Giuseppe Salfi

Dr. Giuseppe Salfi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 September 2023 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GSGiuseppe Salfi
Giuseppe Salfi
FCFederica Casiraghi
Federica Casiraghi
GRGiuseppe Remuzzi
Giuseppe Remuzzi
The pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the onset and the post-transplant recurrence of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are complex and remain yet to be fully elucidated. However, a growing body of evidence emphasizes the pivotal role of the immune system in both initiating and perpetuating the disease. Extensive investigations, encompassing both experimental models and patient studies, have implicated T cells, B cells, and complement as crucial actors in the pathogenesis of primary FSGS, with various molecules being proposed as potential “circulating factors” contributing to the disease and its recurrence post kidney-transplantation. In this review, we critically assessed the existing literature to identify essential pathways for a comprehensive characterization of the pathogenesis of FSGS. Recent discoveries have shed further light on the intricate interplay between these mechanisms. We present an overview of the current understanding of the engagement of distinct molecules and immune cells in FSGS pathogenesis while highlighting critical knowledge gaps that require attention. A thorough characterization of these intricate immune mechanisms holds the potential to identify noninvasive biomarkers that can accurately identify patients at high risk of post-transplant recurrence. Such knowledge can pave the way for the development of targeted and personalized therapeutic approaches in the management of FSGS.

3 May 2024 in European Urology Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMartino Pedrani
Martino Pedrani
GSGiuseppe Salfi
Giuseppe Salfi
Sara MerlerSara Merler
Sara Merler
ITIrene Testi
Irene Testi
MCMassimiliano Cani
Massimiliano Cani
RPRicardo Pereira-Mestre
Ricardo Pereira-Mestre
Mutations in the speckle-type POZ (SPOP) gene are frequently identified in prostate cancer (PC); yet, prognostic implications for affected patients remain unclear. Limited consensus exists regarding tailored treatments for SPOP-mutant (SPOPmut) PC. To elucidate the prognostic and predictive significance of SPOP mutations across distinct PC stages and treatments. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted up to January 29, 2024. The meta-analysis included studies comparing survival outcomes between SPOPmut and SPOP wild-type (SPOPwt) PC. From 669 records, 26 studies (including five abstracts) were analyzed. A meta-analysis of metastasis-free survival in localized (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.88; p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic PC (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.76; p < 0.01) showed a favorable prognosis for patients with SPOPmut PC. In metastatic settings, SPOP mutations correlated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy ± androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35-0.76, p < 0.01, and HR: 0.60, 95% CI:0.46-0.79, p < 0.01, respectively). In metastatic castration-resistant PC, only abiraterone provided improved PFS and OS to patients with SPOP mutations compared with patients with SPOPwt, but data were limited. SPOP mutations did not correlate with improved PFS (p = 0.80) or OS (p = 0.27) for docetaxel. Patients with SPOPmut PC seem to exhibit superior oncological outcomes compared with patients with SPOPwt. Tailored risk stratification and treatment approaches should be explored in such patients. Speckle-type POZ (SPOP) mutations could be a favorable prognostic factor in patients with prostate cancer (PC) and may also predict better progression-free and overall survival than treatment with hormonal agents. Therefore, less intensified treatments omitting chemotherapy for patients with SPOP-mutant PC should be explored in clinical trials.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMartino Pedrani
Martino Pedrani
JBJessica Barizzi
Jessica Barizzi
GSGiuseppe Salfi
Giuseppe Salfi
ANAlessandro Nepote
Alessandro Nepote
ITIrene Testi
Irene Testi
UVUrsula Vogl
Ursula Vogl
Aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC) is characterized by a molecular signature involving combined defects in TP53, RB1, and/or PTEN (AVPC-TSGs), identifiable through immunohistochemistry or genomic analysis. The reported prevalence of AVPC-TSG alterations varies widely, reflecting differences in assay sensitivity, treatment pressure, and disease stage evolution. Although robust clinical evidence is still emerging, the study of AVPC-TSG alterations in prostate cancer (PCa) is promising. Alterations in TP53, RB1, and PTEN, as well as the combined loss of AVPC-TSGs, may have significant implications for prognosis and treatment. These biomarkers might help predict responses to various therapies, including hormonal treatments, cytotoxic agents, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. Understanding the impact of these molecular alterations in patients with PCa is crucial for personalized management. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the emerging prognostic and predictive roles of AVPC-TSG alterations across PCa stages. Moreover, we discuss the implications of different methods used for detecting AVPC-TSG alterations and summarize factors influencing their prevalence. As our comprehension of the genomic landscape of PCa disease deepens, incorporating genomic profiling into clinical decision making will become increasingly important for improving patient outcomes.

