The new slide roller burnishing (SRB) method has been developed to produce mirror-like surfaces. Unlike conventional roller burnishing (RB), SRB is implemented through a unique device that allows the axes of the deforming roller and the rotary workpiece to cross, resulting in a relative sliding velocity that can be controlled (in magnitude and direction) by varying the crossing angle. In the present work, the effect of SRB on the fatigue behavior of AISI 316 steel fatigue specimens was investigated by comparing it with conventional RB using the following basic correlation in surface engineering: finishing–surface integrity (SI)–operating behavior. To obtain a more representative picture of the comparison, we implemented each method (RB and SRB) with two combinations of governing factors—(A) a radius of the roller toroidal surface of 3 mm, a burnishing force of 250 N, and a feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev (RB-A and SRB-A), and (B) a radius of the roller toroidal surface of 4 mm, a burnishing force of 550 N, and a feed rate of 0.11 mm/rev (RB-B and SRB- B). Both SRB-A (a crossing angle of –45°) and SRB-B (a crossing angle of –30°) achieved mirror-finish surfaces. SRB-B lead to the greatest fatigue strength and, thus, the longest fatigue life among all tested processes. SRB-B created the deepest zone (>0.5 mm) with residual compressive macro-stresses and a clearly defined modified surface layer, whose thickness of more than 20 μm is about twice that created by the other three processes.

The article presents a new method called slide roller burnishing (SRB) for the cold working of cylindrical surfaces on machine tools implemented with a novel multi-functional device. The machined material is chromium–nickel austenitic stainless steel. The deforming element is a toroidal roller whose axis crosses that of the workpiece. As a result, a relative sliding velocity occurs in the contact zone between the roller and the machined surface. The sliding velocity vector is set using the burnishing device. The theoretical background of SRB is presented. When the two axes are parallel, the well-known roller burnishing (RB) method is implemented. Thus, RB is a special case of SRB. Both processes are realized using the multi-functional burnishing device. The RB process was studied experimentally and optimized according to three criteria, based on the relationship between the surface integrity and operating behavior of the respective component, to achieve three processes: smoothing, hardening, and mixed burnishing. Using the optimal RB parameters obtained, the dependence of the results of SRB on the crossing angle was investigated and optimized. A comparative analysis was performed between the optimized RB and SRB processes (respectively for their three variants: smoothing, hardening, and mixed) based on geometrical and physical–mechanical characteristics of the surface integrity. The main advantage of the SRB is that it provides smaller height roughness parameters (improvement by 42%) and a higher surface microhardness (improvement by 7%) than RB.

This study aims to evaluate the influence of lubrication and cooling conditions in the diamond burnishing (DB) process on the surface integrity and fatigue limit of chromium–nickel austenitic stainless steels (CNASSs) and, on this basis, identify a cost-effective and sustainable DB process. Evidence was presented that DB of CNASS performed without lubricating cooling liquid satisfies the requirements for a sustainable process: the three key sustainability dimensions (environmental, economic, and social) are satisfied, and the cost/quality ratio is favorable. DB was implemented with the same values of the main governing factors; however, four different lubrication and cooling conditions were applied: (1) flood lubrication (process F); (2) dry without cooling (process D); (3) dry with air cooling at a temperature of −19 °C (process A); and (4) dry with nitrogen cooling at a temperature of −31 °C (process N). Conditions A and N were realized via a device based on the principle of vortex tubes. All four DB processes provide mirror-finished surfaces with Ra roughness parameter values from 0.041 to 0.049 μm, zones with residual compressive stresses deeper than 0.5 mm, and increases in the specimens’ fatigue limit (as determined by the accelerated Locati’s method) compared to turning and polishing. Processes F and D produce the highest microhardness on the surface and at depth. The process D introduces maximum compressive residual axial and hoop stresses in the surface layer. The dry DB processes (D, A, and N) form a submicrocrystalline structure with high atomic density, which is most strongly developed under process D. When high fatigue strength is required, DB with air cooling should be chosen, as it provides a more favorable cost/quality ratio, whereas dry DB without cooling is the most suitable choice for applications that require increased wear resistance.

Chromium–nickel austenitic stainless steels are widely used in various industries after their initial hardness and strength are increased. Apart from low-temperature thermal–chemical diffusion, the mechanical properties can be improved by surface cold working (SCW). A cheap and reliable form of static SCW is diamond burnishing (DB), which drastically improves the surface integrity (SI) and hence the operational behavior of the processed component. To be maximally effective, the DB parameters must be optimized according to a relevant criterion, depending on the desired effect. For high fatigue strength and/or high wear resistance, complex experimental tests are necessary, which require significant time and financial resources. This study presents a cost-effective optimization approach based on the DB process–SI–operating behavior correlations. Using these correlations, in addition to the correlations between appropriately selected SI characteristics, the proposed approach relies on the control of only three easy-to-measure roughness parameters, namely the arithmetic average roughness, skewness, and kurtosis, which, in turn, depend on the governing factors of the DB process.

The main goal of this study is to develop an optimized sustainable combined process, including sequential dry hard turning and dry smoothing diamond burnishing (DB), to improve the surface integrity (SI) and fatigue limit of heat-treated 42CrMo4 steel shafts and axles. A holistic approach was used based on a two-stage study: (1) optimization of dry hard turning under an average roughness Ra criterion and (2) selection of a suitable dry DB from three alternative DB processes, implemented with burnishing forces of 50, 100, and 150 N. With increasing burnishing force, the average roughness of Ra decreases, the microhardness increases, and the surface axial residual stresses increase in absolute value. However, the fatigue limit decreases, and at burnishing forces of 100 and 150 N, the fatigue limit is smaller than that obtained via the previous turning. The sustainable combined process achieves greater SI than consecutively applied conventional turning and DB under flood lubrication conditions. Dry DB at a force of 50 N increases the rotating bending fatigue limit by 20 MPa and the fatigue life by a factor of more than 70 compared to the previous dry turning.

There is a lack of information in the literature on the influence of technological heredity on surface integrity characteristics after diamond burnishing (DB). The present study fills this gap. Here, we present the effects of DB on the roughness parameters and surface microhardness of heat-treated C45 steel under conditions of changing initial roughness (Ra^init) due to wear on the cutting insert in the previous turning. The aim was to quantitatively assess the ability of DB to maintain sustainable surface integrity characteristics. We found that the service life of the cutting insert up to complete wear or fracture when operating at an optimal feed rate and cutting velocity was 163 min, at which point the roughness changed unevenly from an average roughness (Ra) value of 0.38 to 1.31 μm and an average height of the profile microroughness (Rz) value of 2.21 to 6.13 μm. Under conditions of an artificially created Ra^init (through different combinations of feed rate and cutting velocity) of 0.308 to 10.688 μm, DB provided Ra values in the range of 0.042 to 0.316 μm, with the surface microhardness varying from 461 to 568 HV. Stable Ra values were maintained from 0.042 μm to 0.089 μm, after which the Ra^init increased to 3.379 μm. Under production conditions, where the previous turning was performed at an optimal feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev and a cutting velocity of 180 m/min, DB provided a stable Ra of ≤0.059 μm of a resulting mirror-like surface during the first 90 min of operation of a new (unused) cutting insert, after which the Ra values increased linearly from 0.059 to 0.133 μm in the 150th minute. After 30 min of operation, until the cutting insert was completely worn, the microhardness after DB varied from 676 to 795 HV, the high surface microhardness resulting from a complex process of surface thermo-mechanical strengthening (including strain and transformation hardening) in the previous turning due to wear on the cutting insert.