Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) usually respond to initial combination chemotherapy, but the disease inevitably relapses and often follows an aggressive course. Here, clinical study results published since 2008 for patients with relapsed/refractory MCL were reviewed to compare available evidence for treatment guidance. Most trials identified were non-randomized, phase II studies performed at a limited number of sites, and many evaluated MCL as one of multiple non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. Additional randomized, comparative trials are needed. Treatment selection generally depends on patient need, age and fitness, time of relapse, and line of therapy. Combination regimens typically produce higher response rates than single agents, and adding rituximab generally improves outcomes. The inclusion of ibrutinib, lenalidomide, temsirolimus, and bortezomib, represents an important advance for patients ineligible for, unable to tolerate, or failing high-intensity combination chemotherapy. A high need for effective treatments in relapsed/refractory MCL remains, particularly for elderly and frail patients.

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze outcome of patients with Hodgkin’s disease (HD) in whom first-line chemotherapy with mustine/vincristine/procarbazine/prednisone (MOPP) had failed. Patients and methods: From January 1982 to December 1989 among 210 patients treated with MOPP and radiotherapy to initial bulky sites, 65 patients were primary refractory to or relapsed after initial treatment. Results: Twenty-nine of 65 patients (44%) were primary refractory to initial chemotherapy, 20 relapsed within 12 months after complete remission (CR) and 16 relapsed after CR that lasted more than 12 months. Patients with primary refractory HD and early relapse (12 months after CR) MOPP was repeated. The median follow-up for all patients was 115 months. The overall response rate was 63%. Thirty-three patients (51%) achieved a second CR and eight patients (12%) partial response. Remission rate was greatest in patients with late relapse (CR >12 months) (75 versus 55% for early relapse versus 35% for primary refractory HD) (P <0.01). At 10 years, overall and failure-free survival rates were 21 and 16%, respectively. Patients who were in first remission longer than 12 months had a superior overall survival (37 versus 18% for early relapse) and failure-free survival (24 versus 10% for early relapse). No patient with primary refractory HD was alive beyond 52 months after initial treatment failure (P <0.01). Main prognostic factors were duration of the first remission and tumor bulk at relapse. Conclusions: Our results confirm previous observations that a significant proportion of patients with HD who experience induction treatment failure cannot be cured with conventional treatment and probably need more aggressive therapy.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has had a profound global impact. The emergence of several variants during the pandemic has presented numerous challenges in preventing and managing this disease. The development of vaccines has played a pivotal role in controlling the pandemic, with a significant portion of the global population being vaccinated. This, along with the emergence of less virulent SARS-CoV-2 variants, has led to a reduction in the severity of COVID-19 outcomes for the overall population. Nevertheless, individuals with immunocompromising conditions continue to face challenges given their suboptimal response to vaccination and vulnerability to severe COVID-19. This expert review synthesizes recent published evidence regarding the economic and human impact of COVID-19 on such individuals. The literature suggests that rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation use were high during the pre-Omicron era, and remained high during Omicron and later, despite vaccination for this population. Moreover, studies indicated that these individuals experienced a negative impact on their mental health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to those without immunocompromising conditions, with elevated levels of anxiety, depression, and distress reported. Further, these individuals with immunocompromising conditions experienced substantial costs associated with COVID-19 and loss of income during the pandemic, though the evidence on the economic burden of COVID-19 in such individuals is limited. Generally, COVID-19 has increased healthcare resource use and costs, impaired mental health, and reduced HRQoL in those with varied immunocompromising conditions compared to both those without COVID-19 and the general population—underscoring the importance of continued real-world studies. Ongoing research is crucial to assess the ongoing burden of COVID-19 in vaccinated individuals with immunocompromising conditions who are still at risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes to ensure their needs are not disproportionately worse than the general population.

Tumor bulk is an established prognostic factor in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but most patients with limited-stage (LS) HL do not have “bulk” by standard definitions. In the RAPID trial, maximum tumor diameter (MTD) was associated with relapse risk in LS-HL patients achieving positron emission tomography negativity (PET-) after doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). We aimed to externally validate these findings in the H10 trial. Stage I/IIA HL patients, without mediastinal bulk, who achieved PET- with ABVD were included. Patients received 3 ABVD plus radiotherapy (n = 208) or 3 ABVD alone (n = 211) in RAPID, and 3 to 4 ABVD plus radiotherapy (n = 556) or 4 to 6 ABVD alone (n = 303) in H10. MTD was strongly associated with event-free survival (relapse or HL-related death) in H10 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.38; P = .003), a similar effect to that seen in RAPID (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39; P = .02), giving an estimated 21% risk increase per centimeter MTD (HRpooled, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09-1.33; P < .001). Effect sizes were similar for patients treated with ABVD alone and ABVD plus radiotherapy, with no differential effect (pinteraction = 0.97). Treatment modality and MTD were independent risk factors; patients with higher MTD receiving chemotherapy alone had the greatest relapse risk. This international validation study confirms MTD is strongly associated with relapse risk in patients with LS-HL achieving PET- and informs decision-making around risk-adapted application of radiotherapy. The trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00943423 and #NCT00433433.

Disease- and treatment-mediated immunodeficiency might render SARS-CoV-2 vaccines less effective in patients with hematologic diseases. We performed a prospective non-interventional study to evaluate humoral response after one and two doses of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in 118 patients with different malignant or non-malignant hematologic diseases from three Croatian treatment centers. An electrochemiluminescent assay was used to measure total anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD antibody titers. After one vaccine dose, 20/66 (33%) achieved seropositivity with a median antibody titer of 6.1 U/mL. The response rate (58/90, 64.4%) and median antibody titer (>250 U/mL) were higher after two doses. Seropositivity varied with diagnosis (overall p < 0.001), with the lowest rates in lymphoma (34.6%) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (52.5%). The overall response rate in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (CMPN) was 81.3% but reached 100% in chronic myeloid leukemia and other non-myelofibrosis CMPN. At univariable analysis, age > 67 years, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, active treatment, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy increased the likelihood of no vaccine response, while hematopoietic stem cell recipients were more likely to respond. Age and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy remained associated with no response in a multivariable model. Patients with the hematologic disease have attenuated responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and significant variations in different disease subgroups warrant an individualized approach.