Radiation therapy (RT) plays a crucial role in the treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs). This paper emphasizes the importance of effective communication and collaboration between radiation oncologists and dental specialists in the HNC care pathway. It also provides an overview of the role of RT in HNC treatment and illustrates the interdisciplinary collaboration between these teams to optimize patient care, expedite treatment, and prevent post-treatment oral complications. The methods utilized include a thorough analysis of existing research articles, case reports, and clinical guidelines, with terms such as ‘dental management’, ‘oral oncology’, ‘head and neck cancer’, and ‘radiotherapy’ included for this review. The findings underscore the significance of the early involvement of dental specialists in the treatment planning phase to assess and prepare patients for RT, including strategies such as prophylactic tooth extraction to mitigate potential oral complications. Furthermore, post-treatment oral health follow-up and management by dental specialists are crucial in minimizing the incidence and severity of RT-induced oral sequelae. In conclusion, these proactive measures help minimize dental and oral complications before, during, and after treatment.

Background and Aims: Active Surveillance (AS) is a favored strategy for the management of indolent prostate cancers (PCs). Overweight and obese men harbor an increased risk of cancer progression during AS. We aim to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a ketogenic diet (KD) weight-loss intervention in overweight men with PC. Materials and Methods: Men with PC and a BMI > 25 kg/m² undergoing AS were placed on an 8-week ad libitum KD program before a scheduled surveillance biopsy to assess the impact on clinical grade group (CGG). Blood ketone levels were tracked to ensure compliance. BMI, PSA, and inflammatory marker data (TNF-α, TNFR1, TNFR2, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, IL-6, IL1-RA, CRP, and SAA) were collected before and after the KD intervention. A Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to assess the normality of all continuous study variables. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were utilized to compare normally and non-normally distributed study outcomes, respectively. Results: Ten AS patients aged 62.1 (±5.4) years were enrolled with an average BMI of 31.7 kg/m² (±11.8). Post-KD intervention mean blood ketone levels were 0.32 (±0.12) mmol/L with a mean BMI reduction of 7.4% (p < 0.0003). There were no meaningful changes in PSA or inflammatory biomarkers (p > 0.05). Nine patients completed re-biopsy following a KD with four patients showing no evidence of cancer; one downgraded to a lower CGG; two had unchanged CGG scores; and two had higher CGG scores compared to baseline. Conclusions: Short-term KD interventions for BMI reduction are feasible in men undergoing AS for PC and may result in favorable pathological effects without inflammatory marker changes. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to explore whether KD-induced weight loss can improve clinical outcomes with AS in PC.

Low carbohydrate diets have a promising mechanistic rationale in the treatment of cancer with favorable preclinical data. The strongest data suggest synergistic effects of dietary interventions with traditional cancer therapies. Recent prospective clinical trials suggest that low carbohydrate diets are safely and feasibly added within a busy oncology clinic, with hopeful additive effects in treatment enhancement.

Background: Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) or computed tomography (CT)-guided moderately hypofractionated ablative radiation therapy (HART) can achieve favorable outcomes although have not previously been compared. Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective analysis of SMART (50 Gy/5 fractions) vs. HART (75 Gy/25 fractions or 67.5 Gy/15 fractions with concurrent capecitabine) for LAPC. Gray’s test and Cox proportional regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 211 patients (SMART, n = 91; HART, n = 120) were evaluated, and none had surgery. Median follow-up after SMART and HART was 27.0 and 40.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0002). SMART achieved higher gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage and greater hotspots. Two-year LF after SMART and HART was 6.5% and 32.9% (p < 0.001), while two-year OS was 31.0% vs. 35.3% (p = 0.056), respectively. LF was associated with SMART vs. HART (HR 5.389, 95% CI: 1.298–21.975; p = 0.021) and induction mFOLFIRINOX vs. non-mFOLFIRINOX (HR 2.067, 95% CI 1.038–4.052; p = 0.047), while OS was associated with CA19-9 decrease > 40% (HR 0.725, 95% CI 0.515–0.996; p = 0.046) and GTV V120% (HR 1.022, 95% CI 1.006–1.037; p = 0.015). Acute grade > 3 toxicity was similar (3.3% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.390), while late grade > 3 toxicity was less common after SMART (2.2% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.037). Conclusions: Ablative SMART and HART both achieve favorable oncologic outcomes for LAPC with minimal toxicity. We did not observe an OS difference, although technical advantages of SMART might improve target coverage and reduce LF.

