Background— Peripheral blood CD34 + cells and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) increase in myocardial infarction and vascular injuries as a reflection of endothelial damage. Despite the occurrence of endothelial dysfunction in heart failure (HF), no data are available on EPC mobilization in this setting. We investigated the pattern of CD34 + cells and EPC mobilization during HF and their correlation with the severity and origin of the disease. Methods and Results— Peripheral blood CD34 + cells (n=91) and EPCs (n=41), assessed both as CD34 + cells coexpressing AC133 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 and as endothelial colony-forming units, were studied in HF patients (mean age 67±11 years) and 45 gender- and age-matched controls. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and its receptors (sTNFR-1 and sTNFR-2), VEGF, stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), and B-type natriuretic peptide were also measured. CD34 + cells, EPCs, TNF-α and receptors, VEGF, SDF-1, and B-type natriuretic peptide were increased in HF. CD34 + cells and EPCs were inversely related to functional class and to TNF-α, being decreased in New York Heart Association class IV compared with class I and II and controls. No role was found for the origin of the disease. Conclusions— CD34 + cells and EPC mobilization occurs in HF and shows a biphasic response, with elevation and depression in the early and advanced phases, respectively. This could be related to the myelosuppressive role of TNF-α.
Aims There is increasing evidence that stem cell (SC) mobilization to the heart and their differentiation into cardiac cells is a naturally occurring process. We sought to assess the safety and feasibility of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration in humans to enhance SC mobilization and left ventricle (LV) injury repair during myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and results Twenty patients with STEMI (mean age, 61±10 years), of whom 14 were submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention, were randomized to G-CSF (5 µg/kg/day s.c. for 4 consecutive days) or placebo. At entry and then at months 3 and 6, 99mTc-sestamibi gated-SPECT was performed to estimate extension of perfusion defect (PD) and LV function. The study drug was well tolerated and induced a significant increase of white blood count, CD34+ cells, and CD34+ cells coexpressing AC133 and VEGFR-2. At follow-up, treated and placebo groups did not differ for the angiographic coronary late loss and showed a similar pattern of PD recovery, whereas in the former at 6 months LVEF and especially LVEDV tended to be relatively higher (P=0.068) and lower (P=0.054), respectively. Conclusion G-CSF administration in acute MI patients was feasible and did not lead to any clinical or angiographic adverse events and resulted in CD34+ and CD34+AC133+VEGFR2+ cell mobilization.
In a phase II trial, we evaluated chlorambucil and rituximab (CLB‐R) as first‐line induction treatment with or without R as maintenance for elderly chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Treatment consisted of eight 28‐day cycles of CLB (8 mg/m2/day, days 1–7) and R (day 1 of cycle 3, 375 mg/m2; cycles 4–8, 500 mg/m2). Responders were randomized to 12 8‐week doses of R (375 mg/m2) or observation. As per intention‐to‐treat analysis, 82.4% (95% CI, 74.25–90.46%) of 85 patients achieved an overall response (OR), 16.5% a complete response (CR), 2.4% a CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. The OR was similar across Binet stages (A 86.4%, B 81.6%, and C 78.6%) and age categories (60–64 years, 92.3%; 65–69, 85.2%; 70–74, 75.0%; ≥75, 81.0%). CLB‐R was well tolerated. After a median follow‐up of 34.2 months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 34.7 months (95% CI, 33.1–39.5). TP53 abnormalities, complex karyotype, and low CD20 gene expression predicted lack of response; SF3B1 mutation and BIRC3 disruption low CR rates. IGHV mutations significantly predicted PFS. R maintenance tended towards a better PFS than observation and was safe and most beneficial for patients in partial response and for unmutated IGHV cases. CLB‐R represents a promising option for elderly CLL patients. Am. J. Hematol. 89:480–486, 2014.