Daniela Coluccia

Prof. Daniela Coluccia


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 August 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDaniela Coluccia
Daniela Coluccia
SFSTEFANO FONTANA
STEFANO FONTANA
SSSilvia Solimene
Silvia Solimene
We propose to investigate the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and institutional/environmental factors among a sample of European listed companies. We find that, by using several traditional explicative variables, institutional factors affect the level of CSR disclosure, in a context where the EU Commission has been paying growing attention to social and environmental accountability of listed companies (see the EU Dir. 95/2014). Our findings are further supported by multivariate regression, where ESG score (measure of CSR disclosure) is regressed on nine variables which represent the expression of institutional factors. By looking at the institutional determinants of CSR disclosure, we are seeking to pose a challenge for future research agenda, in order to understand whether CSR does actually reflect an effective commitment of firms to accounting practices and rules, as a form of social behavior, or whether it is just a tool to manage stakeholders’ perception and to comply with regulation.

6 November 2015 in Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rosa LombardiRosa Lombardi
Rosa Lombardi
DCDaniela Coluccia
Daniela Coluccia
GRGiuseppe Russo
Giuseppe Russo
SSSilvia Solimene
Silvia Solimene

30 June 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSilvia Solimene
Silvia Solimene
DCDaniela Coluccia
Daniela Coluccia
Alessandro BernardoAlessandro Bernardo
Alessandro Bernardo
This paper aims to define and measure the environmental impacts associated with three distinct industry techniques used in the production of fresh tomatoes, from planting to harvesting. A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is conducted to evaluate the environmental performance of producing one kilogram of fresh processing tomatoes. The study includes three Italian companies representing different Business Models: standard production, integrated production, and precision farming. The impact evaluation method used is ReCiPe, at both midpoint and endpoint levels. The results reveal that the adoption of advanced technology, such as precision farming, in managing the agricultural production of fresh tomatoes leads to a significant reduction in environmental impacts across all categories analyzed. Interestingly, the largest contribution to climate-changing gases comes from the use of fertilizers. Precision farming demonstrates a remarkable reduction of CO2 emissions by 52% compared to integrated production and 67% compared to standard production. This analysis provides valuable insights for managers and policymakers in developing strategies for large-scale, sustainable production using innovative techniques. The main contribution of this study lies in comparing the performance of three different Business Models employed in Italian fresh tomato production.

1 June 2018 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
DCDaniela Coluccia
Daniela Coluccia
SFSTEFANO FONTANA
STEFANO FONTANA
SSSilvia Solimene
Silvia Solimene
We propose to investigate the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and institutional/environmental factors among a sample of European listed companies. We find that, controlling by several traditional explicative variables, institutional factors affect the level of CSR disclosure, in a context where the EU Commission has been paying growing attention to social and environmental accountability by listed companies (see the EU Dir. 95/2014). Our findings are further supported by multivariate regression where ESG score (measure of CSR disclosure) is regressed on nine variables expression of institutional factors. By looking at the institutional determinants of CSR disclosure, we are seeking to put the challenge for the future research agenda, in order to understand if CSR does reflect effective commitment of firms to accounting practices and rules, in social behavior manner, or it is just a tool to manage stakeholders’ perception and to comply with regulation.


1 January 2017 in International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing
Verified
Closed access
DCDaniela Coluccia
Daniela Coluccia
SFSTEFANO FONTANA
STEFANO FONTANA
SSSilvia Solimene
Silvia Solimene