Xiaojia He

Dr. Xiaojia He

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2013 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKavitha Pathakoti
Kavitha Pathakoti
SMShavonda Morrow
Shavonda Morrow
CHChangseok Han
Changseok Han
MPMiguel Pelaez
Miguel Pelaez
Xiaojia HeXiaojia He
Xiaojia He
HHHuey-Min Hwang
Huey-Min Hwang

1 January 2014 in Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKavitha Pathakoti
Kavitha Pathakoti
MHMing-Ju Huang
Ming-Ju Huang
JWJohn D. Watts
John D. Watts
Xiaojia HeXiaojia He
Xiaojia He
HHHuey-Min Hwang
Huey-Min Hwang

1 March 2014 in Journal of Food and Drug Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Xiaojia HeXiaojia He
Xiaojia He
WAWinfred G. Aker
Winfred G. Aker
JLJerzy Leszczynski
Jerzy Leszczynski
HHHuey-Min Hwang
Huey-Min Hwang
In this report, we critically reviewed selected intrinsic physicochemical properties of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) and their role in the interaction of the ENMs with the immediate surroundings in representative aquatic environments. The behavior of ENMs with respect to dynamic microenvironments at the nano-bio-eco interface level, and the resulting impact on their toxicity, fate, and exposure potential are elaborated. Based on this literature review, we conclude that a holistic approach is urgently needed to fulfill our knowledge gap regarding the safety of discharged ENMs. This comparative approach affords the capability to recognize and understand the potential hazards of ENMs and their toxicity mechanisms, and ultimately to establish a quantitative and reliable system to predict such outcomes.

1 September 2014 in Microbiological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xiaojia HeXiaojia He
Xiaojia He
HHHuey-Min Hwang
Huey-Min Hwang
WAWinfred G. Aker
Winfred G. Aker
PWPeng Wang
Peng Wang
YLYunfeng Lin
Yunfeng Lin
XHXiaoyu He
Xiaoyu He

16 June 2015 in Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Xiaojia HeXiaojia He
Xiaojia He
WAWinfred G. Aker
Winfred G. Aker
MHMing-Ju Huang
Ming-Ju Huang
JWJohn D. Watts
John D. Watts
HHHuey-Min Hwang
Huey-Min Hwang
Metal oxide nanomaterials have exhibited excellent performance as nanomedicines in photodynamic therapy (PDT) for cancer and infection treatment. Their unique and tunable physicochemical properties advance them as promising alternatives in drug delivery, early diagnosis, imaging, and treatment against various tumors and infectious diseases. Moreover, the implementation of nanophototherapy in deep tissue sites is enhanced by advancements in photosensitization technology. Notwithstanding the progress made in emerging metal oxide nanomaterials-derived PDT, the potential toxicity towards adjunct tissues associated with this approach remains challenging. Regulation and legislation have also been recommended and subsequently enacted in response to public concerns related to large-scale production, transportation, use, and disposal of those nanomaterials. Consequently, a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) paradigm has been adopted and is widely used in evaluating and predicting the side effects of nanomedicines, thus influencing their design and fabrication. This article briefly reviews the application of metal oxide nanomaterials in PDT and their associated adverse impacts as reported in recent publications. The future trends and implications of this platform in nanomedicine are also highlighted. However, more studies and efforts have to be carried out for developing novel nano-therapeutics with high selectivity, sensitivity, biocompatibility, and minimal side effects in PDT.

25 April 2014 in Nanotoxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xiaojia HeXiaojia He
Xiaojia He
WAWinfred G. Aker
Winfred G. Aker
HHHuey-Min Hwang
Huey-Min Hwang
The role of light on the acute toxicities of S-doped and Sigma TiO2 nanoparticles in zebrafish was studied. Metrics included mortality for both, and rheotaxis dysfunction and DNA damage for S-doped only. It was found that the acute toxicity of S-TiO2 nanoparticles was enhanced by simulated sunlight (SSL) irradiation (96-h LC50 of 116.56 ppm) and exceeded that of Sigma TiO2, which was essentially non-toxic. Behavioral disorder, in terms of rheotaxis, was significantly increased by treatment with S-TiO2 nanoparticles under SSL irradiation. In order to further understand its toxicity mechanism, we investigated hair cells in neuromasts of the posterior lateral line (PLL) using DASPEI staining. Significant hair cell damage was observed in the treated larvae. The Comet assay was employed to investigate the DNA damage, which might be responsible for the loss of hair cells. Production of the superoxide anion ([Formula: see text]), a major ROS generated by TiO2 nanoparticles, was assayed and used to postulate causative factors to account for these damages. Oxidative effects were most severe in the liver, heart, intestine, pancreatic duct, and pancreatic islet - results consistent with our earlier findings in the investigation of embryonic malformation. TEM micrographs, used to further investigate the fate of S-TiO2 nanoparticles at the cellular level, suggested receptor-mediated autophagy and vacuolization. Our findings validate the benefit of using the transparent zebrafish embryo as an in vivo model for evaluating photo-induced nanotoxicity. These results highlight the importance of conducting a systematic risk assessment in connection with the use of doped TiO2 nanoparticles in aquatic ecosystems.