Evelina Manvelyan

Dr. Evelina Manvelyan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 October 2024 in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEvelina Manvelyan
Evelina Manvelyan
ASAbha Rajendra Sathe
Abha Rajendra Sathe
DLDavid Paul Lindars
David Paul Lindars
LALusine Aghajanova
Lusine Aghajanova

26 April 2023 in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEvelina Manvelyan
Evelina Manvelyan
BABaruch Abittan
Baruch Abittan
WSWeiwei Shan
Weiwei Shan
DSDisha Shahani
Disha Shahani
BKBrittany Kwait
Brittany Kwait
MBMatthew Blitz
Matthew Blitz

4 March 2024 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLilit Harutyunyan
Lilit Harutyunyan
EMEvelina Manvelyan
Evelina Manvelyan
NKNune Karapetyan
Nune Karapetyan
SBSamvel Bardakhchyan
Samvel Bardakhchyan
AJAram Jilavyan
Aram Jilavyan
GJGagik Jilavyan
Gagik Jilavyan
Background: Annually, approximately 200 new ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed in Armenia, which is considered an upper-middle-income country. This study aimed to summarize the survival outcomes of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer in Armenia based on the type of recurrence, risk factors, and choice of systemic treatment. Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 228 patients with relapsed ovarian cancer from three different institutions. Results: The median age of the patients was 55. The median follow-up times from relapse and primary diagnosis were 21 and 48 months, respectively. The incidence of platinum-sensitive relapse was 81.6% (186), while platinum-resistant relapse was observed in only 18.4% (42) of patients. The median post-progression survival of the platinum-sensitive group compared to the platinum-resistant group was 54 vs. 25 months (p < 0.001), respectively, while the median survival after relapse was 25 vs. 13 months, respectively; three- and five-year post-progression survival rates in these groups were 31.2% vs. 23.8%, and 15.1% vs. 9.5%, respectively (p = 0.113). Conclusions: Overall, despite new therapeutic approaches, ovarian cancer continues to be one of the deadly malignant diseases affecting women, especially in developing countries with a lack of resources, where chemotherapy remains the primary available systemic treatment for the majority of patients. Low survival rates demonstrate the urgent need for more research focused on this group of patients with poor outcomes.

19 January 2021 in Human Fertility
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEvelina Manvelyan
Evelina Manvelyan
SHSahar Houshdaran
Sahar Houshdaran
JIJuan Irwin
Juan Irwin
LGLinda C. Giudice
Linda C. Giudice
LALusine Aghajanova
Lusine Aghajanova
In patients with high serum E2 embryo transfer is often postponed, as high E2 levels adversely affect embryo transfer outcome. We aimed to determine if stratified serum oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels differentially affect endometrial histology and endometrial oestrogen and progesterone receptor protein levels. Endometrial biopsies were collected from oocyte donors. Samples were divided based on peak serum E2 levels into three groups: (i) low-E2 (n = 33) E2≤2999pg/mL; (ii) mid-E2 (n = 40) E2 3000–4999 pg/mL; and (iii) high-E2 (n = 15) E2≥5000 pg/mL. Oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptors A and B (PR) protein levels in endometrial stroma (S), glandular (GE) and luminal (LE) epithelia were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Samples in high-E2 group demonstrated strongest association with accelerated endometrial maturation (2 (1–2); 2 (1–3); and 3 (2.8–3) median days of advancement of endometrial maturation respectively in low, mid, high-E2 groups, p = 0.046). There were significant differences in ERα and PR immunoexpression in S, GE and LE among the groups (p < 0.05). Higher E2 levels were associated with decreased ERα expression (p < 0.017) in GE and LE, and increased PR expression in S and GE (p < 0.011 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Higher serum E2 levels were associated with impaired endometrial steroid hormone receptor expression, higher serum P4 and more advancement of endometrial maturation.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCatherine Haering
Catherine Haering
EMEvelina Manvelyan
Evelina Manvelyan
KCKathryn Coyne
Kathryn Coyne
LHLauren Alexis Hyams
Lauren Alexis Hyams
JHJames Hamrick
James Hamrick
Sung Tae KimSung Tae Kim
Sung Tae Kim
A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with a pre-catching sperm (PCS)-ICSI technique. Cases with at least 0.5 million motile sperm and 5 mature oocytes were included. Conventional ICSI involves simultaneous loading of sperm and oocytes onto the dish, followed by identification, immobilization, and loading of sperm into pipettes for oocyte injection. In the PCS-ICSI technique, suitable sperm were identified and immobilized prior to oocyte loading onto the dish, thus reducing the oocyte exposure time. Variables of interest included rate of fertilized and degenerated oocytes, abnormal fertilization, quality blastocyst formation, and pregnancy outcomes. Statistical analysis utilized Student’s t-test and Fisher’s Exact Test. Our study included 330 PCS-ICSI and 287 conventional ICSI cases. Female age, BMI, AMH, total number of collected oocytes, and rate of abnormal fertilization were similar between groups. The PCS-ICSI group demonstrated an increased rate of oocyte fertilization (84.0% vs. 79.3%, p < 0.001), good quality blastocyst formation (54.9% vs. 48.0%, p < 0.001), and a lower rate of oocyte degeneration (1.4% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001). Positive pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rate were similar between groups. The expansion of this technique resulted in increased oocyte fertilization and good quality blastocyst formation, and decreased oocyte degeneration. Further studies will evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in broader patient populations.

30 July 2025 in F&S Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEvelina Manvelyan
Evelina Manvelyan
AMAgnes Manvelyan
Agnes Manvelyan
KCKathryn Coyne
Kathryn Coyne
RFRebecca Flyckt
Rebecca Flyckt
RWRachel Weinerman
Rachel Weinerman