VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a recently recognized systemic autoinflammatory disease caused by somatic mutations in hematopoietic progenitor cells. This case series of four patients with VEXAS syndrome and comorbid myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) aims to describe clinical, imaging, and hematologic disease presentations as well as response to therapy. Four patients with VEXAS syndrome and MDS are described. A detailed analysis of imaging features, hemato-oncological presentation including bone marrow microscopy and clinical–rheumatological disease features and treatment outcomes is given. All patients were male; ages ranged between 64 and 81 years; all were diagnosed with MDS. CT imaging was available for three patients, all of whom exhibited pulmonary infiltrates of varying severity, resembling COVID-19 or hypersensitivity pneumonitis without traces of scarring. Bone marrow microscopy showed maturation-disordered erythropoiesis and pathognomonic vacuolation. Somatic mutation in the UBA1 codon 41 were found in all patients by next-generation sequencing. Therapy regimes included glucocorticoids, JAK1/2-inhibitors, nucleoside analogues, as well as IL-1 and IL-6 receptor antagonists. No fatalities occurred (observation period from symptom onset: 18–68 months). Given the potential underreporting of VEXAS syndrome, we highly recommend contemporary screening for UBA1 mutations in patients presenting with ambiguous signs of systemic autoinflammatory symptoms which persist over 18 months despite treatment. The emergence of cytopenia, especially macrocytic hyperchromic anemia, should prompt early testing for UBA1 mutations. Notably conspicuous, pulmonary alterations in CT imaging of patients with therapy-resistant systemic autoinflammatory symptoms should be discussed in interdisciplinary medical teams (Rheumatology, Hematology, Radiology and further specialist departments) to facilitate timely diagnosis during the clinical course of the disease.

Primary tumor sidedness (left vs. right) has prognostic and predictive impact on anti-EGFR agent efficacy and thus management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis evaluates the relevance of primary tumor location (PTL) in RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC patients, when dividing the colorectal frame into six segments. This pooled analysis, performed on a single-patient basis of five randomized first-line therapy trials, evaluates the impact of exact PTL classification on baseline characteristics, prognosis and prediction of anti-EGFR antibody efficacy by chi-square and log-rank tests, the Kaplan–Meier method, Cox and logistic regressions. The PTL was significantly associated with metastatic spread: liver (p = 0.001), lung (p = 0.047), peritoneal (p < 0.001) and lymph nodes (p = 0.048). A multivariate analysis indicated an impact on anti-EGFR agent efficacy in terms of overall survival depending on the exact primary tumor location: from detrimental in caecal (HR 2.63), rather neutral effects in the ascending colon (HR 1.24), right flexure/transverse colon (HR 0.99) and left flexure/descending colon (HR 0.91) to clear benefit in sigmoid (HR 0.71) and rectal (HR 0.58) primaries. Exact primary tumor location affects anti-EGFR antibody efficacy in a rather continuous than a dichotomous fashion in RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC patients. This perspective might help to support clinical decisions when anti-EGFR antibodies are considered.

Objectives: The use of liquid biopsies (LB) in patients with solid malignancies enables comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and has the potential to guide therapy stratification and support disease monitoring. To examine clinical uptake of LB in a real-world setting, LB implementation was analyzed at two German cancer centers (LMU Munich and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin) between 2017 and 2021, with focus on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.Methods: In this retrospective analysis, all patients who received a LB between January 2017 and December 2021 as part of routine clinical management were included. To provide adequate context, we collected disease characteristics and technical specifications of the LB methods applied. Additionally, we examined the concordance of RAS status in tumor tissue and LB. Finally, we discuss the potential of LB as a diagnostic tool to drive personalized treatment in CRC patients and how to implement LB in clinical routine.Results: In total, our cohort included 86 CRC patients and 161 LB conducted in these patients between 2017 and 2021. In 59 patients, comparison between tissue-based and liquid-based molecular diagnostics, revealed a divergence in 23 (39%) of the evaluable samples.Conclusion: Our real-world data analysis indicates that the possibilities of LB are not yet exploited in everyday clinical practice. Currently, the variety of methods and lack of standardization, as well as restricted reimbursement for liquid based CGP hinder the use of LB in clinical routine. To overcome these issues, prospective clinical trials are needed to provide evidence driving the implementation of LB into the management of CRC patients and to support their implementation into clinical guidelines.

Outcome is dismal in patients with advanced genitourinary (GU) cancers refractory to standard treatments. Molecular analyses and subsequent discussion of cases in specialized molecular tumor boards (MTBs) are increasingly incorporated into clinical management to facilitate personalized treatment. Data on this approach are lacking for GU malignancies. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with GU cancers discussed in the MTB at the Charité between 2016 and 2023. Ethics approval was obtained for prospective follow-up of patients after written informed consent and for retrospective data analysis. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) >6 months or a progression-free survival (PFS) ratio between molecularly matched therapy (MMT) and previous non-MMT >1.3. Outcome was assessed by the investigators. Among 126 identified MTB patients, most patients had a rare tumor type (n = 59), followed by adenocarcinoma of the prostate (n = 45), urothelial carcinoma (n = 17) and clear-cell renal carcinoma (n = 5). Molecular profiling included immunohistochemistry (n = 80), panel sequencing (n = 110) and/or whole-exome/-transcriptome sequencing (n = 21). Eleven patients died before the final MTB discussion. At least one treatment option for MMT was identified for 78/115 patients (68%). Twenty-five patients were treated with an MMT (22%), three of whom subsequently received a second MMT. Eighteen MMTs were given in an off-label setting and two within clinical trials. A clinical benefit was observed in 8/28 (28.6%) applied MMTs. A PFS-ratio >1.3 was achieved in eight patients. Among patients with rare entities discussed (n = 54), 42 patients had at least one MMT option (78%), with 19 patients receiving at least one MMT (35%). For a majority of GU cancer patients an MMT was identified and responses were seen in heavily pretreated patients. Additional controlled trials and integration of comprehensive molecular analyses and subsequent personalized therapy should be considered for patients with GU cancers, especially those with rare histologies.