Nihal Wilde

Dr. Nihal Wilde


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 May 2023 in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTTetsu Tanaka
Tetsu Tanaka
ASAtsushi Sugiura
Atsushi Sugiura
RKRefik Kavsur
Refik Kavsur
CÖCan Öztürk
Can Öztürk
JVJohanna Vogelhuber
Johanna Vogelhuber
MWMarcel Weber
Marcel Weber
The role of right ventricular function in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) is poorly understood. This study investigated the association of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) assessed by cardiac computed tomography (CCT) with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TTVR. We retrospectively assessed three-dimensional (3D) RVEF by using pre-procedural CCT images in patients undergoing TTVR. RV dysfunction was defined as a CT-RVEF of <45%. The primary outcome was a composite outcome, consisting of all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure, within 1 year after TTVR. Of 157 patients, 58 (36.9%) presented with CT-RVEF <45%. Procedural success and in-hospital mortality were comparable between patients with CT-RVEF <45% and ≥45%. However, CT-RVEF of <45% was associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (hazard ratio: 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.65–5.41; P = 0.001), which had an additional value beyond two-dimensional echocardiographic assessments of RV function to stratify the risk of the composite outcome. In addition, patients with CT-RVEF ≥45% exhibited the association of procedural success (i.e. residual tricuspid regurgitation of ≤2+ at discharge) with a decreased risk of the composite outcome, while this association was attenuated in those with CT-RVEF <45% (P for interaction = 0.035). CT-RVEF is associated with the risk of the composite outcome after TTVR, and a reduced CT-RVEF might attenuate the prognostic benefit of TR reduction. The assessment of 3D-RVEF by using CCT may refine the patient selection for TTVR.

4 October 2023 in Clinical Research in Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JVJohanna Vogelhuber
Johanna Vogelhuber
TTTetsu Tenaka
Tetsu Tenaka
MSMitsumasa Sudo
Mitsumasa Sudo
ASAtsushi Sugiura
Atsushi Sugiura
CÖCan Öztürk
Can Öztürk
NWNihal Wilde
Nihal Wilde
Background: Obesity and underweight represent classical risk factors for outcome in patients treated for cardiovascular disease. This study describes the impact of different body mass index (BMI) categories on 1-year clinical outcome in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing transcatheter-edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Methods: We analyzed 211 consecutive patients (age 78.3 ± 7.2 years, 55.5% female, median EuroSCORE II 9.6 ± 6.7) with tricuspid regurgitation undergoing TEER from June 2015 until May 2021. Patients were prospectively enrolled in our single center registry and were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified according to body mass index (BMI) into 4 groups: BMI < 20 kg/m2 (underweight), BMI 20.0 to < 25.0 kg/m2 (normal weight), BMI 25.0 to > 30.0 kg/m2 (overweight) and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (obese). Results: Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated inferior survival for underweight and obese patients, but comparable outcomes for normal and overweight patients (global log rank test, p < 0.01). Cardiovascular death was significantly higher in underweight patients compared to the other groups (24.1% vs. 7.0% vs. 6.3% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.01). Over all, there were comparable rates of bleeding, stroke and myocardial infarction. Multivariable Cox regression analysis (adjusted for age, gender, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, left-ventricular ejection fraction) confirmed underweight (HR 3.88; 95% CI 1.64–7.66; p < 0.01) and obesity (HR 3.24; 95% CI 1.37–9.16; p < 0.01) as independent risk factors for 1-year all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Compared to normal weight and overweight patients, obesity and underweight patients undergoing TEER display significant higher 1-year all-cause mortality. Graphical

28 February 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMiriam Silaschi
Miriam Silaschi
FCFranca Cattelaens
Franca Cattelaens
HAHossien Alirezaei
Hossien Alirezaei
JVJohanna Vogelhuber
Johanna Vogelhuber
SSSusanne Claudia Sommer
Susanne Claudia Sommer
NWNihal Wilde
Nihal Wilde
Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIC-MVS) has been established as preferred treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR), but mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair (M-TEER) is routinely performed in patients at high surgical risk and is increasingly performed in intermediate risk patients. Methods: From 2010 to 2021, we performed 723 M-TEER and 123 isolated MIC-MVS procedures. We applied a sensitivity analysis by matching age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), EuroSCORE II and etiology of MR. Results: Baseline characteristics showed significant differences in the overall cohort (p < 0.01): age 78.3 years vs. 61.5 years, EuroSCORE II 5.5% vs. 1.3% and LVEF 48.4% vs. 60.4% in M-TEER vs. MIC-MVS patients. Grade of MR at discharge was moderate/severe in 24.5% (171/697) in M-TEER vs. 6.5% (8/123) in MIC-MVS (p < 0.01). One-year survival was 91.5% (552/723) in M-TEER vs. 97.6% (95/123) in MIC-MVS (p = 0.04). A matching with 49 pairs (n = 98) showed comparable survival during follow-up, but a numerically higher mean mitral valve gradient of 4.1 mmHg (95% CI: 3.6–4.6) vs. 3.4 mmHg (95% CI: 3.0–3.8) in M-TEER (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Patients undergoing M-TEER had lower one-year survival than MIC-MVS, but differences disappeared after matching. Reduction in MR was less effective in M-TEER patients and postprocedural mitral valve gradients were higher.

