Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Following an ischemic insult, cells undergo endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which increases the ER’s protein-folding and degradative capacities and blocks the global synthesis of proteins by phosphorylating the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha (eIF2α). Phosphorylation of eIF2α is directly related to the dynamics of stress granules (SGs), which are membraneless organelles composed of RNA-binding proteins and mRNA. SGs play a critical role in mRNA metabolism and translational control. Other translation factors are also linked to cellular pathways, including SG dynamics following a stroke. Because the formation of SGs is closely connected to mRNA translation, it is interesting to study the relationship between SG dynamics and cellular outcome in cases of ischemic damage. Therefore, in this review, we focus on the role of SG dynamics during cerebral ischemia.

Sham control groups are essential in experimental animal studies to reduce the influence of surgical intervention. The intraluminal filament procedure is one of the most common models of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) used in the study of brain ischemia. However, a sham group is usually not included in the experimental design of these studies. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relevance of the sham group by analyzing and comparing the brain protein profiles of the sham and MCAO groups. In the sham group, 98 dysregulated proteins were detected, compared to 171 in the ischemic group. Moreover, a comparative study of protein profiles revealed the existence of a pool of 57 proteins that appeared to be dysregulated in both sham and ischemic animals. These results indicated that the surgical procedure required for the intraluminal occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) induces changes in brain protein expression that are not associated with ischemic lesions. This study highlights the importance of including sham control groups in the experimental design, to ensure that surgical intervention does not affect the therapeutic target under study.

Background: Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) remains the standard thrombolytic treatment for ischemic stroke. Different types of nanoparticles have emerged as promising tools to improve the benefits and decrease the drawbacks of this therapy. Among them, cell membrane-derived (CMD) nanomedicines have gained special interest due to their capability to increase the half-life of particles in blood, biocompatibility, and thrombus targeting. In order to update and evaluate the efficacy of these nanosystems, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected in vivo preclinical studies. Methods: Preclinical in vivo studies in ischemic stroke models have been identified through a search in the Pubmed database. We included studies of rtPA-nanoparticles, which assessed infarct volume and/or neurological improvement. Nanosystems were compared with free (non-encapsulated) rtPA treatment. Standardized mean differences were computed and pooled to estimate effect sizes for lesion volumes and neurological scores. Subgroup analyses by the risk of bias, type of nanoparticle, and time of administration were also performed. Results: A total of 18 publications were included in the meta-analysis. This was based on defined search inclusion criteria. Our analysis revealed that rtPA-nanoparticles improved both lesion volume and neurological scores compared with the free rtPA treatment. Moreover, CMD nanomedicines showed better evolution of infarct volume compared to the other nanoparticles. Funnel plots of lesion volume exhibited asymmetry and publication bias. Heterogeneity was generally high, and the funnel plot and Egger test showed some evidence of publication bias that did not achieve statistical significance in the trim-and-fill analysis. Conclusions: rtPA-encapsulating nanosystems were shown to decrease infarct volume and improve neurological scales compared to the standard treatment, and CMD nanomedicines had the greatest beneficial effect.

Glutamate grabbers, such as glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT), have been proposed to prevent excitotoxicity secondary to high glutamate levels in stroke patients. However, the efficacy of blood glutamate grabbing by GOT could be dependent on the extent and severity of the disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Our purpose was to analyze the relationship between GOT and glutamate concentration with the patient’s functional status differentially according to BBB serum markers (soluble tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK) and leukoaraiosis based on neuroimaging). This retrospective observational study includes 906 ischemic stroke patients. We studied the presence of leukoaraiosis and the serum levels of glutamate, GOT, and sTWEAK in blood samples. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. A significant negative correlation between GOT and glutamate levels at admission was shown in those patients with sTWEAK levels > 2900 pg/mL (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: −0.249; p < 0.0001). This correlation was also observed in patients with and without leukoaraiosis (Pearson’s correlation coefficients: −0.299; p < 0.001 vs. −0.116; p = 0.024). The logistic regression model confirmed the association of higher levels of GOT with lower odds of poor outcome at 3 months when sTWEAK levels were >2900 pg/mL (OR: 0.41; CI 95%: 0.28–0.68; p < 0.0001) or with leukoaraiosis (OR: 0.75; CI 95%: 0.69–0.82; p < 0.0001). GOT levels are associated with glutamate levels and functional outcomes at 3 months, but only in those patients with leukoaraiosis and elevated sTWEAK levels. Consequently, therapies targeting glutamate grabbing might be more effective in patients with BBB dysfunction.