Background/Objectives: Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in image-guided radiotherapy (RT) particularly with the introduction of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). However, the optimal clinical applications of MRgRT are still evolving. The intent of this analysis was to describe our institutional MRgRT utilization patterns and evolution therein, specifically as an early adopter within a center endowed with multiple other technology platforms. Materials/Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patterns of MRgRT utilization for patients treated with a 0.35-Tesla MR-Linac at our institution from April 2018 to April 2024. We analyzed changes in utilization across six annualized periods: Period 1 (April 2018–April 2019) through Period 6 (April 2023–April 2024). We defined ultra-hypofractionation (UHfx) as 5 or fewer fractions with a minimum fractional dose of 5 Gy. Electronic health records were reviewed, and data were extracted related to patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Results: A total of 823 treatment courses were delivered to 712 patients treated for 854 lesions. The most commonly treated sites were the pancreas (242 [29.4%]), thorax (172; 20.9%), abdominopelvic lymph nodes (107; 13.0%), liver (72; 8.7%), and adrenal glands (68; 8.3%). The median total prescribed dose of 50 Gy in five fractions (fxs) was typically delivered in consecutive days with automatic beam gating in inspiration breath hold. The median biologically effective dose (α/β = 10, BED10) was 94.4 Gy with nearly half (404, 49.1%) of all courses at a prescribed BED10 ≥ 100 Gy, which is widely regarded as a highly effective ablative dose. Courses in Period 6 vs. Period 1 more often had a prescribed BED10 ≥ 100 Gy (60.2% vs. 41.6%; p = 0.004). Of the 6036 total delivered fxs, nearly half (2643, 43.8%) required at least one fx of on-table adaptive radiotherapy (oART), most commonly for pancreatic tumors (1081, 17.9%). UHfx was used in over three quarters of all courses (630, 76.5%) with 472 (57.4%) of these requiring oART for at least one fraction. The relative utilization of oART increased significantly from Period 1 to Period 6 (37.6% to 85.0%; p < 0.001); a similar increase in the use of UHfx (66.3% to 89.5%; p < 0.001) was also observed. The median total in-room time for oART decreased from 81 min in Period 1 to 45 min in Period 6, while for non-oART, it remained stable around 40 min across all periods. Conclusions: Our institution implemented MRgRT with a priority for targeting mobile extracranial tumors in challenging anatomic locations that are frequently treated with dose escalation, require enhanced soft-tissue visualization, and could benefit from an ablative radiotherapy approach. Over the period under evaluation, the use of high-dose ablative doses (BED10 ≥ 100 Gy), oART and UHfx (including single-fraction ablation) increased significantly, underscoring both a swift learning curve and ability to optimize processes to maximize throughput and efficiency.

Background/Objectives: Non-ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly employed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using computed tomography-guided radiotherapy (CTgRT) without online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). The safe delivery of ablative SBRT has been demonstrated using stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART). We performed an in silico comparison of non-adapted CTgRT versus SMART to better understand the potential benefit of oART for ablative pancreatic SBRT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated original and daily adapted SMART plans that were previously delivered for 20 consecutive LAPC cases (120 total plans across all patients) treated on a 0.35 T MR-linac prescribed to 50 Gy (gross disease) and 33 Gy (elective sites) simultaneously in five fractions. Six comparative CTgRT plans for each patient (one original, five daily treatment) were retrospectively generated with the same prescribed dose and planning parameters as the SMART plans assuming no oART availability. The impact of daily anatomic changes on CTgRT and SMART plans without oART was evaluated across each treatment day MRI scan acquired for SMART. Results: Ninety percent of cases involved the pancreatic head. No statistically significant differences were seen between CTgRT and SMART with respect to target coverage. Nearly all (96%) fractions planned on either CT or MRI platforms exceeded at least one GI organ at risk (OAR) constraint without oART. Significant differences favoring SMART over non-adaptive CTgRT were observed for the duodenum V35 Gy ≤ 0.5 cc (34.2 vs. 41.9 Gy, p = 0.0035) and duodenum V40 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (37 vs. 52.5 Gy, p = 0.0006) constraints. Stomach V40 Gy trended towards significance favoring SMART (37 vs. 40.3 Gy, p = 0.057) while no significant differences were seen. Conclusions: This is the first study that quantifies the frequency and extent of GI OAR constraint violations that would occur during ablative five-fraction SBRT using SMART vs. CTgRT. GI OAR constraint violations are expected for most fractions without oART whereas all constraints can be achieved with oART. As such, these data suggest that oART should be required for ablative five-fraction pancreatic SBRT.