17 January 2022 in Heart
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NWNihal Wilde
Nihal Wilde
MRMarc Rogmann
Marc Rogmann
VMVictor Mauri
Victor Mauri
KPKerstin Piayda
Kerstin Piayda
MSMarie-Therese Schmitz
Marie-Therese Schmitz
ASAlexander Sedaghat
Alexander Sedaghat
Objectives This study aimed to investigate early haemodynamic and clinical performance of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3 Ultra) transcatheter heart valve (THV) system in comparison to its precursor, the SAPIEN 3 (S3). Previous studies have indicated potential haemodynamic differences between the S3 Ultra and S3. Such differences may impact clinical outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods Postprocedural haemodynamic performance and 30-day clinical outcome were compared in patients who underwent TAVI receiving either the S3 or the new S3 Ultra prostheses. Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to identify factors associated with higher mean transvalvular gradients. Results We included 697 patients (S3 Ultra: n=314, S3: n=383) from the multicentre RhineHeart TAVI Registry. Patients receiving the S3 Ultra prosthesis showed significantly higher postprocedural mean transvalvular gradients (14.2±4.8 vs 10.2±4.4 mm Hg; p<0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analyses and additional PSM revealed the use of the S3 Ultra to be associated with higher postprocedural mean transvalvular gradients (p<0.01). 30-day clinical outcomes, such as mortality, myocardial infarction, permanent pacemaker implantation and vascular complications were comparable between the groups. Conclusions The new S3 Ultra THV was associated with a higher postprocedural mean transvalvular gradient compared with the S3 system, while there was no difference in mortality or adverse clinical outcomes at 30 days. These echocardiographic differences will require long-term studies to assess the clinical relevance of this finding.

27 April 2023 in Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NWNihal Wilde
Nihal Wilde
VMVictor Mauri
Victor Mauri
KPKerstin Piayda
Kerstin Piayda
BABaravan Al-Kassou
Baravan Al-Kassou
JSJasmin Shamekhi
Jasmin Shamekhi
ASAlexander Sedaghat
Alexander Sedaghat
Left-ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) is associated with improved outcome in heart failure patients. Factors associated with and predictive for LVRR in low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG AS) patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and its impact on outcome were assessed. Pre- and post-procedural left-ventricular (LV) function and volume were investigated in 219 LFLG patients. LVRR was defined as an absolute increase of ≥ 10% in LVEF and reduction of ≥ 15% in LV end-systolic volume. The primary endpoint was the combination of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure. Mean LVEF was 35.0 ± 10.0% with a stroke volume index (SVI) of 25.9 ± 6.0ml/m2 and a LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) of 94.04 ± 46.0ml. At a median of 5.2 months (IQR 2.7 - 8.1months), 77.2 % (n=169) of the patients showed echocardiographic evidence of LVRR. A multivariable model revealed three independent factors for LVRR after TAVI: 1) SVI of < 25ml/m2 (HR 2.31, 95%CI 1.08 - 3.58; p < 0.01), 2) LVEF < 30% (HR 2.76, 95%CI 1.53 - 2.91; p < 0.01) and 3) valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) < 5mmHg/ml/m2 (HR 5.36, 95%CI 1.80 - 15.98; p < 0.01). Patients without evidence of LVRR showed significantly higher incidence of the one-year combined endpoint (32 (64.0%) vs. 75 (44.4%); p < 0.01). The majority of patients with LFLG AS show LVRR after TAVI, which is associated with favorable outcome. An SVI of < 25ml/m2, LVEF < 30% and Zva < 5mmHg/ml/m2 represent predictors of LVRR.

1 February 2022 in International Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMitsumasa Sudo
Mitsumasa Sudo
ASAtsushi Sugiura
Atsushi Sugiura
LTLouisa Treiling
Louisa Treiling
BABaravan Al-Kassou
Baravan Al-Kassou
JSJasmin Shamekhi
Jasmin Shamekhi
ASAlexander Sedaghat
Alexander Sedaghat