Miguel Angel Carretero

Dr. Miguel Angel Carretero

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 June 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMargarida Cardoso-Moreira
Margarida Cardoso-Moreira
JHJean Halbert
Jean Halbert
DVDelphine Valloton
Delphine Valloton
BVBritta Velten
Britta Velten
CCChunyan Chen
Chunyan Chen
HKHenrik Kaessmann
Henrik Kaessmann
The evolution of gene expression in mammalian organ development remains largely uncharacterized. Here we report the transcriptomes of seven organs (cerebrum, cerebellum, heart, kidney, liver, ovary and testis) across developmental time points from early organogenesis to adulthood for human, rhesus macaque, mouse, rat, rabbit, opossum and chicken. Comparisons of gene expression patterns identified correspondences of developmental stages across species, and differences in the timing of key events during the development of the gonads. We found that the breadth of gene expression and the extent of purifying selection gradually decrease during development, whereas the amount of positive selection and expression of new genes increase. We identified differences in the temporal trajectories of expression of individual genes across species, with brain tissues showing the smallest percentage of trajectory changes, and the liver and testis showing the largest. Our work provides a resource of developmental transcriptomes of seven organs across seven species, and comparative analyses that characterize the development and evolution of mammalian organs.

29 August 2014 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMiguel Angel Carretero
Miguel Angel Carretero
CRCarl-Johan Rubin
Carl-Johan Rubin
FPFederica Di Palma
Federica Di Palma
FAFrank W. Albert
Frank W. Albert
JAJessica Alföldi
Jessica Alföldi
LALeif Andersson
Leif Andersson
Rabbits softly swept to domestication: When people domesticate animals, they select for tameness and tolerance of humans. What else do they look for? To identify the selective pressures that led to rabbit domestication, Carneiro et al. sequenced a domestic rabbit genome and compared it to that of its wild brethren (see the Perspective by Lohmueller). Domestication did not involve a single gene changing, but rather many gene alleles changing in frequency between tame and domestic rabbits, known as a soft selective sweep. Many of these alleles have changes that may affect brain development, supporting the idea that tameness involves changes at multiple loci. Science , this issue p. 1074 ; see also p. 1000

28 February 2019 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PAPedro Andrade
Pedro Andrade
CPCatarina Pinho
Catarina Pinho
GLGuillem Pérez i de Lanuza
Guillem Pérez i de Lanuza
SASandra Afonso
Sandra Afonso
JBJindřich Brejcha
Jindřich Brejcha
MCMiguel Angel Carretero
Miguel Angel Carretero
Reptiles use pterin and carotenoid pigments to produce yellow, orange, and red colors. These conspicuous colors serve a diversity of signaling functions, but their molecular basis remains unresolved. Here, we show that the genomes of sympatric color morphs of the European common wall lizard ( Podarcis muralis ), which differ in orange and yellow pigmentation and in their ecology and behavior, are virtually undifferentiated. Genetic differences are restricted to two small regulatory regions near genes associated with pterin [ sepiapterin reductase ( SPR )] and carotenoid [ beta-carotene oxygenase 2 ( BCO2 )] metabolism, demonstrating that a core gene in the housekeeping pathway of pterin biosynthesis has been coopted for bright coloration in reptiles and indicating that these loci exert pleiotropic effects on other aspects of physiology. Pigmentation differences are explained by extremely divergent alleles, and haplotype analysis revealed abundant transspecific allele sharing with other lacertids exhibiting color polymorphisms. The evolution of these conspicuous color ornaments is the result of ancient genetic variation and cross-species hybridization.

1 June 2016 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RLRicardo Jorge Lopes
Ricardo Jorge Lopes
JJJames D. Johnson
James D. Johnson
MTMatthew B. Toomey
Matthew B. Toomey
MFMafalda S. Ferreira
Mafalda S. Ferreira
PAPedro Miguel Araújo
Pedro Miguel Araújo
MCMiguel Angel Carretero
Miguel Angel Carretero

11 April 2013 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPhilippe Gayral
Philippe Gayral
JMJosé Melo-Ferreira
José Melo-Ferreira
SGSylvain Glémin
Sylvain Glémin
NBNicolas Bierne
Nicolas Bierne
MCMiguel Angel Carretero
Miguel Angel Carretero
NGNicolas Galtier
Nicolas Galtier
In animals, the population genomic literature is dominated by two taxa, namely mammals and drosophilids, in which fully sequenced, well-annotated genomes have been available for years. Data from other metazoan phyla are scarce, probably because the vast majority of living species still lack a closely related reference genome. Here we achieve de novo, reference-free population genomic analysis from wild samples in five non-model animal species, based on next-generation sequencing transcriptome data. We introduce a pipe-line for cDNA assembly, read mapping, SNP/genotype calling, and data cleaning, with specific focus on the issue of hidden paralogy detection. In two species for which a reference genome is available, similar results were obtained whether the reference was used or not, demonstrating the robustness of our de novo inferences. The population genomic profile of a hare, a turtle, an oyster, a tunicate, and a termite were found to be intermediate between those of human and Drosophila, indicating that the discordant genomic diversity patterns that have been reported between these two species do not reflect a generalized vertebrate versus invertebrate gap. The genomic average diversity was generally higher in invertebrates than in vertebrates (with the notable exception of termite), in agreement with the notion that population size tends to be larger in the former than in the latter. The non-synonymous to synonymous ratio, however, did not differ significantly between vertebrates and invertebrates, even though it was negatively correlated with genetic diversity within each of the two groups. This study opens promising perspective regarding genome-wide population analyses of non-model organisms and the influence of population size on non-synonymous versus synonymous diversity. The analysis of genomic variation between individuals of a given species has so far been restricted to a small number of model organisms, such as human and fruitfly, for which a fully sequenced, well-annotated reference genome was available. Here we show that, thanks to next-generation high-throughput sequencing technologies and appropriate genotype-calling methods, de novo population genomic analysis is possible in absence of a reference genome. We characterize the genomic level of neutral and selected polymorphism in five non-model animal species, two vertebrates and three invertebrates, paying particular attention to the treatment of multi-copy genes. The analyses demonstrate the influence of population size on genetic diversity in animals, the two vertebrates (hare, turtle) and the social insect (termite) being less polymorphic than the two marine invertebrates (oyster, tunicate) in our sample. Interestingly, genomic indicators of the efficiency of natural selection, both purifying and adaptive, did not vary in a simple, predictable way across organisms. These results prove the value of a diversified sampling of species when it comes to understand the determinants of genome evolutionary dynamics.

20 December 2005 in Journal of Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SRSara Rodrigues Passos Rocha
Sara Rodrigues Passos Rocha
MCMiguel Angel Carretero
Miguel Angel Carretero
MVMiguel Vences
Miguel Vences
FGFrank Glaw
Frank Glaw
DHD. James Harris
D. James Harris