Domencio  Beneventano

Prof. Domencio Beneventano

Dipartimento di Ingegneria "Enzo Ferrari" – DIEF, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Vivarelli 10 - int. 1 - 41125 Modena, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2001 in Data & Knowledge Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSonia Bergamaschi
Sonia Bergamaschi
SCSilvana Castano
Silvana Castano
Maurizio VinciniMaurizio Vincini
Maurizio Vincini
DBDomencio Beneventano
Domencio Beneventano

31 December 2013 in The Astrophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAndrea Bulgarelli
Andrea Bulgarelli
MTM. Trifoglio
M. Trifoglio
FGF. Gianotti
F. Gianotti
MTM. Tavani
M. Tavani
NPNicolò Parmiggiani
Nicolò Parmiggiani
LSL. Salotti
L. Salotti

1 March 2003 in ACM Transactions on Database Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDomencio Beneventano
Domencio Beneventano
SBSonia Bergamaschi
Sonia Bergamaschi
CSClaudio Sartori
Claudio Sartori
Semantic query optimization uses semantic knowledge (i.e., integrity constraints) to transform a query into an equivalent one that may be answered more efficiently. This article proposes a general method for semantic query optimization in the framework of Object-Oriented Database Systems. The method is effective for a large class of queries, including conjunctive recursive queries expressed with regular path expressions and is based on three ingredients. The first is a Description Logic, ODL RE , providing a type system capable of expressing: class descriptions, queries, views, integrity constraint rules and inference techniques, such as incoherence detection and subsumption computation. The second is a semantic expansion function for queries, which incorporates restrictions logically implied by the query and the schema (classes + rules) in one query. The third is an optimal rewriting method of a query with respect to the schema classes that rewrites a query into an equivalent one, by determining more specialized classes to be accessed and by reducing the number of factors. We implemented the method in a tool providing an ODMG-compliant interface that allows a full interaction with OQL queries, wrapping underlying Description Logic representation and techniques to the user.


1 June 2021 in The Astrophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNicolò Parmiggiani
Nicolò Parmiggiani
ABAndrea Bulgarelli
Andrea Bulgarelli
VFV. Fioretti
V. Fioretti
APAmbra Di Piano
Ambra Di Piano
Andrea GiulianiAndrea Giuliani
Andrea Giuliani
AMAntonio Macaluso
Antonio Macaluso
The follow-up of external science alerts received from gamma-ray burst (GRB) and gravitational wave detectors is one of the AGILE Team’s current major activities. The AGILE team developed an automated real-time analysis pipeline to analyze AGILE Gamma-Ray Imaging Detector (GRID) data to detect possible counterparts in the energy range 0.1–10 GeV. This work presents a new approach for detecting GRBs using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to classify the AGILE-GRID intensity maps by improving the GRB detection capability over the Li & Ma method, currently used by the AGILE team. The CNN is trained with large simulated data sets of intensity maps. The AGILE complex observing pattern due to the so-called “spinning mode” is studied to prepare data sets to test and evaluate the CNN. A GRB emission model is defined from the second Fermi-LAT GRB catalog and convoluted with the AGILE observing pattern. Different p-value distributions are calculated, evaluating, using the CNN, millions of background-only maps simulated by varying the background level. The CNN is then used on real data to analyze the AGILE-GRID data archive, searching for GRB detections using the trigger time and position taken from the Swift-BAT, Fermi-GBM, and Fermi-LAT GRB catalogs. From these catalogs, the CNN detects 21 GRBs with a significance of ≥3σ, while the Li & Ma method detects only two GRBs. The results shown in this work demonstrate that the CNN is more effective in detecting GRBs than the Li & Ma method in this context and can be implemented into the AGILE-GRID real-time analysis pipeline.

13 March 2011
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
SBSonia Bergamaschi
Sonia Bergamaschi
DBDomencio Beneventano
Domencio Beneventano
FGFrancesco GUERRA
Francesco GUERRA
MOMirko Orsini
Mirko Orsini