The two goals of this study are to examine the impact of an early childhood teacher’s metacognition-driven, place-based science teaching professional development (PD) intervention and to explore the association between science teaching and environment quality and children’s self-regulated learning. A total of 110 children (Mage = 60 months) and 20 teachers from preschools and kindergartens in rural regions of Idaho, U.S., participated in this mixed-methods study between August 2022 and May 2023. Children’s and teachers’ pre-test and post-test data were collected using validated observation tools, surveys, and reflection journals. The results from repeated measures ANOVA and linear mixed regression show that there were statistically significant increases in children’s self-regulated learning scores and teachers’ science teaching efficacy and metacognitive knowledge, but not metacognitive regulation skill scores post-PD. Thematic analysis revealed evidence about children’s learning interests and inquiry skills, and that science activities supported children’s learning in other subjects and developmental domains (e.g., literacy, mathematics, and social-emotional skills). Our results indicate the potential for supporting young children’s self-regulated learning by training teachers to implement a developmentally appropriate, hands-on science curriculum that focuses on reflective thinking and a holistic understanding of science concepts and process skills.

Introduction: Science teaching belief-practice alignment is critical for ensuring high-quality, effective instruction that supports young children’s learning and engagement in science. The goal of this study is to examine the alignment between preschool and kindergarten teachers’ self-reported science teaching beliefs and observed practices before and after a science teaching professional development (PD) program and to explore whether the alignment is associated with children’s science learning outcomes. The research questions are: (1) Whether and to what extent do science teaching beliefs and practices align before and after the PD program? (2) Whether and to what extent are science teaching beliefs associated with children’s inquiry skills before and after the PD program?Methods: A total of 22 preschool and kindergarten teachers and 159 children (M_age = 47.78 months) from a Northwest state in the U.S. participated in a science teaching PD program. Teachers’ self-reported science teaching efficacy and observed teaching practices and children’s directly assessed science inquiry skills were measured before and after a one-year science PD program.Results: Multilevel regression results revealed that science teaching beliefs were not correlated with practice before the PD but were significantly aligned following its completion. Further, while teachers’ science teaching beliefs were not associated with children’s inquiry skills before the PD, a positive correlation emerged after the PD.Discussion: Our findings suggest the potential of targeted PD programs in fostering early childhood teachers’ science teaching belief-practice alignment. The results also indicate that teachers’ science teaching beliefs may not be a robust predictor of children’s science learning outcomes unless they are aligned with teaching practices.

In this study, we explored early childhood and elementary preservice teachers’ science and mathematics teaching efficacy to elucidate pathways to improve teacher preparation programs. Quantitative survey and open-ended responses data were collected from 180 preservice teachers from four universities in the United States. Multilevel ANCOVA and regression suggested that the number of science and mathematics courses taken by preservice teachers was associated with teaching efficacy beliefs, but not with outcome expectancy. Together with evidence from open-ended responses, we argue that besides science and mathematics content courses, preservice teachers also need pedagogical knowledge, hands-on teaching experiences, specialized training opportunities (e.g., workshops), and teaching-related resources (e.g., curriculum, technology) in order to increase the confidence in their potential impacts on students’ science and mathematics learning.