Due to varying descriptions and terminology of fascias of the neck, medical advice relying on this basic knowledge is insufficient. Our goal was to provide a precise anatomical description of cervical fascias and spaces with special focus on the intercarotid fascia, or the alar fascia. One hundred bodies donated to science embalmed with Thiel's method were investigated, cervical fascias were dissected layer by layer, and the results were documented by photography, with a focus on the intercarotid fascia. In addition, we performed a review of recent literature concerning cervical surgical interventions, radiological diagnostic pathways, and basic anatomical works focusing on core information on anatomical relations of cervical fascias and spaces. In another 10 bodies donated to science, the spaces of the neck were injected with coloured latex under ultrasound guidance, dissected, and documented by photography. The intercarotid fascia was a constantly developed connective tissue interconnecting the carotid sheath of both sides. In 52 of 100 specimens (52%) it crossed to the opposite side without any fusion to the ventrally situated visceral fascia. Fusion with the visceral fascia was found in 48%, either at the lateral border of the pharynx or on its dorsal side. The results of our dissections strengthen the precise description of the cervical fascias provided by Grodinsky and Holyoke in 1938. Spaces can be confirmed as described by Hafferl in 1969. The international anatomical and ENT societies should codify a unified anatomical terminology of the cervical spaces and fascias to prevent varying interpretations in the future.

Interference with the function of the genitofemoral nerve (GFN) and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) represents a significant complication of lumbar sympathetic blocks (LSBs). The nerve topography of the lumbar sympathetic trunk (LST) was investigated to find a possible morphological reason for this. A total of 118 cadavers embalmed by Thiel's method were investigated. The nerves were dissected from their innervation area to their paravertebral origins. Distances of the GFN and the LFCN to the LST were measured at levels L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5, which are the most common levels for LSB. Two hundred and thirteen sides were assessable for the GFN and 151 sides for the LFCN. In 186 cases, the whole GFN (in 20 cases, its femoral branch only) approached the medial margin of the psoas major (PM) and passed the LST laterally at the level of L3/4 and a distance of 0–28 mm (mean distance 8.5 mm; sd 6.7 mm) and ran dorsally between the PM and the vertebral body of L3, reaching the intervertebral foramen L2/3. In three cases, the GFN fused with the LFCN. In 55 cases, the GFN–LST distance was 0–13 mm at L4/5 and in 19 cases, 9–19 mm at L2/3. The LFCN approached the lateral margin of the PM and entered the intervertebral foramen at L2/3 in 141 cases. There is a higher risk of LSB affecting the GFN at L3/4 or L4/5 during neurolysis of the LST due to its topography. The LFCN rarely shows a strong relation to the LST and only when fused with the GFN.

Background Degenerative processes of the lumbar spine may change the position of the sympathetic trunk which might cause failure of sympathetic blocks owing to inadequate distribution of local anaesthetic. Methods The retroperitoneal spaces of 56 cadavers [24 males and 32 females; 79 (10) yr] embalmed with Thiel's method were investigated by dissection. The course of the lumbar sympathetic trunk (LST) was documented from the diaphragmatic level to the linea terminalis. Topography of the large vessels and the psoas muscle was documented. In the case of spondylophytes, the location or direction of displacement of the trunk was regarded with special interest. Results The LST entered the retroperitoneal space at the level of the vertebral body of L2 in 70 of the 112 sides and showed the most consistent relationship with the medial margin of the psoas muscle at intervertebral disc level L2/3. On 11 spines with spondylophytes, the sympathetic trunk was dislocated to the most ventrolateral point of the spondylophyte in 12 cases, in six cases dorsolaterally, and in one case ventromedially. The more the sympathetic chain departed at the vertebral body level, the more the body developed a concavity by loss of height. Conclusions Spondylophytes influenced the location of the LST and the distribution of the local anaesthetic. The local anaesthetic should wash around the spondylophyte to reach all possible locations of the chain. The medial margin of the psoas muscle was confirmed to be a consistent reference point at intervertebral disc level L2/3.

Anterior fixation of the pelvis using subcutaneous supra-acetabular pedicle screw internal fixation (INFIX) has proven to be a useful tool by avoiding the downsides of external fixation in patients where open fixation is not suited. The purpose of this study was to find a rod-to-bone distance for the INFIX that allows for minimal hazard to the inguinal neuro-vascular structures and, at the same time, as little as possible interference with the soft tissues of the proximal thigh when the patient is sitting. An INFIX was applied to 10 soft-embalmed cadaver pelvises with three different rod-to-bone distances. With each configuration, the relations of the rod to the neuro-vascular and the muscular surroundings were measured in supine and sitting position. Except for the femoral artery, vein and nerve, all investigated anatomical structures of the groin were under compression with a rod-to-bone distance of 1cm. With a rod-to-bone distance of 2cm most of the anatomical structures were safe in supine position, although less than with 3cm. With hip flexion some structures got under compression, especially the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN, 80%) and the anterior cutaneous branches of the femoral nerve (ACBFN, 35%). With a rod-to-bone distance of 3cm almost all anatomical structures were safe in supine position, while with hip flexion most superficial structures of the proximal thigh got under compression, especially the LFCN (75%) and the ACBFN (60%). Aiming for a rod-to-bone distance of 2cm is the safest way with regard to compression of the femoral neuro-vascular bundle and at the same time leads to the least compression of more superficial structures like the LFCN, the ACBFN, or the sartorius and the rectus femoris muscles in sitting position.