Jared Rowland

Dr. Jared Rowland

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2021 in Neuropsychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOAnna S. Ord
Anna S. Ord
RSRobert D. Shura
Robert D. Shura
ASAshley R. Sansone
Ashley R. Sansone
SMSarah L. Martindale
Sarah L. Martindale
KTKatherine H. Taber
Katherine H. Taber
JRJared Rowland
Jared Rowland
To evaluate the relationships among performance validity, symptom validity, symptom self-report, and objective cognitive testing. Combat Veterans (N = 338) completed a neurocognitive assessment battery and several self-report symptom measures assessing depression, PTSD symptoms, sleep quality, pain interference, and neurobehavioral complaints. All participants also completed two performance validity tests (PVTs) and one stand-alone symptom validity test (SVT) along with two embedded SVTs. Results of an exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor solution: Performance Validity, Cognitive Performance, and Symptom Report (SVTs loaded on the third factor). Results of t-tests demonstrated that participants who failed PVTs displayed significantly more severe symptoms and significantly worse performance on most measures of neurocognitive functioning as compared to those who passed. Participants who failed a stand-alone SVT also reported significantly more severe symptomatology on all symptom report measures, but the pattern of cognitive performance differed based on the selected SVT cutoff. Multiple linear regressions revealed that both SVT and PVT failure explained unique variance in symptom report, but only PVT failure significantly predicted cognitive performance. Performance and symptom validity tests measure distinct but related constructs. SVTs and PVTs are significantly related to both cognitive performance and symptom report; however, the relationship between symptom validity and symptom report is strongest. SVTs are also differentially related to cognitive performance and symptom report based on the utilized cutoff score.

1 November 2021 in Journal of Psychiatric Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMSarah L. Martindale
Sarah L. Martindale
AOAnna S. Ord
Anna S. Ord
LRLakeysha G. Rule
Lakeysha G. Rule
JRJared Rowland
Jared Rowland
Blast exposure is common among service members, but the chronic psychiatric effects associated with blast exposure are not well-characterized independent of a resulting mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). This analysis evaluated whether blast exposure severity was independently associated with or exacerbated symptom report beyond posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mild TBI. Participants were Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans (N = 275; 86.55% male), 71.27% with history of blast exposure, 29.82% current diagnosis of PTSD, and 45.45% with mild TBI. All participants completed diagnostic interviews for PTSD, lifetime TBI, and lifetime blast exposure. Self-reported psychiatric and health outcomes included posttraumatic stress symptoms, depressive symptoms, neurobehavioral symptoms, sleep quality, pain interference, and quality of life. Blast severity was associated with PTSD (B = 2.00), depressive (B = 0.76), and neurobehavioral (B = 1.69) symptoms beyond PTSD diagnosis and mild TBI history. Further, blast severity accounted entirely (i.e., indirect/mediation effect) for the association between TBI and posttraumatic stress (B = 1.62), depressive (B = 0.61), and neurobehavioral (B = 1.38) symptoms. No interaction effects were present. Exposure to blast is an independent factor influencing psychiatric symptoms in veterans beyond PTSD and mild TBI. Results highlight that blast exposure severity may be a more relevant risk factor than deployment mild TBI in combat veterans and should be considered in the etiology of psychiatric symptom presentation and complaints. Further, severity of psychological distress due to the combat environment may be an explanatory mechanism by which blast exposure mediates the relationship between mild TBI and symptom outcomes.

31 December 2020 in Rehabilitation Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSarah L. Martindale
Sarah L. Martindale
AOAnna S. Ord
Anna S. Ord
SLSagar S Lad
Sagar S Lad
HMHolly M. Miskey
Holly M. Miskey
KTKatherine H. Taber
Katherine H. Taber
JRJared Rowland
Jared Rowland
Objective: Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) that occurs in a deployment environment is characteristically different from mild TBI that occurs outside of deployment. This study evaluated differential and interaction effects of deployment and nondeployment mild TBI on cognitive and behavioral health outcomes. Research Method: Combat veterans (N = 293) who passed performance-validity measures completed the Mid-Atlantic MIRECC Assessment of TBI (MMA-TBI), Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale (CAPS-5), a neuropsychological assessment battery, and self-report questionnaires. A 2 × 2 × 2 analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate the main and interaction effects across mild TBI groups and PTSD diagnosis. Results: Deployment TBI was associated with poorer outcomes on several cognitive tests: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th edition (WAIS-IV); Working Memory Index (WMI; p = .018); Trail Making Test A (TMT-A; p < .001); and Trail Making Test B (TMT-B; p = .002). Deployment TBI and PTSD were also associated with increased PTSD, depressive, and neurobehavioral symptoms; pain interference; and poorer sleep quality. Nondeployment TBI had no effect on cognitive performance and was associated only with poorer sleep quality. PTSD had the strongest associations with symptom measures and deployment TBI with cognitive outcomes. There were no significant interaction effects after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: Remote outcomes associated with mild deployment TBI are different from those associated with nondeployment mild TBI and are robust beyond PTSD. This suggests that the environment surrounding a TBI event influences cognitive and symptom sequelae. Veterans who experience mild TBI during deployment may report changes in cognition, but most will continue to function within the expected range. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