10 January 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMassimiliano Cani
Massimiliano Cani
SESamantha Epistolio
Samantha Epistolio
GDGiulia Dazio
Giulia Dazio
MMMikol Modesti
Mikol Modesti
GSGiuseppe Salfi
Giuseppe Salfi
RPRicardo Pereira-Mestre
Ricardo Pereira-Mestre
Background: In 2019, the breakthrough of the coronavirus 2 disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), represented one of the major issues of our recent history. Different drugs have been tested to rapidly find effective anti-viral treatments and, among these, antiandrogens have been suggested to play a role in mediating SARS-CoV-2 infection. Considering the high heterogeneity of studies on this topic, we decided to review the current literature. Methods: We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was conducted on PUBMED and Medline. Only original articles published from March 2020 to 31 August 2023 investigating the possible protective role of antiandrogens were included. In vitro or preclinical studies and reports not in the English language were excluded. The main objective was to investigate how antiandrogens may interfere with COVID-19 outcomes. Results: Among 1755 records, we selected 31 studies, the majority of which consisted of retrospective clinical data collections and of randomized clinical trials during the first and second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: In conclusion, we can state that antiandrogens do not seem to protect individuals from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity and, thus, their use should not be encouraged in this field.

18 June 2025 in ESMO Rare Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MIMartina Imbimbo
Martina Imbimbo
GSGiuseppe Salfi
Giuseppe Salfi
MBMaxime Borgeaud
Maxime Borgeaud
MOM. Ottaviano
M. Ottaviano
PFPatrizia Froesch
Patrizia Froesch
AAAddeo Alfredo
Addeo Alfredo

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMartino Pedrani
Martino Pedrani
GSGiuseppe Salfi
Giuseppe Salfi
Sara MerlerSara Merler
Sara Merler
ITIrene Testi
Irene Testi
CCChiara Maria Agrippina Clerici
Chiara Maria Agrippina Clerici
RPRicardo Pereira-Mestre
Ricardo Pereira-Mestre
Alterations in aggressive-variant prostate cancer-associated tumor suppressor genes (AVPC-TSG: TP53, RB1, PTEN) are related with androgen insensitivity and aggressive disease. However, their prognostic and predictive role in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is unclear. This single-center retrospective study assesses the value of AVPC-TSG alterations in refining prognosis and predicting the response to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in mHSPC. We included 158 patients with genomic tumor sequencing undergoing treatment for mHSPC between 2013 and 2023. We compared patients with AVPC-TSGalt tumors (≥1 alteration in TP53, RB1, or PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway genes) to those with AVPC-TSGwt tumors (i.e., without alterations in AVPC-TSG). Cox analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). AVPC-TSGwt status was associated with improved PFS and OS in both univariate and multivariate (MV) analyses (MV PFS: HR 0.58, 95%CI: 0.38–0.89, p = 0.012; MV OS: HR 0.48, 95%CI: 0.26–0.91, p = 0.025). AVPC-TSGalt mHSPC patients seemed to derive no PFS benefit from ARPI addition (PFS: HR 1.13, 95%CI: 0.58–2.19, p = 0.721), while AVPC-TSGwt mHSPC patients did (PFS: HR 0.51, 95%CI: 0.28–0.93 p = 0.029). Integrating AVPC-TSG status with CHAARTED volume criteria, we identified three distinct subgroups: “good risk” (AVPC-TSGwt low volume), “intermediate risk” (either AVPC-TSGalt low volume or AVPC-TSGwt high volume), and “poor risk” (AVPC-TSGalt high volume) with median PFS of 46.8, 28.2, and 15.7 months, respectively. Only the “intermediate risk” subgroup seemed to derive PFS benefit from ARPI addition (HR 0.36, 95%CI: 0.19–0.70, p = 0.002). AVPC-TSG status assessment refines prognosis and may predict PFS benefits of ARPIs in mHSPC. AVPC-TSGalt mHSPC patients should be considered for clinical trials as they may not benefit from current standard approaches.