More than half of patients with KRAS-wild type advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) fail anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. We studied EGFR-axis messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and RAS, RAF, PIK3CA mutations in order to identify additional biomarkers of cetuximab efficacy.

The aim was to compare two standard chemotherapy regimens combined with bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The aim of the trial was to compare two active adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in patients with early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients were assigned to oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-FU for 12 cycles (group A, FOLFOX6) or oxaliplatin and capecitabine for eight cycles (group B, CAPOX). Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Tumors were classified as mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) or deficient (dMMR) according to MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 protein expression. KRAS exon two and BRAF V600E mutational status were also assessed. Between 2005 and 2008, 441 patients were enrolled, with 408 patients being eligible. After a median follow-up of 74.7 months, 3-year DFS was 79.8 % (95 % CI 76.5–83.4) in the FOLFOX group and 79.5 % (95 % CI 75.9–83.1) in the CAPOX group (p = 0.78). Three-year OS was 87.2 % (95 % CI 84.1-91.1) in the FOLFOX and 86.9 % (95 % CI 83.4–89.9) in the CAPOX group (p = 0.84). Among 306 available tumors, 11.0 % were dMMR, 34.0 % KRAS mutant and 4.9 % BRAF mutant. Multivariate analysis showed that primary site in the left colon, earlier TNM stage and the presence of anemia at diagnosis were associated with better DFS and overall survival (OS), while grade one–two tumors were associated with better OS. Finally, a statistically significant interaction was detected between the primary site and MMR status (p = 0.010), while KRAS mutated tumors were associated with shorter DFS. However, the sample was too small for safe conclusions. No significant differences were observed in the efficacy of FOLFOX versus CAPOX as adjuvant treatment in high-risk stage II or stage III CRC patients, but definitive conclusions cannot be drawn because of the small sample size. ANZCTR 12610000509066 . Date of Registration: June 21, 2010.

An at least 3-month expected survival is a common inclusion criterion in cancer treatment trials, including advanced pancreatic cancer phase III studies. Published survival curves for advanced pancreatic cancer however seem to reflect a substantial survival shortfall. We wanted to assess the strength of this observation and search for an explanation by reviewing the literature. A Medline and EMBASE search was done for chemotherapy or chemotherapy based phase III studies in advanced pancreatic cancer published since 1997. Similar search was done at the American Society's of Clinical Oncology web site for abstracts presented since 2000. Three months mortality was based on the survival curves presented. Fourteen papers and five abstracts met our criteria and are included in our review. Six thousand two hundred and twelve patients participated in these trials and 1,447 (23.3%) died in the first 3-month period. Figures were worse in patients with metastases and poorer performance status. Assuming that most deaths during treatment happened during the first 3-months, cause of death was reported in only 40 cases (2.8%). Progressive cancer was reported as cause of death in 21 of these cases. Less frequent causes of death were reported to be infections, 'complications of cancer', thromboembolic events and renal failure. Overall treatment-related deaths represent a very small percentage of the deaths happening during the 3-month period, and are unlikely to be under-reported given the Good Clinical Practice oversight of these trials. Progressive cancer is likely to be an important cause of early mortality but given the very select nature of the trial-related population this cannot explain the phenomenon of 3-month early death burden of 23.3%. Our hypothesis, supported by multiple autopsy series, is that early death burden in advanced pancreatic cancer trial patients is likely to be due to under-reported vascular thromboembolic events. Thromboprophylaxis needs to be addressed in future trials.

Our aim was to determine the prevalence, prognostic and predictive role of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in cancer predisposing genes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Germline testing of 62 cancer susceptibility genes was performed on unselected patients diagnosed from 02/2003 to 01/2020 with PDAC, treated at Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)-affiliated Centers. The main endpoints were prevalence of P/LPVs and overall survival (OS). P/LPVs in PDAC-associated and homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes were identified in 22 (4.0%) and 42 (7.7%) of 549 patients, respectively. P/LPVs were identified in 16 genes, including ATM (11, 2.0%) and BRCA2 (6, 1.1%), while 19 patients (3.5%) were heterozygotes for MUTYH P/LPVs and 9 (1.6%) carried the low-risk allele, CHEK2 p.(Ile157Thr). Patients carrying P/LPVs had improved OS compared to non-carriers (22.6 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, there was a trend for improved OS in P/LPV carriers (p = 0.063). The interaction term between platinum exposure and mutational status of HRR genes was not significant (p-value = 0.35). A significant proportion of patients with PDAC carries clinically relevant germline P/LPVs, irrespectively of age, family history or disease stage. The predictive role of these P/LPVs has yet to be defined. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03982446.