Guoqiang Zhang

Dr. Guoqiang Zhang

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Crop Sciences, Beijing, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in Field Crops Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Guoqiang ZhangGuoqiang Zhang
Guoqiang Zhang
CLChaowei Liu
Chaowei Liu
CXChunhua Xiao
Chunhua Xiao
RXRuizhi Xie
Ruizhi Xie
BMBo Ming
Bo Ming
SLShaokun Li
Shaokun Li

1 May 2015 in Agronomy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJ. Li
J. Li
RXR. Z. Xie
R. Z. Xie
KWK. R. Wang
K. R. Wang
BMBo Ming
Bo Ming
YGY. Q. Guo
Y. Q. Guo
SLS. K. Li
S. K. Li

10 February 2022 in Food and Energy Security
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGuangzhou Liu
Guangzhou Liu
YYYunshan Yang
Yunshan Yang
WLWanmao Liu
Wanmao Liu
XGXiaoxia Guo
Xiaoxia Guo
RXRuizhi Xie
Ruizhi Xie
Shaokun LiShaokun Li
Shaokun Li
Improved canopy structure was instrumental in setting maize yield records, and yet it has rarely been examined in China. At Qitai Farm in Xinjiang, we conducted a 4‐year field experiment using China's six highest‐yielding maize hybrids sorted into three yield level groups that were grown at similar growth durations and at optimum densities. The average yield of high‐yield level (HL, 22.3 Mg ha−1) was 7.2% and 24.6% higher than that of medium‐yield level (ML) and low‐yield level (LL), respectively. For each yield level, we measured morphological traits that influence canopy structure and yield. They included plant height, ear height, ear ratio, internode length, leaf numbers, leaf angle, LOV, leaf area, and spatial density of leaf area. Among the preceding morphological traits of the three yield levels, HL’s best optimized the canopy structure, as shown by improved light distribution (19.0% light transmission at the ear) and increased light interception per unit leaf area per day (LIPA, 51.7 MJ m−2 day−1) in the canopy. In comparison, light transmission was 12.2% and 15.9% at the ear and the total LIPAs were 37.2 and 29.0 MJ m−2 day−1 at silking for ML and LL, respectively. HL had significantly longer leaf area duration and a higher photosynthetic rate, especially at the grain filling stage, and its total accumulated biomass at maturity was significantly better (by 13.9%) than LL’s. HL’s harvest index (0.54) was significantly higher than that of ML (0.52) and LL (0.48). HL’s radiation and heat use efficiencies were 2.61% and 1.37 g °C−1 day−1 m−2, both significantly greater than those of ML and LL. Therefore, optimum maize plant types can significantly improve canopy structure and increase resource use efficiency and grain yield.

1 August 2021 in Agricultural Water Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FWFeng Wang
Feng Wang
RXRuizhi Xie
Ruizhi Xie
BMBo Ming
Bo Ming
KWKeru Wang
Keru Wang
PHPeng Hou
Peng Hou
SLShaokun Li
Shaokun Li

1 June 2019 in The Crop Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Guoqiang ZhangGuoqiang Zhang
Guoqiang Zhang
DSDongping Shen
Dongping Shen
BMBo Ming
Bo Ming
RXRuizhi Xie
Ruizhi Xie
Xiuliang JinXiuliang Jin
Xiuliang Jin
SLShaokun Li
Shaokun Li

13 July 2021 in Food and Energy Security
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rongfa LiRongfa Li
Rongfa Li
Guoqiang ZhangGuoqiang Zhang
Guoqiang Zhang
GLGuangzhou Liu
Guangzhou Liu
KWKeru Wang
Keru Wang
RXRuizhi Xie
Ruizhi Xie
Shaokun LiShaokun Li
Shaokun Li
Understanding the impact of changes in the crop canopy on yield is important in order to meet future food demands. We designed a field experiment to investigate the relationships between crop‐related factors and yield gaps in maize to enhance crop yields from 2010 to 2018 in Qitai, China. Maize grain yields (n = 247) were divided into four yield ranges: 21 Mg ha−1 (n = 24). The characteristics of the maize canopy structure as well as the light interception, photosynthetic potential, and radiation utilization efficiency in these four yield ranges were analyzed. The canopy structure of treated fields with yields >21 Mg ha−1 had a higher leaf area index (7.2), lower ear ratio (0.39), longer internodes above the ear (20.1 cm), larger leaf orientation value (LOV) above the ear (48.6), smaller leaf angle above the ear (18°), and smaller LOV below the ear (36.0) when compared to the other treatments. These findings suggested that the yield gap is dependent on canopy structure, and the evolutionary trend also accounted for significant increases in post‐LAD (p < 0.01), changes in crop growth rate (CGR; p < 0.01), net assimilation rate (NAR; p < 0.05), and radiation utilization efficiency. The radiation utilization efficiencies in the 15–18, 18–21, and >21 Mg ha−1 treatments (1.23, 1.28, and 1.38 g MJ−1, respectively) were higher than for the <15 Mg ha−1 treatment (1.10 g MJ−1). Furthermore, there are opportunities to narrow the yield gaps by optimizing the canopy structure to make full use of the solar radiation resources. Our results will help breeders choose an ideal canopy structure to improve yield. In addition, our results may serve as a general guide for other maize growing regions.