25 February 2020 in Brain Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJared Rowland
Jared Rowland
SMSarah L. Martindale
Sarah L. Martindale
KSKayla M. Spengler
Kayla M. Spengler
RSRobert D. Shura
Robert D. Shura
KTKatherine H. Taber
Katherine H. Taber
Objective: To comprehensively characterize blast exposure across the lifespan and relationship to TBI. Participants: Post-deployment veterans and service members (N = 287). Design: Prospective cohort recruitment. Main Measures: Salisbury Blast Interview (SBI). Results: 94.4% of participants reported at least one blast event, 75% reported a pressure gradient during a blast event. Participants reported an average of 337.7 (SD = 984.0) blast events (range 0–4857), 64.8% occurring during combat. Across participants, 19.7% reported experiencing a traumatic brain injury (TBI) during a blast event. Subjective ratings of blast characteristics (wind, debris, ground shaking, pressure, temperature, sound) were significantly higher when TBI was experienced and significantly lower when behind cover. Pressure had the strongest association with resulting TBI (AUC = 0.751). Pressure rating of 3 had the best sensitivity (.54)/specificity (.87) with TBI. Logistic regression demonstrated pressure, temperature and distance were the best predictors of TBI, and pressure was the best predictor of primary blast TBI. Conclusion: Results demonstrate the ubiquitous nature of blast events and provide insight into blast characteristics most associated with resulting TBI (pressure, temperature, distance). The SBI provides comprehensive characterization of blast events across the lifespan including the environment, protective factors, blast characteristics and estimates of distance and munition.

18 July 2023 in Journal of Traumatic Stress
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRobert D. Shura
Robert D. Shura
JRJared Rowland
Jared Rowland
HMHolly M. Miskey
Holly M. Miskey
AOAnna S. Ord
Anna S. Ord
AMAnna T. Magnante
Anna T. Magnante
SMSarah L. Martindale
Sarah L. Martindale

7 May 2020 in Rehabilitation Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOAnna S. Ord
Anna S. Ord
SLSagar S. Lad
Sagar S. Lad
RSRobert D. Shura
Robert D. Shura
JRJared Rowland
Jared Rowland
KTKatherine H. Taber
Katherine H. Taber
SMSarah L. Martindale
Sarah L. Martindale
The goal of this study was to examine the associations among posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), sleep quality, pain interference, and quality of life in combat veterans. Veterans (N = 289, 86.51% male) completed the Mid-Atlantic MIRECC Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury, the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5, and measures of sleep quality, pain interference, and quality of life. Hierarchical linear regressions evaluated associations between PTSD severity, deployment TBI severity, sleep quality, and the outcomes of pain interference and quality of life after adjusting for demographic variables and the number of nondeployment TBIs. PTSD severity, B = 0.15, SE B = 0.04, deployment TBI severity, B = 3.98, SE B = 1.01, and sleep quality, B = 0.74, SE B = 0.13, were significantly associated with pain interference, p < .001. PTSD severity, B = -0.57, SE B = 0.07, and pain interference, B = -0.45, SE B = 0.11, were significantly, independently associated with quality of life, p < .001. However, pain interference, B = -0.24, SE B = 0.11, was no longer significantly associated with quality of life when sleep quality, B = -1.56, SE B = 0.25, was included in the model. There was no significant association between deployment TBI severity and quality of life. Interactions among the studied variables were not significant for either of the outcome variables. PTSD symptom severity, deployment TBI history, and sleep quality may be important to consider in treatment planning for veterans experiencing pain-related functional interference. For veterans with numerous conditions comorbid with pain, treatment plans may include interventions targeting sleep and PTSD to maximize quality of life improvements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).