Background: The long‐term course of ulcerative colitis after a severe attack is poorly understood. Second‐line rescue therapy with cyclosporine or infliximab is effective for reducing short‐term colectomy but the impact in the long‐term is controversial.Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long‐term course of acute severe ulcerative colitis patients who avoid early colectomy either because of response to steroids or rescue therapy.Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study of adult patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis admitted to Italian inflammatory bowel disease referral centres from 2005 to 2017. All patients received intravenous steroids, and those who did not respond received either rescue therapy or colectomy. For patients who avoided early colectomy (within 3 months from the index attack), we recorded the date of colectomy, last follow‐up visit or death. The primary end‐point was long‐term colectomy rate in patients avoiding early colectomy.Results: From the included 372 patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis, 337 (90.6%) avoided early colectomy. From those, 60.5% were responsive to steroids and 39.5% to the rescue therapy. Median follow‐up was 44 months (interquartile range, 21–85). Colectomy‐free survival probability was 93.5%, 81.5% and 79.4% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Colectomy risk was higher among rescue therapy users than in steroid‐responders (log‐rank test, p = 0.02). At multivariate analysis response to steroids was independently associated with a lower risk of long‐term colectomy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.2–0.8), while previous exposure to antitumour necrosis factor‐α agents was associated with an increased risk (adjusted odds ratio = 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–5.7). Approximately 50% of patients required additional therapy or new hospitalisation within 5 years due to a recurrent flare. Death occurred in three patients (0.9%).Conclusions: Patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis avoiding early colectomy are at risk of long‐term colectomy, especially if previously exposed to antitumour necrosis factor‐α agents or if rescue therapy during the acute attack was required because of steroid refractoriness.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the most important causative agent of acute hepatitis in developing countries. The disease is usually characterized by a self-limiting, benign course. However, when particular conditions coexist (pregnancy, old age, pre-existing liver disease) it may run an unfavourable course. To date, 4 HEV genotypes have been described. Historically, in the Western world, HEV infection was considered a travel-related disease, however in the last 2 decades a great number of non-travel-related autochthonous cases have been described, more often related to genotype 3 or 4 and in the context of zoonosis. We report the case of an elderly Italian man with an acute fulminant HEV infection genotype 3e that developed in the context of pre-existing liver disease; this is the first case of an unfavourable outcome associated with subgenotype 3e. The potential pathogenicity of this subgenotype together with the influence of host-related risk factors are discussed.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving immunosuppressive drugs are at substantial risk of colectomy. We aimed to assess the risk of postoperative complications of tofacitinib exposure before colectomy in comparison with biologics. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients with UC who underwent total colectomy for medically refractory disease, exposed to tofacitinib or a biologic before surgery. Primary outcome was the occurrence of any complication within 30 (early) and 90 (late) days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of infections, sepsis, surgical site complications, venous thromboembolic events (VTE), hospital readmissions, and redo surgery within the same timepoints. RESULTS: Three hundred one patients (64 tofacitinib, 162 anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents, 54 vedolizumab, and 21 ustekinumab) were included. No significant differences were reported in any outcome, except for a higher rate of early VTE with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents (P = 0.047) and of late VTE with vedolizumab (P = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, drug class was not associated with a higher risk of any early and late complications. Urgent colectomy increased the risk of any early (odds ratio [OR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–3.48) complications, early hospital readmission (OR 4.79, 95% CI 1.12–20.58), and early redo surgery (OR 7.49, 95% CI 1.17–47.85). A high steroid dose increased the risk of any early complications (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.08–3.57), early surgical site complications (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.01–4.09), and early redo surgery (OR 7.52, 95% CI 1.42–39.82). Laparoscopic surgery decreased the risk of any early complications (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29–1.00), early infections (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18–0.85), and late hospital readmissions (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12–1.00). DISCUSSION: Preoperative tofacitinib treatment demonstrated a postoperative safety profile comparable with biologics in patients with UC undergoing colectomy.

Background and aims: Restructuring activities have been necessary during the lockdown phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Few data are available on the post‐lockdown phase in terms of health‐care procedures in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care, and no data are available specifically from IBD units. We aimed to investigate how IBD management was restructured during the lockdown phase, the impact of the restructuring on standards of care and how Italian IBD units have managed post‐lockdown activities.Methods: A web‐based online survey was conducted in two phases (April and June 2020) among the Italian Group for IBD affiliated units within the entire country. We investigated preventive measures, the possibility of continuing scheduled visits/procedures/therapies because of COVID‐19 and how units resumed activities in the post‐lockdown phase.Results: Forty‐two referral centres participated from all over Italy. During the COVID‐19 lockdown, 36% of first visits and 7% of follow‐up visits were regularly done, while >70% of follow‐up scheduled visits and 5% of first visits were done virtually. About 25% of scheduled endoscopies and bowel ultrasound scans were done. More than 80% of biological therapies were done as scheduled. Compared to the pre‐lockdown situation, 95% of centres modified management of outpatient activity, 93% of endoscopies, 59% of gastrointestinal ultrasounds and 33% of biological therapies. Resumption of activities after the lockdown phase may take three to six months to normalize. Virtual clinics, implementation of IBD pathways and facilities seem to be the main factors to improve care in the future.Conclusion: Italian IBD unit restructuring allowed quality standards of care during the COVID‐19 pandemic to be maintained. A return to normal appears to be feasible and achievable relatively quickly. Some approaches, such as virtual clinics and identified IBD pathways, represent a valid starting point to improve IBD care in the post‐COVID‐19 era.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is increased in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and surveillance needs to be tailored according to individual risk. The open issues include the role of the characteristics of IBD and CRC in determining the long-term outcome. These issues were assessed in our multicenter study, including a cohort of 56 IBD patients with incident CRC. The clinical and histopathological features of IBD patients and of CRC were recorded. Incident CRC in IBD occurred at a young age (≤40 years) in 25% of patients (median age 55.5 (22–76)). Mucinous signet-ring carcinoma was detected in 6 out of the 56 (10.7%) patients, including 4 with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and 2 with Crohn’s disease (CD). CRC was more frequently diagnosed by colonoscopy in UC (85.4% vs. 50%; p = 0.01) and by imaging in Crohn’s Disease CD (5.8% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.02). At onset, CRC-related symptoms occurred in 29 (51.9%) IBD patients. The time interval from the diagnosis of IBD to CRC was shorter in UC and CD patients with >40 years (p = 0.002; p = 0.01). CRC-related death occurred in 10 (29.4%) UC and in 6 (27.2%) CD patients (p = 0.89), with a short time interval from CRC to death (UC vs. CD: 6.5 (1–68) vs. 14.5 (8–40); p = 0.85; IBD: 12 months (1–68)). CRC occurring at a young age, a short time interval from the diagnosis of IBD to CRC-related death in the elderly, CRC-symptoms often mimicking IBD relapse and the observed high mortality rate may support the need of closer surveillance intervals in subgroups of patients.