Caixia Wang

Dr. Caixia Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2020 in Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCunte Chen
Cunte Chen
CLChaofeng Liang
Chaofeng Liang
SWShunqing Wang
Shunqing Wang
CCChi Leong Chio
Chi Leong Chio
YZYuping Zhang
Yuping Zhang
YLYangqiu Li
Yangqiu Li
Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for solid tumors had significantly improved overall survival. This type of therapy is still not available for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One major issue is the lack of knowledge for the expression patterns of immune checkpoints (IC) in AML. In this study, we first explored the prognostic value of ICs for AML patients by analyzing RNA-seq and mutation data from 176 AML patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We further validated the results of the database analysis by analyzing bone marrow (BM) samples from 62 patients with de novo AML. Both TCGA data and validation results indicated that high expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 was associated with poor overall survival (OS) in AML patients. In addition, increased co-expression of PD-1/CTLA-4 or PD-L2/CTLA-4 correlated with poor OS in AML patients (3-year OS: TGCA data 30% vs 0% and 20% vs 0%, validation group 57% vs 31% and 57% vs 33%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Moreover, co-expression of PD-1/PD-L1, PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2, and PD-1/LAG-3 was found to correlate with poor OS in AML patients with FLT3mut, RUNX1mut, and TET2mut, respectively. In conclusion, high expression of ICs in the BM leukemia cells of AML patients correlated with poor outcome. The co-expression patterns of PD-1/CTLA-4, PD-L2/CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2, and PD-1/LAG-3 might be potential immune biomarkers for designing novel AML therapy.

1 January 2019 in Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CCCun-Te Chen
Cun-Te Chen
PWPei-Pei Wang
Pei-Pei Wang
WMWen-Jian Mo
Wen-Jian Mo
YZYu-Ping Zhang
Yu-Ping Zhang
WZWei Zhou
Wei Zhou
CWCaixia Wang
Caixia Wang
Background: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are over 200 nt in length, have a key role in tumorigenesis and disease progression. To explore the role of prognostic lncRNAs in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the expression profiles of lncRNAs and mRNAs in AML were analyzed.

9 July 2019 in Oncology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCunte Chen
Cunte Chen
PWPeipei Wang
Peipei Wang
WMWenjian Mo
Wenjian Mo
YZYuping Zhang
Yuping Zhang
WZWei Zhou
Wei Zhou
CWCaixia Wang
Caixia Wang
The aim of the present study was to examine the expression and clinical significance of long non‑coding RNA (lncRNA)‑CCDC26 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and to investigate the potential functions of CCDC26. The Gene Expression Omnibus database and reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis were used to detect the expression levels of CCDC26 in patients with AML and healthy volunteers. Clinical data for 93 patients with AML were collected to analyze the clinical significance of CCDC26. Weighted gene co‑expression network analysis (WGCNA), a protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were used to examine the functions of CCDC26. The expression levels of CCDC26 in the initially diagnosed and relapsed patients with AML were significantly upregulated compared with the control group. The upregulated expression level of CCDC26 in patients with AML was significantly associated with age, anemia, risk stratification and remission. Furthermore, patients with a high CCDC26 expression level had a poorer overall survival (P=0.0105). In addition, the area under the curve (AUC)1year and AUC2year of CCDC26 for overall survival were 0.722 and 0.686, respectively. WGCNA, PPI network and KEGG pathway analysis revealed that CCDC26 was involved in the regulation of a number of biological processes. lncRNA‑CCDC26 may serve as a novel biomarker for monitoring the progression and predicting the clinical outcome of AML.

18 April 2023 in Annals of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PWPeipei Wang
Peipei Wang
QCQinghua Cai
Qinghua Cai
QLQingqin Long
Qingqin Long
SPShiyi Pan
Shiyi Pan
WZWei Zhou
Wei Zhou
CCCunte Chen
Cunte Chen
High expression of immune checkpoints (ICs) and senescence molecules (SMs) contributes to T cell dysfunction, tumor escape, and progression, but systematic evaluation of them in co-expression patte...

