Critical elements in coal and coal-bearing sequences (e.g., Li, Sc, V, Ga, Ge, Se, Y and rare earth elements, Zr, Nb, Au, Ag, platinum group elements, Re, and U) have attracted great attention because their concentrations in some cases may be comparable to those of conventional ore deposits. The enrichment of critical elements in coals, particularly those of Carboniferous-Permian and Cenozoic ages, have generally been attributed to within-plate (plume-related) volcanism and associated hydrothermal activity. However, Cretaceous coals are not commonly rich in critical elements, with the exception of some (e.g., Ge and U) in localised areas. This paper globally reviewed metalliferous coals from Siberia, the Russian Far East, Mongolia, South America, the United States and Mexico, Canada (Alberta and British Columbia), China, Africa, and Australasia (Victoria, Queensland, New South Wales, South Australia, Northern Territory, New Zealand, Nelson, West Coast, Canterbury, Otago, and Southland). The world-class Ge-U or Ge deposits in North China, Mongolia, and Siberia are the only commercially significant representatives of the Cretaceous metalliferous coals, which are related to bio-chemical reduction of oxidized meteoric, hydrothermal, or sea waters by organic matter of the peat bogs. The common Cretaceous coals worldwide are generally not rich in critical elements because intensive igneous activity led to extensive acidification of terrestrial and marine waters, which are responsible for the low coal metallogenesis during the Cretaceous period, especially the Early Cretaceous time.

Plugs of lignite coal from multiple formations were subjected to a series of tests to determine the amount of rare-earth elements (REEs) to be extracted from coal in an in situ mining operation. These tests were used to determine if extraction of REEs and other critical minerals in an in situ environment would be possible for future attempts as an alternative to extraction mining. The tests involved subjecting whole lignite coal plugs from the Twin Butte coal seams in North Dakota to flow-through tests of water, and concentrations of 1.0 M ammonium nitrate, 1.0 M and 1.5 M sulfuric acid, and 1.0 M and 1.5 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) solvents at different concentrations and combinations. The flow-through testing was conducted by alternating the solvent and water flow-through to simulate an in situ mining scenario. The samples were analyzed for their concentrations of REEs (lanthanum [La], cerium [Ce], praseodymium [Pr], neodymium [Nd], samarium [Sm], europium [Eu], gadolinium [Gd], terbium [Tb], dysprosium [Dy], holmium [Ho], erbium [Er], thulium [Tm], ytterbium [Yb], lutetium [Lu], yttrium [Y], and scandium [Sc], as well as germanium [Ge] and cobalt [Co], manganese [Mn], nickel [Ni], and barium [Ba]). Results from the testing showed that REEs were extracted in concentrations that were on average higher using sulfuric acid (8.9%) than with HCl (5.8%), which had a higher recovery than ammonium nitrate. Tests were performed over a standard time interval for comparison between solvents, while a second set of testing was done to determine recovery rates of REEs and critical minerals under certain static and constant flow-through times to determine extraction in relation to time. Critical minerals had a higher recovery rate than the REEs across all tests, with a slightly higher recovery of light REEs over heavy REEs.

Conference presentation at TechConnect World Innovation Conference & Expo, Washington, D.C., June 13–15, 2022. The University of North Dakota (UND) through the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) and the Institute for Energy Studies teamed with the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, Microbeam Technologies Inc., the Kentucky Geological Survey (KGS), the North Dakota Geological Survey (NDGS), and the mining industry to execute a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) to obtain and characterize samples of U.S. domestic precombustion coal and coal-related materials with a minimum concentration of 300 parts per million (ppm) total rare-earth elements (TREEs) as the material is removed from the ground, with no processing other than drying.