Yu Fu

Dr. Yu Fu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 March 2018 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YFYu Fu
Yu Fu
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
DLDengfeng Li
Dengfeng Li
HLHai Lin
Hai Lin
The giant Beiya Au skarn deposit (over 300 tonnes Au metal reserve) is located in the middle part of the Jinshajiang-Ailaoshan alkaline porphyry metallogenic belt. The deposit is the largest Au skarn deposit and third largest Au deposit in China. In this paper, we present garnet U-Pb ages and trace element geochemical data from two types of skarn-related U-rich garnet from Beiya, and discuss their implications on skarn metallogenesis. Based on optical characteristics and major element compositions, the older Grt I and the younger Grt II (both belong to the grossular-andradite solid solution) are distinguishable: Grt II (Adr69.0Grs26.8–Adr93.5Grs1.5) is slightly richer in Fe than Grt I (Adr68.5Grs20.3–Adr86.3Grs3.4), with the average FeO contents being 25.0% and 24.5%, respectively. LA-ICP-MS garnet U-Pb dating yielded lower intercept ages of 35.8 ± 0.8 Ma (MSWD = 0.9, n = 20) and 34.0 ± 2.1 Ma (MSWD = 1.2, n = 16), respectively. These ages represent the timing of the garnet crystallization, and are consistent with published alteration ages within error, which suggests that the technique presented provides a reliable alternative in dating skarn alteration. Grt I has higher U content and lower Th/U ratio than Grt II, indicating a lower oxygen fugacity for the earlier skarn alteration. Grt II shows weak (or no) Eu anomaly and lower LREE/HREE ratios than those of Grt I, which indicates that Grt I and Grt II may have formed under a mildly acidic and nearly neutral condition, respectively. From the early prograde skarn (Grt I) to late prograde skarn (Grt II) stage, the ore-forming fluids may have changed from a relatively reduced acidic to a relatively oxidized neutral pH condition.

1 January 2018 in Ore Geology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDengfeng Li
Dengfeng Li
YFYu Fu
Yu Fu
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
PHPete Hollings
Pete Hollings
JLJianlin Liao
Jianlin Liao
KLKit Lai
Kit Lai

19 December 2017 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YFYu Fu
Yu Fu
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
DLDengfeng Li
Dengfeng Li
HLHai Lin
Hai Lin
KLKit Lai
Kit Lai
The giant Beiya Au skarn deposit and Machangqing porphyry Cu-Mo-(Au) deposit are located in the middle part of the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan alkaline porphyry metallogenic belt. The Beiya deposit is the largest Au skarn deposit in China, whilst the Machangqing deposit comprises a well-developed porphyry-skarn-epithermal Cu-Mo-(Au) mineral system. In this paper, we present new allanite U-Th-Pb ages and trace element geochemical data from the two deposits and discuss their respective skarn metallogenesis. Based on the mineral assemblage, texture and Th/U ratio, the allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits are likely hydrothermal rather than magmatic. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) allanite U-Th-Pb dating has yielded Th-Pb isochron ages of 33.4 ± 4.6 Ma (MSWD = 0.22) (Beiya) and 35.4 ± 9.8 Ma (MSWD = 0.26) (Machangqing), representing the retrograde alteration and magnetite skarn mineralization age of the two deposits. The Beiya and Machangqing alkali porphyry-related mineralization are synchronous and genetically linked to the magmatic hydrothermal activities of the Himalayan orogenic event. Major and trace element compositions reveal that the Beiya allanite has higher Fe3+/(Fe3+ + Fe2+) ratios, U content and Th content than the Machangqing allanite, which indicate a higher oxygen fugacity and F content for the ore-forming fluids at Beiya. Such differences in the ore-forming fluids may have contributed to the different metallogenic scales and metal types in the Beiya and Machangqing deposit.

7 November 2022 in Ore Geology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XGXianqing Gao
Xianqing Gao
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
YFYu Fu
Yu Fu
QLQiaofen Liu
Qiaofen Liu

31 October 2025 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YFYu Fu
Yu Fu
FHFei Huang
Fei Huang
XSXiaoming Sun
Xiaoming Sun
XJXiaodong Jiang
Xiaodong Jiang
JCJieyun Chen
Jieyun Chen
ARAndrew P. Roberts
Andrew P. Roberts
Rare earth elements and yttrium (REY) are critical for advanced technological and environmental applications. REY‐enriched deep‐sea sediments have attracted attention as significant potential REY resources. However, efficient identification of these deposits in the open oceans is a persistent challenge. From integrated chemical leaching experiments and geochemical and rock magnetic analyses of two Eastern Pacific Ocean sediment cores, we find a coupled evolution between magnetic signatures and REY concentrations in sediment profiles. Apatite and Fe‐Mn (oxy)hydroxides are the primary REY carriers, while biogenic magnetite dominates the magnetic mineral assemblage. We elucidate here mechanistic linkages between mineral magnetic signals and REY enrichment, demonstrating their shared dependence on deep‐sea productivity cycles and redox dynamics. We propose that systematic magnetic property analyses could serve as a novel geophysical proxy for identifying REY‐rich sediment in marine environments.