27 January 2023 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XYXibao Yu
Xibao Yu
CCCunte Chen
Cunte Chen
YHYanyun Hu
Yanyun Hu
KLKehan Li
Kehan Li
YZYikai Zhang
Yikai Zhang
CZChengwu Zeng
Chengwu Zeng
Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive heterogeneous hematological malignancy with remarkably heterogeneous outcomes. This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers for AML risk stratification via analysis of gene expression profiles.Methods: RNA sequencing data from 167 adult AML patients in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were obtained for overall survival (OS) analysis, and 52 bone marrow (BM) samples from our clinical center were used for validation. Additionally, siRNA was used to investigate the role of prognostic genes in the apoptosis and proliferation of AML cells.Results: Co‐expression of 103 long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and mRNAs in the red module that were positively correlated with European Leukemia Network (ELN) risk stratification and age was identified by weighted gene co‐expression network analysis (WGCNA). After screening by uni‐ and multivariate Cox regression, Kaplan–Meier survival, and protein–protein interaction analysis, four genes including the lncRNA LOC541471, GDAP1, SOD1, and STK25 were incorporated into calculating a risk score from coefficients of the multivariate Cox regression model. Notably, GDAP1 expression was the greatest contributor to OS among the four genes. Interestingly, the risk score, ELN risk stratification, and age were independent prognostic factors for AML patients, and a nomogram model constructed with these factors could illustrate and personalize the 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year OS rates of AML patients. The calibration and time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) suggested that the nomogram had a good predictive performance. Furthermore, new risk stratification was developed for AML patients based on the nomogram model. Importantly, knockdown of LOC541471, GDPA1, SOD1, or STK25 promoted apoptosis and inhibited the proliferation of THP‐1 cells compared to controls.Conclusions: High expression of LOC541471, GDAP1, SOD1, and STK25 may be biomarkers for risk stratification of AML patients, which may provide novel insight into evaluating prognosis, monitoring progression, and designing combinational targeted therapies.

17 January 2024 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPeihong Wang
Peihong Wang
YZYvyin Zhang
Yvyin Zhang
RXRufang Xiang
Rufang Xiang
JYJie Yang
Jie Yang
YXYanli Xu
Yanli Xu
SWShunqing Wang
Shunqing Wang
FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations are one of the most prevalent somatic alterations associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The clinically approved FLT3 kinase inhibitors gilteritinib and quizartinib improve the survival of patients with AML with FLT3-ITD mutations, but their long-term efficacy is limited by acquisition of secondary drug-resistant mutations. In this study, we conducted virtual screening of a library of 60,411 small molecules and identified foretinib as a potent FLT3 inhibitor. An integrated analysis of the BeatAML database showed that foretinib had a lower IC50 value than other existing FLT3 inhibitors in patients with FLT3-ITD AML. Foretinib directly bound to FLT3 and effectively inhibited FLT3 signaling. Foretinib potently inhibited proliferation and promoted apoptosis in human AML cell lines and primary AML cells with FLT3-ITD mutations. Foretinib also significantly extended the survival of mice bearing cell-derived and patient-derived FLT3-ITD xenografts, exhibiting stronger efficacy than clinically approved FLT3 inhibitors in treating FLT3-ITD AML. Moreover, foretinib showed potent activity against secondary mutations of FLT3-ITD that confer resistance to quizartinib and gilteritinib. These findings support the potential of foretinib for treating patients with AML with FLT3-ITD mutations, especially for those carrying secondary mutations after treatment failure with other FLT3 inhibitors. Significance: Foretinib exhibits superior efficacy to approved drugs in AML with FLT3-ITD mutations and retains activity in AML with secondary FLT3 mutations that mediate resistance to clinical FLT3 inhibitors.