPC in the real-world setting. A PSA decrease ≥30% after the first two cycles is an early marker of response that can be easily implemented in clinical practice. ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA is a radioactive agent approved for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. We reviewed its use outside of clinical trials for patients treated at eight European centers. We found that ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA is an effective treatment option in real-world practice. A PSA (prostate-specific antigen) decrease of ≥30% after the first two therapy cycles is an early indicator of response to treatment and can be used in personalizing treatments for patients.

Purpose To report on the oncological outcome of organ-sparing surgery (OSS) compared to (total or partial) penectomy regarding recurrence patterns and survival in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis. Methods This was a retrospective study of all patients with penile SCC and eligible follow-up data of at least 2 years at our institution. Patients with tumors staged ≥ pT1G2 underwent invasive lymph node (LN) staging by dynamic sentinel-node biopsy or modified inguinal lymphadenectomy. Radical inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed when LNs were palpable at diagnosis and in those with a positive LN status after invasive nodal staging. Follow-up visits were assessed, and local, regional and distant recurrences were defined and analyzed. Results 55 patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 63.7 months. Surgical management was OSS in 26 patients (47.2%) and partial or total penectomy in 29 cases (52.8%). Histopathological staging was: pTis (12.7%), pTa (16.3%), pT1a (18.2%), pT1b (5.5%), pT2 (29.1%) and pT3 (18.2%), respectively. Patients in the penectomy group were significantly older (mean 68 vs. 62 years; p = 0.026) with a higher rate of advanced tumor stage (≥ pT2: 44.8% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.002). The local recurrence rate was 42.3% (n = 11) following OSS compared to 10.3% (n = 3) after penectomy (p = 0.007). Kaplan–Meier curves showed no significant differences between the two groups regarding metastasis-free and overall survival. Conclusions OSS is associated with a higher local recurrence rate compared to penectomy, yet it has no negative impact on overall and metastasis-free survival.